Performance Review and Evaluation Sample Clauses

Performance Review and Evaluation. For distance education courses, classroom observations should model in-class, face- to-face, peer observations as much as possible, commensurate with department practice. The duration of access by the peer observer to the distance education class should be limited to a time period sufficient to allow a window of observation approximating the amount of course content for a single classroom observation; during this period, the observer would view the course from the perspective of the student. The classroom observation should focus on the quality of the educational experience provided by the FACULTY MEMBER, including the organization of the instructional materials associated with the topics covered during the window of observation; the nature of the technological environment itself is not to be included in the evaluation. Whenever possible, the peer observer should have experience with distance education teaching.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance Review and Evaluation. For distance education courses, an appropriate student evaluation instrument shall be developed by local APSCUF, the University management and the appropriate student government body as designated by the President, and approved by local APSCUF and the University management at local meet and discuss. This student evaluation instrument shall be reviewed every four years by local APSCUF, the University management and the appropriate student government body as designated by the President, to ensure its continued effectiveness. The University shall insure that student evaluation instruments are made available to, and completed by students’ at all remote sites.
Performance Review and Evaluation. Employee shall keep Employer informed of progress made toward achievement of stated and agreed upon performance goals on a quarterly basis. In addition, during the first year of employment, Employee shall be subject to a performance evaluation after 3 months (“Probationary Period”). The format of the quarterly and Probationary Period performance review shall be agreed upon by the Employee and Employer within 30 days of the effective date of this Agreement.
Performance Review and Evaluation. Annual Review: Conduct an annual performance review to evaluate the system’s effectiveness in reducing red light violations and improving traffic safety.
Performance Review and Evaluation 

Related to Performance Review and Evaluation

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Performance Reports None Specified

  • Performance Evaluations The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • SCHEDULE FOR PERFORMANCE REVIEWS 7.1 The performance of the Employee in relation to his performance agreement shall be reviewed for the following quarters with the understanding that the reviews in the first and the third quarter may be verbal if performance is satisfactory:

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Performance Reporting The State of California is required to submit the following financial reports to FEMA:

  • Performance Monitoring ‌ A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives. B. County shall periodically evaluate Subrecipient’s progress in complying with the terms of this Contract. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully during such monitoring. County shall report the findings of each monitoring to Subrecipient. C. County shall monitor the performance of Subrecipient against the goals, outcomes, milestones and performance standards required herein. Substandard performance, as determined by County, will constitute non-compliance with this Contract for which County may immediately terminate the Contract. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by Subrecipient within the time period specified by County, payment(s) will be denied in accordance with the provisions contained in this Paragraph 47 of this Contract. D. HUD in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart O, 570.902, will annually review the performance of County to determine whether County has carried out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assisted activities in a timely manner and has significantly disbursed CDBG funds and met the mandated “1.5 ratio” threshold. Subrecipient is responsible to ensure timely drawdown of funds.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!