Transition from Existing Evaluation System. The parties may agree that 50% of more of Educators in the district will be evaluated under the new procedures at the outset of this Agreement, and 50% or fewer will be evaluated under the former evaluation procedures for the first year of implementation of the new procedures in this Agreement.
Transition from Existing Evaluation System. The parties shall agree on a process for identifying the Educator Plan that each Educator will be placed on during the Educator’s first year being evaluated under the new procedures, providing that Educators who have received ratings of unsatisfactory or its equivalent in the prior year will be placed on Directed Growth or Improvement Plans at the sole discretion of the Executive Director.
Transition from Existing Evaluation System. A) The parties shall agree on a process for identifying the Educator Plan that each Administrator will be placed on during the Administrator’s first year being evaluated under the new procedures, providing that Administrators who have received ratings of unsatisfactory or its equivalent in the prior year will be placed on Directed Growth or Improvement Plans at the sole discretion of the Superintendent.
B) The existing evaluation system will remain in effect until the provisions set forth in this Article are implemented. The relevant timeframe for adopting and implementing new systems is set forth in 603 CMR 35.11(1).
Transition from Existing Evaluation System. A) The parties may agree that 50% of more of Educators in the district will be evaluated under the new procedures at the outset of this Agreement, and 50% or fewer will be evaluated under the former evaluation procedures for the first year of implementation of the new procedures in this Agreement.
B) The parties shall agree on a process for identifying the Educator Plan that each Educator will be placed on during the Educator’s first year being evaluated under the new procedures, providing that Educators who have received ratings of unsatisfactory or its equivalent in the prior year will be placed on Self-Directed Growth or Improvement Plans at the sole discretion of the Superintendent.
C) The parties agree that to address the workload issue of Evaluators, during the first evaluation cycle under this Agreement in every school or department, the names of the Educators who are being placed on Self-directed Growth Plans shall be literally or figuratively “put into a hat.” The first fifty (50) percent drawn shall be on a 1-year Self- directed Growth Plan and the second fifty (50) percent shall be on a 2-year Plan.
D) The existing evaluation system will remain in effect until the provisions set forth in this Article are implemented. The relevant timeframe for adopting and implementing new systems is set forth in 603 CMR 35.11(1).
Transition from Existing Evaluation System. A. The parties agree to determining a method to reassign Educators to a place in the cycle. PTS Educators may be assigned to Year 1, Year 2, or Year 3. Educators without PTS (NPTS) will be assigned to the next sequential year in their evaluation cycle until they achieve PTS at which point they will be placed on Year 1 for Educators with PTS. Notification to the Educator about the Educator’s placement on the evaluation cycle will be provided by the first day of the school year.
B. The parties shall agree on a process for identifying the Educator Plan that each Educator will be placed on during the Educator's first year being evaluated under the new procedures in this Agreement, providing that Educators who have received ratings of unsatisfactory or its equivalent in the prior year will be placed on Directed Growth or an Improvement Plan of up to one year at the sole discretion of the Superintendent.
C. The existing evaluation system will remain in effect until the provisions set forth in this Article are implemented. The relevant timeframe for adopting and implementing new systems is set forth in 603 CMR 35.11(1).
Transition from Existing Evaluation System. All Educators will be subject to the new evaluation system. B.) All Educators will be rated as proficient in all regards initially.
Transition from Existing Evaluation System. Further consideration
Transition from Existing Evaluation System. The Parties have met and agreed upon a transition process for implementation of the Educator Evaluation System commencing with the 2012-2013 school year, including the identification of those Educators who will be on 1 year and 2 year cycles.
Transition from Existing Evaluation System. A) The parties may agree that 50% of more of Educators in the district will be evaluated under the new procedures at the outset of this Agreement, and 50% or fewer will be evaluated under the former evaluation procedures for the first year of implementation of the new procedures in this Agreement.
B) The parties shall agree on a process for identifying the Educator Plan that each Educator will be placed on during the Educator’s first year being evaluated under the new procedures, providing that Educators who have received ratings of unsatisfactory or its equivalent in the prior year will be placed on Directed Growth or Improvement Plans at the sole discretion of the Superintendent.
C) The existing evaluation system will remain in effect until the provisions set forth in this Article are implemented. The relevant timeframe for adopting and implementing new systems is set forth in 603 CMR 35.11(1).
Transition from Existing Evaluation System. All PTS teachers who are currently in “good standing” (i.e., not on a corrective action plan) shall be considered to be at the Proficient classification. Said teachers shall be started on a self-directed growth plan.
