Panel Discussion Sample Clauses

Panel Discussion. Moderators and speakers
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Panel Discussion. The following speakers partook in a panel discussion regarding the research results of the project: Xxxx XXXXXX: Head of sector "Youth Communities Management and Support", Directorate General for Education and Culture, European Commission Xxxx XXXXX highlighted that there are different regions of the EU and that different populations have behaved differently in the times of crisis. After the economic crisis, there was a big investment in youth mobility – it was used by several entities to combat societal issues. In terms of higher education, numbers show that it did not suffer; there are more students, but not necessarily diverse students. Xxxx XXXXXX stressed that youth mobility does have a positive impact for young people in the labour market; language skills improve, young people become more independent and better team players (in terms of EVS), and they become aware of cultural differences. Erasmus+ has not been cut financially, and this is not foreseen. Xxxxxxxx XXXXXXXXXX stated that in Germany, very few young people have mobility experiences. Mobility programmes must be adapted to every country’s complex reality (some countries face brain drain, others are much more balanced for example). Xxxxxx XXXXXXXX emphasised that the focus should not just be on how mobility has changed, but how the lives of young people have changed. Complexity is the key word. Becoming an adult is complex, young people have less and less jobs, and face increasing anxiety and performance pressure. Mobility can also reinforce inequality. Xx. Xxxxxxxx stated that mobility programmes should focus on quality not quantity – numbers do not show the impact of mobility. He summed up mobility in 3 key words: complexity, inequality, quality. - Personalised support to young people is crucial, and they must be educated in formal and non-formal ways. - Before information comes basic awareness that this is a life choice. In higher education it is a given, but for other mobility types (such as VET), young people are not even aware that this is a possibility for them. Therefore, 15-17 year olds should be offered a diverse range of exchanges, so that they are aware of the possibility of going abroad later on. - European-level partnerships are crucial to reach out to those that are excluded, as not all young people are part of the ‘European bubble.’ There should be funding from many sectors. - The European Solidarity Corps has proposed 25% more than the funding for EVS (they are currently wait...
Sample 1Sample 2
Panel Discussion. Organisation (NGO) and holds observers’ status with several United Nations agencies involved with shipping industry matters, notably the International Maritime Organization and working closely together with maritime administrators in e.g. the European Community and the United States. In recognition of its position within the international shipping community, the US Coast Guard formed a partnership agreement with BIMCO to jointly address issues of regulatory compliance and maritime governance in an effort to find practical and workable solutions for shipowners plying US trade. BIMCO is committed to promote fair and equitable international shipping policy and regulatory matters and seeks to continue to be the selected and trusted sparring partner and source of practical information by policymakers and other stakeholders. About International Association of Independent Tanker Owners (INTERTANKO) INTERTANKO has been the voice of independent tanker owners since 1970, ensuring that the oil that keeps the world turning is shipped safely, and Strategic Studies (IDSS), which was established ten years earlier on 30 July 1996. Like its predecessor, RSIS was established as an autonomous entity within the Nanyang Technological University (NTU). The School exists to develop a community of scholars and policy analysts at the forefront of Asia- Pacific security studies and international affairs. Its three core functions are research, graduate teaching and networking activities in the Asia-Pacific region. It produces cutting edge security related research in Asia-Pacific Security, Conflict and Non-Traditional Security, International Political Economy, and Country and Area Studies. The School‘s activities are aimed at assisting policymakers to develop comprehensive approaches to strategic thinking on issues related to security and stability in the Asia-Pacific and their implications for Singapore. 07 2nd PANEL DISCUSSION: CONVERGING SOLUTIONS 10 PROGRAMME Moderator and Speakers Participants 17 Details of ReCAAP Focal Points/ Contact Point
Sample 1
Panel Discussion. TransformUS as a Solution to a Crisis? What Crisis?
Sample 1
Panel Discussion. Tentative list of Panelists: (40 minutes)
Sample 1
Panel Discussion. Could Trade Negotiations Drive Deeper Regulatory Cooperation on Pesticides?
Sample 1
Panel Discussion. Panelists VI. Readiness Assessment Polling Question 3
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Panel Discussion

  • Informal Discussion If an employee has a problem relating to a work situation, the employee is encouraged to request a meeting with his or her immediate supervisor to discuss the problem in an effort to clarify the issue and to work cooperatively towards settlement.

  • Informal Discussions Before a written grievance is submitted, informal discussions will take place between the aggrieved party, the principal or supervisor and Education Minnesota – OSSEO representative. Through these discussions the parties will attempt to resolve the problem. Subd. 2. Level I: If the grievance is not resolved through informal discussions, the aggrieved party may submit the grievance in writing to the principal or supervisor. A copy of such written grievance must simultaneously be filed with Human Resources. The Director, Human Resources will set a meeting date within five (5) days of receipt of the written grievance. The Director, Human Resources will give a written decision on the grievance to the parties involved within ten (10) days after the meeting. Subd. 3. Level II: In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level I, the decision rendered may be appealed to the superintendent of schools, provided such appeal is made in writing within five (5) days after receipt of the decision in Level I. If a grievance is properly appealed to the superintendent, the superintendent or designee will set a time to meet regarding the grievance within fifteen (15) days after receipt of the appeal. Within ten (10) days after the meeting, the superintendent or designee will issue a decision in writing to the parties involved. Subd. 4. Level III: In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level II, the decision rendered may be appealed to the School Board, provided such appeal is made in writing within five (5) days after receipt of the decision in Level II. If a grievance is properly appealed to the School Board, the School Board will set a time to hear the grievance within twenty (20) days after the receipt of the appeal. Within twenty (20) days after the meeting, the School Board will issue its decision in writing to the parties involved. At the option of the School Board, a committee or representative(s) of the School Board may be designated by the School Board to hear the appeal at this level and report its findings and recommendations to the School Board. The School Board will then render its decision.

  • Mutual Discussions The Employer and the Union acknowledge the mutual benefits to be derived from dialogue between the parties and are prepared to discuss matters of common interest.

  • Discussion Staff has reviewed the proposal relative to all relevant policies and advise that it is reasonably consistent with the intent of the MPS. Attachment B provides an evaluation of the proposed development agreement in relation to the relevant MPS policies.

  • Settlement Discussions This Agreement is part of a proposed settlement of matters that could otherwise be the subject of litigation among the Parties hereto. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission of any kind. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and any applicable state rules of evidence, this Agreement and all negotiations relating thereto shall not be admissible into evidence in any proceeding other than to prove the existence of this Agreement or in a proceeding to enforce the terms of this Agreement.

  • Discussions Within 14 days of the date of the notice under Clause 23.2 (Advance Notice) of this article, the Union and the Employer will commence discussions for the purpose of reaching agreement as to the effects of the technological change and in what way, if any, this agreement should be amended.

  • Existing Discussions The Company agrees that it will immediately cease and cause to be terminated any existing activities, discussions or negotiations with any parties conducted heretofore with respect to any Acquisition Proposal. The Company agrees that it will take the necessary steps to promptly inform the individuals or entities referred to in the first sentence hereof of the obligations undertaken in this Section 6.2 and in the Confidentiality Agreement. The Company also agrees that it will (i) promptly request each Person that has heretofore executed a confidentiality agreement in connection with its consideration of acquiring it or any of its Subsidiaries to return or destroy all confidential information heretofore furnished to such Person by or on behalf of it or any of its Subsidiaries and (ii) enforce and not waive the terms of any such confidentiality agreement.

  • Results and Discussion 1H NMR studies of the interaction between three ruthenium polypyridyl complexes and 9-ethylguanine The reaction between the ruthenium polypyridyl complex [Ru(apy)(tpy)(H2O)]2+ and the DNA model base 9-ethylguanine was studied by 1H NMR at a 1:2 ratio (see Fig.3.2). The conditions of the experiment were chosen to be as close as possible to physiological conditions, using D2O as a solvent and a temperature of 310 K. The reaction was studied for 24 hours, during which the pH was seen to remain neutral.

  • Suggestions and Feedback If you provide us with any suggestions, feedback or input (“Customer Input”) related to our Services, we (and our corporate group entities) will own all right, title and interest in and to the Customer Input, even if you have designated the Customer Input as confidential. We and our corporate group entities will be entitled to use the Customer Input without restriction. You assign to us all right, title and interest in and to the Customer Input and agree to provide us with any assistance we may require to document, perfect and maintain our rights in the Customer Input. For this purpose the word: “assign” is legal term which means legally transferring the benefit, such as you legally transferring the benefit of the Customer Input to us.

  • Independent Analysis Each Party hereby confirms that its decision to execute this Agreement has been based upon its independent assessment of documents and information available to it, as it has deemed appropriate.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!