Review and Evaluation. Before a Fund delegates any aspect of the implementation of this AML Program to a Service Provider, and no less frequently than annually thereafter, the AML Compliance Officer shall review and evaluate the Service Provider's anti-money laundering program as it relates to functions delegated to the Service Provider by the Fund. Each such Service Provider to whom a Fund delegates any aspect of the implementation and operation of this AML Program must have adopted and implemented an anti-money laundering program that complies with all laws, regulations and regulatory guidance applicable to the Fund and such Service Provider as it relates to functions delegated to the Service Provider by the Fund, and should include, at a minimum (to the extent relevant): * know-your-customer policies; * due diligence policies for correspondent accounts for foreign financial institutions and for private banking accounts for non- U.S. persons; * detecting and reporting suspicious activity; * monitoring accounts and identifying high-risk accounts; * a designated compliance officer or committee with responsibility for implementing the anti-money laundering program; * employee training; * an independent audit function; and * recordkeeping requirements. In conducting a review and evaluation of each Service Provider's anti-money laundering program, the AML Compliance Officer shall obtain and consider: * a copy of the Service Provider's anti-money laundering program and any material amendment thereto promptly after the adoption of any such amendment; * a copy of any deficiency letter sent by federal examination authorities concerning the Service Provider's anti-money laundering program; and * no less frequently than annually, a report on the Service Provider's anti-money laundering program that includes a certification to the Fund concerning the Service Provider's implementation of, and ongoing compliance with, its anti-money laundering program and a copy of any audit report prepared with respect to Service Provider's anti-money laundering program. The AML Compliance Officer shall retain records memorializing this evaluation.
Review and Evaluation. 14.1 ACIAR may at any time undertake to review and evaluate the SRA.
14.2 To facilitate any review under clause 14.1 the Commissioned Agent shall promptly provide any financial, technical or such other information as is required by ACIAR and shall at all reasonable times permit persons authorised by ACIAR to have access to the premises upon which the Services are being or have been performed.
Review and Evaluation. 8.1 This MOU should be reviewed every four years from the date of signature to ensure that it is not only current but known and understood by all stakeholders.
8.2 Any party may terminate this MOU by giving at least three months’ notice in writing to the other parties at any time. The checklist attached as Appendix 1 (‘Healthy Partnerships’) may be used in evaluating the quality of the joint working arrangements set out in this MOU.
Review and Evaluation. The Programme shall be evaluated on an annual basis, as shall any possible amendments or changes to the present Agreement.
Review and Evaluation. 1. The Parties shall jointly review the implementation of this Agreement one year after its entry into force and regularly thereafter as jointly agreed. Further, the Parties shall jointly evaluate this Agreement four years after its entry into force.
2. The Parties shall jointly determine in advance the modalities and terms of the joint review and shall communicate to each other the composition of their respective teams. For the purpose of the joint review, the European Union shall be represented by the European Commission, and the United States shall be represented by DHS. The teams may include appropriate experts on data protection and law enforcement. Subject to applicable laws, participants in the joint review shall be required to have appropriate security clearances and to respect the confidentiality of the discussions. For the purpose of the joint review, DHS shall ensure appropriate access to relevant documentation, systems, and personnel.
3. Following the joint review, the European Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. The United States shall be given an opportunity to provide written comments which shall be attached to the report.
Review and Evaluation. 18.1 ACIAR may at any time undertake to review and evaluate the Project.
18.2 ACIAR may within three years of the completion of the Project undertake a review to assess the adoption and uptake of the Project results.
18.3 To facilitate any review under clauses 18.1 and 18.2, the Commissioned Organisation shall promptly provide any financial, technical or such other information as is required by ACIAR and shall at all reasonable times permit persons authorised by ACIAR to have access to the premises upon which the Services are being or have been performed.
Review and Evaluation. A comprehensive and continuing review of completed projects, programmes, and activities financed by the Fund shall be carried out to aid the Board of Directors and the President in determining the effectiveness of the Fund in accomplishing its purposes. The President, with the agreement of the Board of Directors, shall make arrangements for carrying out this review and its results shall be reported through the President to the Board of Directors.
Review and Evaluation. The district shall establish a process to review and evaluate statements of either qualifications or proposals, or both. That process may include a selection board identified by the district or some other panel of evaluators. If appropriate, the reviewers may hear oral presentations by proposers.
Review and Evaluation. There shall be regular six month reviews of the mutual ministry of the congregation and the interim pastor. Those participating in the review may include the named church administrative body, chairs of committees, and the interim pastor. The purposes are to: • Determine progress on goals; • Provide the interim pastor and congregational representatives an opportunity to assess how well they are fulfilling responsibilities and the ministries they share; • Identify and isolate any areas of conflict or disappointment that have not received adequate attention and may be adversely affecting mutual ministry; • Clarify expectations of all parties to help avoid or to deal with any possible future conflicts. A mutually agreed upon third party (Conference staff or designee) may be engaged to facilitate the ministry review process.
Review and Evaluation. Umbra agrees that it will not use the submitted Product other than for the purposes of review and evaluation. Once You provide Umbra with final designs, specifications, drawings and/or prototypes (if applicable), Umbra will commence a review of the feasibility of both production of the Product and its commercial feasibility. You grant Umbra permission to produce, modify and/or use the Product for the purpose of evaluation as Umbra deems appropriate. Umbra employs both internal and external designers to develop new products. Accordingly, it can be found that the submitted Product is the same as or similar to products conceived by Umbra employees or external designers or otherwise acquired by Umbra. Our review and evaluation of the Product shall not be construed as recognition of novelty or originality or non-obviousness of the Product and that we admit Your Product is protected or protectable by Intellectual Property laws. Our review and evaluation is a multi-step process. Umbra is not obligated to keep You informed about the review process. However, You will be notified if and when your Product has been rejected.
