Monthly Evaluation Sample Clauses

Monthly Evaluation. 10 9.3.1 CONTRACTOR shall submit ongoing written evaluations, in 11 the form of an updated Treatment Plan, on each MOTHER to MOTHER’s Assigned 12 Social Worker on a monthly basis, to be submitted within seven (7) calendar 13 days following the monthly reporting period. These evaluations shall include, 14 but not be limited to: 15 9.3.2 Progress toward accomplishing goals and outcomes addressed 16 in Paragraph 10 of Exhibit A of this Agreement. 17 9.3.3 Identification of MOTHER’s unmet needs, assessment of 18 unmet needs, and efforts made to meet these needs. 19 9.3.4 Current status of MOTHER’s and children’s physical and 20 psychological health, including a report of medical care received and 21 medication given. 22 9.3.5 Modification of the Treatment Plan; and, as necessary, the 23 tasks to be performed by MOTHER, and changes in the anticipated length of 24 stay. 25 9.3.6 The number and dates of contacts with MOTHER’s Assigned 26 Social Worker, psychiatrist(s), psychologist(s), Assigned Social Worker,
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Monthly Evaluation. 2.1 During the effectivity of this contract, the UNIVERSITY, through the OVCA, shall evaluate each month the security services actually rendered by the AGENCY. The OVCA shall make such evaluation on the basis of, which shall include, but not limited to the following matters: a. Actual deployment by the AGENCY of security personnel and performance of their functions and responsibilities; b. Problems encountered and solutions recommended or undertaken; c. AGENCY’s faithful compliance with the provisions of this Contract; and d. Monthly report from the UNIVERSITY’s unit heads on the performance of the security personnel. 2.2 The AGENCY shall be solely and exclusively responsible on the ways and means for the delivery or performance of the security services including the discipline and control of all its security personnel deployed in the UNIVERSITY under this Contract. The AGENCY hereby acknowledges that any failure of their security personnel to exercise its due diligence in the performance and conduct of such security personnel as well as by way of liquidated damages corresponding to violation or prescribed conduct as defined in Annex “E” hereof, the UNIVERSITY may pre-terminate their services. For this purpose, any individual or committee duly authorized by the UNIVERSITY, shall investigate and submit a report in writing to the UNIVERSITY, through the OVCA, any commission or conduct by any security personnel of the AGENCY of any act listed as herein stated in Annex “E”. Copies of such report shall be provided to the OLC, the AGENCY, and the erring security guard(s). The Vice Chancellor for Administration shall evaluate within five days from receipt of the report and shall notify in writing the AGENCY the recommended action and amount of liquidated damages, which shall be paid by the AGENCY within ten days from receipt of the notice/decision. The determination of the Vice Chancellor for Administration shall be final and executory; provided, however, that, if the AGENCY fails to pay the amount of liquidated damages within the period prescribed, the UNIVERSITY has the option to deduct the amount of liquidated damages from any amounts due or to become due to the AGENCY. The payment of liquidated damages as provided for in this Section shall not prevent the UNIVERSITY from availing of other remedies or legal action available against the erring security personnel and/or the AGENCY, under the law or this Contract. 2.3 The AGENCY shall assign one security personne...
Monthly Evaluation. On a monthly basis, Consultant shall provide an update to the Company detailing what Services were provided for the previous month. The Company’s management shall evaluate the work done each month and provide guidance on what Services are required for the following month.
Monthly Evaluation. 13 CONTRACTOR shall submit monthly written evaluations on each YOUNfi 14 ADULT to the TPSP Liaison, ASW, ADMINISTRATOR, DPO, or Parole Agent on a 15 monthly basis, to be submitted within seven (7) calendar days following the 16 monthly reporting period. The reports will be submitted in the format 17 approved by ADMINISTRATOR. Evaluations shall include, but not be limited to: 18 13.3.1 Progress of the seven (7) focus areas addressed in 19 Subparagraph 14 of Exhibit A of this Agreement. 20 13.3.2 Progress toward accomplishing long-range goal(s), short- 21 term objectives, and tasks. 22 13.3.3 Identification of YOUNfi ADULT's unmet needs, assessment 23 of unmet needs and efforts made to meet these needs. 24 13.3.4 Reassessment of YOUNfi ADULT's adjustment to the THP+ 25 program. 26 13.3.5 Current status of YOUNfi ADULT's physical and 27 psychological health. A report of medical care received and medication given 28 (prescribed and/or medication compliance as known to the staff). (CVC1316 CMS2015) Page 21 of 43 (March 14, 2016) 1 13.3.6 Modification of YOUNfi ADULT's TILP, as necessary.
Monthly Evaluation. At the end of each month, you should add up the time units in the “+” or “-” daily balance columns. The difference between “+” and “-” gives the time balance for the past month. The current overall balance is calculated from the overall balance of the previous month, the balance for the current month minus any paid overtime. Alternatively, a running overall balance can also be calculated on a daily basis.
Monthly Evaluation. 15 CONTRACTOR shall submit monthly written evaluations on each YOUNfi 16 ADULT to the TPSP Liaison, ASW, ADMINISTRATOR, DPO, or Parole Agent on a 17 monthly basis, to be submitted within seven (7) calendar days following the 18 monthly reporting period. The reports will be submitted in the format 19 approved by ADMINISTRATOR. Evaluations shall include, but not be limited to: 20 13.3.1 Progress of the seven (7) focus areas addressed in 21 Subparagraph 14 of Exhibit A of this Agreement. 22 13.3.2 Progress toward accomplishing long-range goal(s), short- 23 term objectives, and tasks. 24 13.3.3 Identification of YOUNfi ADULT’s unmet needs, assessment 25 of unmet needs and efforts made to meet these needs. 26 13.3.4 Reassessment of YOUNfi ADULT’s adjustment to the THP+ 27 program. 1 13.3.5 Current status of YOUNfi ADULT’s physical and 2 psychological health. A report of medical care received and medication given. 3 13.3.6 Modification of YOUNfi ADULTS’s TILP, as necessary. 4 13.3.7 A record of any serious behavioral problems and how these 5 problems were/are being treated, as well as YOUNfi ADULT’s response(s). 6 13.3.8 A record of conferences and visits, the contacts with 7 relatives and friends, and any significant others as it relates to permanency 8 connections. 9 13.3.9 CONTRACTOR shall also make available to YOUNfi ADULT’s 10 TPSP Liaison or ASW, copies of any pertinent information such as school 11 reports, medical reports and psychological/psychiatric reports as completed.

Related to Monthly Evaluation

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Job Evaluation The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • FINANCIAL EVALUATION (a) The financial bid shall be opened of only those bidders who have been found to be technically eligible. The financial bids shall be opened in presence of representatives of technically eligible bidders, who may like to be present. The institute shall inform the date, place and time for opening of financial bid. (b) Arithmetical errors shall be rectified on the following basis. If there is a discrepancy between the unit price and total price that is, the unit price shall prevail and the total price shall be corrected by the Institute. If there is a discrepancy between words and figures, the lesser amount shall be considered as valid. If the Supplier does not accept the correction of the errors, his bid shall be rejected. (c) The AIIMS Jodhpur does not bind himself to accept the lowest bid or any bid and reserves the right of accepting the whole or any part of the bid or portion of the job offered; and the bidder shall provide the same at the rates quoted. The AIIMS Jodhpur reserves the right to reject any or all offers received in response to tender or cancel or withdraw the tender notice without assigning any reason, whatsoever.

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Performance Evaluations The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!