Legislative Recommendations Sample Clauses

Legislative Recommendations. Phase-out the use of lead ammunition across all habitats (wetland and terrestrial) with non-toxic alternatives within the next three years with Parties reporting to CMS Conference of the Parties (COP12) in 2017, working with stakeholders on implementation Create legislative process to prohibit the use of lead ammunition Ministry of Environment Ministry of Agriculture Medium End 2017 Remediate lead ammunition-contaminated environments Create legislative processes to facilitate remediation of lead ammunition- contaminated environments Ministry of Agriculture Ministry of Environment Medium End 2017 (5. 2) Lead fishing weights (5. 2.1) Non-legislative recommendations PRIORITIZED ACTIVITIES MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY High, Medium or Low TIMELINE DEADLINE ADDITONAL NOTES Raise awareness of the issue of lead poisoning from fishing weights and solutions to the problem Further inquiries/survey to investigate the use of lead fishing weights and the magnitude of its usage in the country. This will determine the next activities to be targeted under this subject Advice can be sought from external advisors Ministry of Fisheries and Ministry of Environment Low Start mid- 2017 Remove obsolete abandoned fishing nets from wetlands Ministry of Fisheries and Ministry of Environment Low Start mid- 2017 Raise awareness among fishermen about the risks of use of lead fishing weights in their fishing nets Ministry of Fisheries and Ministry of Environment Low Start mid- 2017 Campaigns targeting fishermen (not applicable for now) Ministry of Fisheries and Ministry of Environment Low Start mid- 2017 Encourage leadership from angling organizations and manufacturers for non-toxic fishing weights Raise awareness among manufacturers Ministry of Agriculture Ministry of Environment Medium End 2018 Promote anglers’ codes of practice Raise awareness among fisherman and local communities Ministry of Agriculture Ministry of Environment Medium End 2018 PRIORITIZED ACTIVITIES MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY High, Medium or Low TIMELINE DEADLINE ADDITONAL NOTES
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Legislative Recommendations. Prohibit the use of veterinary diclofenac for the treatment of livestock and substitute with readily available safe alternatives, such as meloxicam Veterinary Diclofenac will be included in the chemicals legislation in order to avoid any start of use 2018, but process ongoing and should be completed Reduce likelihood of illegal use of human pharmaceuticals None; not relevant at the moment
Sample 1
Legislative Recommendations. The MPO shall compile legislative recommendations for the HOST PROVIDER to submit to the local legislative delegation, Florida legislative committees, and other regional bodies relating to transportation planning and transportation-related aspects of comprehensive planning. The MPO shall consult and coordinate with the HOST PROVIDER and other local governments on assessing the impacts or opportunities presented by State and Federal legislation and policy initiatives.
Sample 1
Legislative Recommendations. Prohibit the use of veterinary diclofenac for the treatment of livestock and substitute with readily available safe alternatives, such as meloxicam;  Introduce mandatory safety-testing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); involve VICH/OECD2 to evaluate and provide guidance on wider risks;  Reduce likelihood of illegal use of human pharmaceuticals.  Raise awareness of lead poisoning; promote leadership from ammunition users;
Sample 1
Legislative Recommendations. Prohibit the use of veterinary diclofenac for the treatment of livestock and substitute with readily available safe alternatives, such as meloxicam Update legislation Ministry of Agriculture Ministry of Environment Low End 2018 Develop methods to reduce the likelihood of illegal use of human pharmaceuticals (could also be Non- legislative) Veterinary diclofenac use is not prohibited in Angola, but it is not used for veterinary purposes because the cost implications are considered as being too high Ministry of Agriculture Low End 2018 Include “not for veterinary use” on labels of human diclofenac Ministry of Agriculture Low End 2018 Introduce mandatory reporting for pharmacies to third-party regulatory bodies and require pharmacies to record sale and purchaser details Ministry of Agriculture Ministry of Environment Low End 2018 .1) Lead ammunition (including shot, pellets and bullets) (5.
Sample 1
Legislative Recommendations. Phase-out the use of lead fishing weights in areas where migratory birds have been shown to be particularly at risk i.
Sample 1
Legislative Recommendations. Introduce ban on lead fishing weights Implementation in the ongoing revision of the fisheries regulations Wildlife Department High Immediate PRIORITIZED ACTIVITIES MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY High, Medium or Low TIMELINE DEADLINE ADDITONAL NOTES
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Legislative Recommendations. Ensure legislative/regulatory effectiveness: create enforcement legislation with effective deterrent mechanisms and infringement penalties Enhance enforcement and deterrence mechanisms relating to the use of poison-baits Enhance enforcement and deterrence mechanisms relating to the use of poison-baits Request information from Ministry of Agriculture Suspend/withdraw hunting licenses for persons and areas where illegal poison-bait activity occurs Request information from Ministry of Agriculture Establish sentencing guidelines to ensure consistent and effective outcomes Request information from Ministry of Agriculture Increase capacity and capability for enforcement with focused resourcing Request information from Ministry of Agriculture Introduce vicarious liability Request information from Ministry of Agriculture PRIORITIZED ACTIVITIES MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY High, Medium or Low TIMELINE DEADLINE ADDITONAL NOTES Restrict access to highly toxic substances through stronger enforcement of supply chain: identify the ways poisons are acquired and why the established control mechanisms do not prevent their illegal use Gather information by closer investigations. Request information from Ministry of Agriculture Remove grace periods for banned products Request information from Ministry of Agriculture Establish consistent product removal policies between countries Request information from Ministry of Agriculture Restrict access to certified professionals only Request information from Ministry of Agriculture
Sample 1
Legislative Recommendations 
Sample 1

Related to Legislative Recommendations

  • No Government Recommendation or Approval The Subscriber understands that no federal or state agency has passed upon or made any recommendation or endorsement of the offering of the Shares.

  • Legislative Action IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES THAT ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT REQUIRING LEGISLATIVE ACTION TO PERMIT ITS IMPLEMENTATION BY AMENDMENT OF LAW OR BY PROVIDING THE ADDITIONAL FUNDS THEREFORE, SHALL NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE UNTIL THE APPROPRIATE LEGISLATIVE BODY HAS GIVEN APPROVAL.

  • Conclusions and Recommendations Based on our country-by-country analysis, 197 of the AEWA populations are already well-monitored both for population size and trend. Our prioritisation method allowed focusing on the AEWA conservation and management priorities (Priorities 1-2) and to consider cost effectiveness and feasibility (Priorities 3-6). Theoretically, the two- third target of the AEWA Strategic Plan can be just attained by focusing on the development of monitoring activities for Priority 1-5 populations (i.e. leaving out the 168 more widespread Priority 6 populations that would require more species-specific monitoring methods. Most of the Priority 1-5 populations would require improvement of the IWC though regional schemes focusing on the West Asian / East African flyway with possibly three subregional components in the Central Asia, Arabia and Eastern and Southern Africa. In the latter region, improvements in Tanzania and Mozambique are particularly important. In the Black Sea - Mediterranean - Sahelian flyway the focus should be primarily on the Sahel countries and especially on increasing the consistency of annual counts. The quality of monitoring is already better in the Black Sea and Mediterranean regions. In the East Atlantic, the ongoing capacity-building activities should continue and the consistency and representativity of site coverage should be further strengthened in most countries. Angola would require a major capacity improvement but primarily for the intra-African migrants on inland wetlands. It is also clear that the targets of the AEWA Strategic Plan cannot be achieved without complementing the IWC with periodic aerial surveys both in Western Africa as well as in Eastern and Southern Africa, by setting up a periodic offshore waterbird monitoring scheme in the Caspian Sea and by focusing in each country on a relatively small number of breeding bird species strategically selected in this report.

  • Company Board Recommendation (a) Subject to the terms of Section 6.3(b) and Section 6.3(c), the Company Board shall recommend that the holders of Company Shares accept the Offer, tender their Company Shares to Acquisition Sub pursuant to the Offer and, if required by the applicable provisions of Delaware Law, adopt this Agreement (the “Company Board Recommendation”). (b) Neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall (i) fail to make the Company Board Recommendation to the holders of the Company Shares, (ii) withhold, withdraw, amend or modify in a manner adverse to Parent, or publicly propose to withhold, withdraw, amend or modify in a manner adverse to Parent, the Company Board Recommendation, (iii) adopt, approve, recommend, endorse or otherwise declare advisable the adoption of any Acquisition Proposal (it being understood that, only with respect to a tender offer or exchange offer, taking a neutral position or no position (other than in a communication made in compliance with Rule 14d-9(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) with respect to any Acquisition Proposal shall be considered a breach of this clause (iii)), or (iv) resolve, agree or publicly propose to take any such actions (each such foregoing action or failure to act in clauses (i) through (iv) being referred to herein as an “Company Board Recommendation Change”). Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, if, at any time prior to the Appointment Time, the Company Board receives a Superior Proposal or there occurs an Intervening Event, the Company Board may effect a Company Board Recommendation Change provided that (i) the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that the failure to effect a Company Board Recommendation Change would reasonably be expected to be a breach of its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law, and in the case of a Superior Proposal, the Company Board approves or recommends such Superior Proposal; (ii) the Company has notified Parent in writing that it intends to effect a Company Board Recommendation Change, describing in reasonable detail the reasons, including the material terms and conditions of any such Superior Proposal and a copy of the final form of any related agreements or a description in reasonable detail of such Intervening Event, as the case may be, for such Company Board Recommendation Change (a “Recommendation Change Notice”) (it being understood that the Recommendation Change Notice shall not constitute a Company Board Recommendation Change for purposes of this Agreement); (iii) if requested by Parent, the Company shall have made its Representatives available to discuss and negotiate in good faith with Parent’s Representatives any proposed modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement during the three (3) Business Day period following delivery by the Company to Parent of such Recommendation Change Notice; and (iv) if Parent shall have delivered to the Company a written proposal capable of being accepted by the Company to alter the terms or conditions of this Agreement during such three (3) Business Day period, the Company Board shall have determined in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel), after considering the terms of such proposal by Parent, that a Company Board Recommendation Change is still necessary in light of such Superior Proposal or Intervening Event in order to comply with its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law. Any material amendment or modification to any Superior Proposal will be deemed to be a new Superior Proposal for purposes of this Section 6.3. The Company shall keep confidential any proposals made by Parent to revise the terms of this Agreement, other than in the event of any amendment to this Agreement and to the extent required to be disclosed in any Company SEC Reports. (c) Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit the Company Board from (i) taking and disclosing to the Company Stockholders a position contemplated by Rule 14e-2(a) under the Exchange Act or complying with the provisions of Rule 14d-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and (ii) making any disclosure to the Company Stockholders that the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel) that the failure to make such disclosure would reasonably be expected to be a breach of its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law; provided, however, that in no event shall this Section 6.3(c) affect the obligations of the Company set forth in Sections 6.2 and 6.3; and provided, further, that any such disclosure will be deemed to be a Company Board Recommendation Change unless the Board of Directors publicly reaffirms the Company Board Recommendation within five Business Days of such disclosure.

  • Board Recommendation The Acquiror Company Board, by unanimous written consent, has determined that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are advisable and in the best interests of the Acquiror Company’s stockholders and has duly authorized this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Halifax Regional Municipality Charter (HRM Charter), Part VIII, Planning & Development.

  • Decision of the Board The decision of the majority shall be the decision of the Board. Where there is no majority decision, the decision of the Chairperson shall be the decision of the Board. The decision of the Board of Arbitration shall be final, binding and enforceable on all parties, and may not be changed. The Board of Arbitration shall not have the power to change this Agreement or to alter, modify or amend any of its provisions. However, the Board shall have the power to dispose of a grievance by any arrangement which it deems just and equitable.

  • References to Statutes, Public Acts, Regulations, Codes and Executive Orders All references in this Contract to any statute, public act, regulation, code or executive order shall mean such statute, public act, regulation, code or executive order, respectively, as it has been amended, replaced or superseded at any time. Notwithstanding any language in this Contract that relates to such statute, public act, regulation, code or executive order, and notwithstanding a lack of a formal amendment to this Contract, this Contract shall always be read and interpreted as if it contained the most current and applicable wording and requirements of such statute, public act, regulation, code or executive order as if their most current language had been used in and requirements incorporated into this Contract at the time of its execution.

  • Composition of the Committee The Committee will comprise: - one (1) retiree appointed by OPSEU CAAT Academic - one (1) retiree appointed by OPSEU CAAT Support - one (1) retiree appointed by the Ontario Colleges Administrative Staff Association (OCASA) - three (3) management representatives appointed by the Council - one (1) resource person appointed by OPSEU - one (1) resource person appointed by OCASA - one (1) resource person appointed by the Council Additionally, when necessary, representatives of insurance carriers shall attend meetings to provide information but shall not act as resource persons for any of the parties.

  • Change of Recommendation Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company’s Board of Directors may, if it concludes in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors) that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, make an Adverse Recommendation Change; provided that prior to any such Adverse Recommendation Change, (A) the Company shall have given Parent and Merger Sub prompt written notice advising them of (x) the decision of the Company’s Board of Directors to take such action and the reasons therefor and (y) in the event the decision relates to an Alternative Transaction Proposal, a summary of the material terms and conditions of the Alternative Transaction Proposal and other information requested to be provided with respect thereto pursuant to this Section 5.4, including the information required to be provided pursuant to Section 5.4(b) and (c), (B) the Company shall have given Parent and Merger Sub three (3) Business Days (the “Notice Period”) after delivery of each such notice to propose revisions to the terms of this Agreement (or make another proposal) and, during the Notice Period, the Company shall, and shall direct its financial advisors and outside legal advisors to, negotiate with Parent in good faith (to the extent Parent desires to negotiate) to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that, if applicable, such Alternative Transaction Proposal ceases to constitute (in the judgment of the Company’s Board of Directors, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors), a Superior Proposal or, if the Adverse Recommendation Change does not involve an Alternative Transaction Proposal, to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that such Adverse Recommendation Change is otherwise not necessary, and (C) the Company’s Board of Directors shall have determined in good faith, after considering the results of such negotiations and giving effect to the proposals made by Parent and Merger Sub, if any, that such Alternative Transaction Proposal, if applicable, continues to constitute a Superior Proposal or that such Adverse Recommendation Change is otherwise still required; provided further that, (1) if during the Notice Period described in clause (B) of this paragraph any revisions are made to the Superior Proposal, if applicable, and the Company’s Board of Directors in its good faith judgment determines (after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors) that such revisions are material (it being understood that any change in the purchase price or form of consideration in such Superior Proposal shall be deemed a material revision), the Company shall deliver a new written notice to Parent and shall comply with the requirements of this Section 5.4(d) with respect to such new written notice except that the new Notice Period shall be two (2) Business Days instead of three (3) Business Days and (2) in the event the Company’s Board of Directors does not make the determination referred to in clause (C) of this paragraph but thereafter determines to make an Adverse Recommendation Change pursuant to this Section 5.4(d), the procedures referred to in clauses (A), (B) and (C) above shall apply anew and shall also apply to any subsequent withdrawal, amendment or change.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!