Potential Redirection of Effort Sample Clauses

Potential Redirection of Effort. The PCS continues to not anticipate 33 significant geographic redirection of effort as a result of the formation of the Sector as 34 surveys and Member interviews have indicated that Members intend to continue to fish in 35 approximately the same areas as the most recent prior years. The most likely anticipated 36 changes indicated by Sector Members related to the change in rolling closures approved 37 as part of Amendment 16, which are most likely over time to redirect some effort during 38 May to statistical blocks 130-131 and 136-137, and June to 143-144. Based on the 39 information available to date, however, there did not appear to be any significant changes 40 in effort. 42 If the additional GOM rolling closure exemptions are approved, it is anticipated that 43 some vessels will fish around the inside of the edges of the exempted blocks in May and 1 June in order to gain access to a more steady supply of fish. Members intend to continue 2 to fish primarily in approximately the same areas as the most recent prior years and most 3 of the sector ACE will continue to be taken from the same areas. 5 The 120 days out exemption, 20-day spawning block exemption, and other gillnet 6 exemptions are likely to have different effects for different PCS gillnet vessels. 7 Approximately eight fish from Boothbay and Xxxxx’x harbors in statistical areas 138, 8 139, 146, and 147. It is anticipated that under these exemptions they will continue to fish 9 the same areas but be able to increase their efficiency and stretch out their effort in 10 statistical areas 146 and 147 earlier into April and May, when they currently take time out 11 of the fishery. 13 For the approximately six vessels that fish from Kennebunkport and Cape Porpoise, 14 which fish primarily in areas 139 and 140 year-round, the 120-day block exemption will 15 allow them to fish in these areas during the fall “flanking season,” after September when 16 they currently take time out of the fishery. 18 As indicated in Exhibit B, the PCS does not anticipate that any currently active vessels 19 will not participate in the multispecies fishery in FY 2011, therefore it is unlikely there 20 will be any shift in effort to other fisheries by PCS vessels. 22 The PCS has conducted considerable mapping of historic effort by Members and the 23 Sector Manager will monitor trends and report to NMFS in writing should a significant 24 and adverse shift in effort occur. The Sector Manager may establish additional area or 2...
Sample 1Sample 2See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Potential Redirection of Effort. The Sector anticipates only minimal redirection of effort from the groundfish fishery to other fisheries. One permit holder that will not fish, but will lease Sector ACE to other Sector Members, will fish for xxxxxxx on another vessel. A second permit holder that will lease Sector ACE to other Sector Members will fish primarily for lobster. Neither permit holder participated in the groundfish fishery in the past year. Other permit holders who contribute to the Sector’s ACE will fish for groundfish in the Sector. Specific ports where Members will land fish Except in the “Safe Harbor” provision detailed in this Exhibit, Sector Members will land their catch in the following primary ports: Jonesport, ME; Xxxxx Island, ME; Milbridge, ME; Winter Harbor, ME; Southwest Harbor, ME; Bar Harbor, ME; Bass Harbor, ME; Northeast Harbor, ME; Stonington, ME; Port Xxxxx, ME; New Bedford, MA; Xxxxxxxx, MA; Vineyard Haven, MA; Marshfield, MA, and Sandwich, MA. How to avoid groundfish in other fisheries Sector vessels will not make sector trips (including monkfish, skate, dogfish) in non-exempt fisheries or with non-exempt gear if the sector does not have ACE to cover the groundfish catch (including discards) on those trips. Sector Members who participate in exempted fisheries or fish with exempted gear will not have groundfish catch from those trips counted against ACE, but will continue to be bound by the mortality controls for those fisheries, including the use of days-at-sea." EXHIBIT G: MEMBER FEDERAL PERMITS 232492 unkn 1 D A1 HA YES All permits, mutlispecies or otherwise, that are owned by sector members are included on the above list. No member has any permits on another vessel (Federal or state) not enrolled in the sector. EXHIBIT H: MEMBERS’ STATE PERMITS Maine state licenses held by Sector members Sea urchin/ Sea Permit # MRI # Lobster CFC/CFS: Xxxxxxx
Sample 1Sample 2
Potential Redirection of Effort. 27 During FY 2017 and 2018, the Maine Coast sector experienced a redistribution of effort out of 28 groundfish and into other fisheries. Over the past two fishing seasons some MCCS fishermen 1 shifted all or a portion of their business to: 2 o Lobster 3 o Scallop 4 o Bluefin tuna 5 o Menhaden
Sample 1Sample 2
Potential Redirection of Effort. In the 2014 fishing year there was not significant 13 allocations and corresponding high lease prices, but mostly it is due to the difficulty many Maine 14 fishermen are having finding fish to catch.
Sample 1
Potential Redirection of Effort. Since cuts to allocation that took place at 36 the beginning of the 2013 fishing year there has been significant redirection of effort into 37 other fisheries. This is due in part to low allocations and corresponding high lease prices 38 but mostly it is due to the difficulty many Maine fishermen are having finding fish to 39 catch. 41 During FY 2012, Maine Coast sector vessels switched fishing efforts into the following 42 fisheries: 44 Xxxxxxx, using small mesh 45 Elvers, using dipnets 46 Lobsters, using traps 47 Swordfish, using hook and line 2 During the first quarter of FY 0000, Xxxxx Xxxxx xxxxxx vessels switched fishing efforts 3 into the following fisheries: 5 Lobster, using traps 6 Xxxxxxx, using small mesh 7 Xxxxxxx, using small mesh 9 During FY 2014, Maine Coast sector anticipates a similar redistribution of effort into the 11 avenues to survive considering the allocation cuts they will be facing next year. At this 12 point in time it is difficult to determine what the redistribution of effort will look like next
Sample 1
Potential Redirection of Effort. In the 2014 fishing year there has not been 5 significant redirection of effort into other fisheries compared to 2013. This is due in part to 6 continued low allocations and corresponding high lease prices, but mostly it is due to the 7 difficulty many Maine fishermen are having finding fish to catch. 9 During FY 2013, Maine Coast sector vessels switched fishing efforts into the following fisheries: 11 Scallops, using a dredge 12 Xxxxxxx, using small mesh 13 Elvers, using dipnets 14 Lobsters, using traps 15 Swordfish, using hook and line 17 During the first quarter FY 0000, Xxxxx Xxxxx xxxxxx vessels switched fishing efforts into the 18 following fisheries: 20 Lobster, using traps 21 Scallops, using a dredge 22 Xxxxxxx, using small mesh 23 Xxxxxxx, using small mesh
Sample 1

Related to Potential Redirection of Effort

  • TERMINATION OF EFT SERVICES You may terminate this Agreement or any EFT service under this Agreement at any time by notifying us in writing and stopping your use of your card and any access code. You must return all cards to the Credit Union. You also agree to notify any participating merchants that authority to make xxxx payment transfers has been revoked. We may also terminate this Agreement at any time by notifying you orally or in writing. If we terminate this Agreement, we may notify any participating merchants making preauthorized debits or credits to any of your accounts that this Agreement has been terminated and that we will not accept any further preauthorized transaction instructions. We may also program our computer not to accept your card or access code for any EFT service. Whether you or the Credit Union terminates this Agreement, the termination shall not affect your obligations under this Agreement for any electronic transactions made prior to termination.

  • CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY FOR SYSTEM AGENCY’S TERMINATION COSTS If the System Agency terminates the Contract for cause, the Contractor shall be responsible to the System Agency for all costs incurred by the System Agency and the State of Texas to replace the Contractor. These costs include, but are not limited to, the costs of procuring a substitute vendor and the cost of any claim or litigation attributable to Contractor’s failure to perform any Work in accordance with the terms of the Contract.

  • Employer Responsibility The Employer accepts its responsibility to insure equal opportunity in all aspects of employment for all qualified persons regardless of race, creed, religion, color, national origin, age, disability, reliance on public assistance, sex, marital status, sexual orientation/affectional preference, or any other class or group distinction, as set forth by state or federal anti-discrimination laws, or in Board policy.

  • Termination for Non-Appropriation The continuation of this Contract beyond the current fiscal year is subject to and contingent upon sufficient funds being appropriated, budgeted, and otherwise made available by the City. The City may terminate this Contract, and Contractor waives any and all claim(s) for damages, effective immediately upon receipt of written notice (or any date specified therein) if for any reason the City’s funding from State and/or federal sources is not appropriated or is withdrawn, limited, or impaired.

  • Transition from Existing Evaluation System A) The parties may agree that 50% of more of Educators in the district will be evaluated under the new procedures at the outset of this Agreement, and 50% or fewer will be evaluated under the former evaluation procedures for the first year of implementation of the new procedures in this Agreement.

  • Coordination of Services Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City’s staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times.

  • Replacement of Key Personnel The Engineer must notify the State in writing as soon as possible, but no later than three business days after a project manager or other key personnel is removed from association with this contract, giving the reason for removal.

  • T ermination In the event that either party seeks to terminate this DPA, they may do so by mutual written consent and as long as any service agreement or terms of service, to the extent one exists, has lapsed or has been terminated. The LEA may terminate this DPA and any service agreement or contract with the Provider if the Provider breaches any terms of this DPA.

  • Acknowledgement of Services and Responsibility of the Manager The Resident acknowledges that neither the Manager nor the Institution stands in loco parentis with respect to the Resident. The Residence provides living accommodations for independent students who are to be responsible and accountable for their personal needs and their interactions with their fellow residents as opposed to residential care. The Manager is responsible for the maintenance and operation of the residence. The Manager, in consultation with the Institution, may from time to time, in its sole and unfettered discretion, establish and/or amend policies, protocols and guidelines to uphold and ensure compliance with the standards set forth by the Manager, all of which will constitute part of the Residence Community Living Standards or Institution Code of Conduct, as appropriate. The Resident hereby acknowledges and agrees that they are solely responsible for their compliance with / review of such policies, protocols and guidelines (as may be created, amended, revised or restated by the Manager) found at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.

  • Contractor Certification for Contractor Employees Introduction Texas Education Code Chapter 22 requires entities that contract with school districts to provide services to obtain criminal history record information regarding covered employees. Contractors must certify to the district that they have complied. Covered employees with disqualifying criminal histories are prohibited from serving at a school district. Definitions: Covered employees: Employees of a contractor or subcontractor who have or will have continuing duties related to the service to be performed at the District and have or will have direct contact with students. The District will be the final arbiter of what constitutes direct contact with students. Disqualifying criminal history: Any conviction or other criminal history information designated by the District, or one of the following offenses, if at the time of the offense, the victim was under 18 or enrolled in a public school: (a) a felony offense under Title 5, Texas Penal Code; (b) an offense for which a defendant is required to register as a sex offender under Chapter 62, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure; or (c) an equivalent offense under federal law or the laws of another state. I certify that: NONE (Section A) of the employees of Contractor and any subcontractors are covered employees, as defined above. If this box is checked, I further certify that Contractor has taken precautions or imposed conditions to ensure that the employees of Contractor and any subcontractor will not become covered employees. Contractor will maintain these precautions or conditions throughout the time the contracted services are provided. OR SOME (Section B) or all of the employees of Contractor and any subcontractor are covered employees. If this box is checked, I further certify that: (1) Contractor has obtained all required criminal history record information regarding its covered employees. None of the covered employees has a disqualifying criminal history. (2) If Contractor receives information that a covered employee subsequently has a reported criminal history, Contractor will immediately remove the covered employee from contract duties and notify the District in writing within 3 business days. (3) Upon request, Contractor will provide the District with the name and any other requested information of covered employees so that the District may obtain criminal history record information on the covered employees. (4) If the District objects to the assignment of a covered employee on the basis of the covered employee's criminal history record information, Contractor agrees to discontinue using that covered employee to provide services at the District. Noncompliance or misrepresentation regarding this certification may be grounds for contract termination. None Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 Requirements as of 9-1-2017 SB 807 prohibits construction contracts to have provisions requiring the contract to be subject to the laws of another state, to be required to litigate the contract in another state, or to require arbitration in another state. A contract with such provisions is voidable. Under this new statute, a “construction contract” includes contracts, subcontracts, or agreements with (among others) architects, engineers, contractors, construction managers, equipment lessors, or materials suppliers. “Construction contracts” are for the design, construction, alteration, renovation, remodeling, or repair of any building or improvement to real property, or for furnishing materials or equipment for the project. The term also includes moving, demolition, or excavation. BY RESPONDING TO THIS SOLICITATION, AND WHEN APPLICABLE, THE PROPOSER AGREES TO COMPLY WITH THE TEXAS BUSINESS AND COMMERCE CODE § 272 WHEN EXECUTING CONTRACTS WITH TIPS MEMBERS THAT ARE TEXAS GOVERNMENT ENTITIES. 7 5 Texas Government Code 2270 Verification Form Texas Government Code 2270 Verification Form Texas 2017 House Xxxx 89 has been signed into law by the governor and as of September 1, 2017 will be codified as Texas Government Code § 2270 and 808 et seq. The relevant section addressed by this form reads as follows: Texas Government Code Sec. 2270.002. PROVISION REQUIRED IN CONTRACT. A governmental entity may not enter into a contract with a company for goods or services unless the contract contains a written verification from the company that it: (1) does not boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of the contract engaged by: ESC Region 8/The Interlocal Purchasing System (TIPS) 0000 Xxxxxxx 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx,XX,00000 I verify by this writing that the above-named company affirms that it (1) does not boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of this contract, or any contract with the above-named Texas governmental entity in the future. I further affirm that if our company’s position on this issue is reversed and this affirmation is no longer valid, that the above-named Texas governmental entity will be notified in writing within one (1) business day and we understand that our company’s failure to affirm and comply with the requirements of Texas Government Code 2270 et seq. shall be grounds for immediate contract termination without penalty to the above-named Texas governmental entity. AND Our company is not listed on and we do not do business with companies that are on the the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts list of Designated Foreign Terrorists Organizations per Texas Gov't Code 2270.0153 found at xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxx.xxx/purchasing/docs/foreign-terrorist.pdf I swear and affirm that the above is true and correct. YES

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.