Methods & mapping Sample Clauses

Methods & mapping. For achieving a better understanding of the reality of the innovation ecosystem in the region, the research team conducted a case study that was structured around a policy documentation analysis and several interviews with key informants. The objective of this case study is to understand the socio-cultural particularities of the regional innovation ecosystem as well as which kind of “de facto RRI” (Xxxxxxx et al., 2016) features are embedded in their actors. Integrating RRI into a regional innovation ecosystem should pay particular attention to the context and the special circumstances of where innovation and research practices are embedded (Uyarra et al., 2019). Specially, because geography is mostly missing in RRI (Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx, & Xxxxxx, 2019). Therefore, delivering “a mapping” of the region for identifying relevant actors, initiatives, activities dynamics, priorities and particularities is the first step in this path. This mapping also aims to provide an understanding of the configuration of the regional innovation ecosystem, how it works and what are their dynamics. In addition, there is a strong need on RRI for acquiring knowledge about the context where it will be implemented (Xxxxxxx et al., 2020). For achieving this objective, a policy document analysis comprising several documents of interest such as policy documents at regional level, national level as well as other documents delivered by experts were screened. Several searches in Google Scholar and Scopus databases were also delivered introducing keywords such as innovation, regional economy, Cantabria, and smart specialization. In addition to this, another relevant documentation facilitated by policy representatives and regional experts was also incorporated and analysed. For complementing this desk research, the research team also conducted several semi-structured interviews with key informants. Following the work presented in Deliverable 2.1, which includes a “Mapping Tool” and two different kind of questionnaires (one for the policy actors and another one for the innovation ecosystem actors), we developed our fieldwork during the months of January, February and March of 2021. In this period of time we were able to interview 16 participants that represents 19 organizations in 12 interviews. Some of the interviews were collective, that is, they involved several interviewees as well as others were developed on an individual basis. This was due to the adequacy of having several representa...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Methods & mapping

  • Mapping Mapping by joint DHB/PSA teams at each DHB to match the work of the clerical and administration workforce at the DHB to national role profiles5.

  • Methods i. Brief description of the method used.

  • System Logging The system must maintain an automated audit trail which can 20 identify the user or system process which initiates a request for PHI COUNTY discloses to 21 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY, 22 or which alters such PHI. The audit trail must be date and time stamped, must log both successful and 23 failed accesses, must be read only, and must be restricted to authorized users. If such PHI is stored in a 24 database, database logging functionality must be enabled. Audit trail data must be archived for at least 3 25 years after occurrence.

  • Interfaces Bellcore’s GR-446-CORE defines the interface between the administration system and LIDB including specific message formats. (Bellcore’s TR-NWP-000029, Section 10)

  • Methods of Measurement The methods used to identify the educational strengths and needs of students are set forth in the approved Application.

  • Architecture The Private Improvements shall have architectural features, detailing, and design elements in accordance with the Project Schematic Drawings. All accessory screening walls or fences, if necessary, shall use similar primary material, color, and detailing as on the Private Improvements.

  • Protocols Each party hereby agrees that the inclusion of additional protocols may be required to make this Agreement specific. All such protocols shall be negotiated, determined and agreed upon by both parties hereto.

  • Methods of Interconnection The Parties will negotiate the facilities arrangement used to interconnect their respective networks. CLEC shall establish at least one (1) physical Point of Interconnection in CenturyLink territory in each LATA CLEC has local End User Customers. CLEC represents and warrants that it is serving End User Customers physically located within each local calling area for which it wishes to exchange traffic within CenturyLink territory. The Parties shall establish, through negotiations, at least one (1) of the following Interconnection arrangements, at any Technically Feasible point: (1) a DS1 or DS3 CenturyLink-provided facility; (2) Collocation; (3) negotiated Mid-Span Meet POI facilities; or (4) other Technically Feasible methods of Interconnection via the Bona Fide Request (BFR) process unless a particular arrangement has been previously provided to a third party, or is offered by CenturyLink as a product.

  • Model List your model number of the product you are bidding.

  • Inputs 921 The following resources constitute a suitable, but neither exhaustive nor normative suite of the process inputs:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!