Procedures and Timeline Sample Clauses

Procedures and Timeline. The Commission shall utilize the following revocation process: a. Notify the school at least 7 days prior to a regularly scheduled meeting that it will be on the agenda for consideration of whether to issue a Notice of Intent to Revoke the Charter. b. Issue a written Notice of Intent to Revoke the Charter within 15 days of voting to issue such a notice. The Notice shall: 1. State the legal basis for the potential revocation, and reasonably identify the evidence that the Commission has to support the existence of the legal basis; 2. Identify the date, location, and time at which a revocation hearing will be held; 3. Establish deadlines for the School and the Commission to present written materials and all evidence that will be used during the hearing; and 4. Identify if the hearing will be conducted by the Commission or by an impartial hearing officer. If a hearing officer is to be used, the Notice shall establish the date on which the Commission will consider whether to accept, reject, or modify the hearing officer’s findings of facts, conclusions of law, and recommendations. c. After a hearing, upon making a final revocation decision, the Commission shall issue a written decision, through the Chair, within 15 days of voting to revoke the charter stating the findings of fact and conclusions of law that support the revocation.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Procedures and Timeline. The Commission shall utilize the following renewal process: a. At least one year prior to the date on which the school will apply for renewal, the Commission’s authorized representatives will notify the school of its preliminary renewal profile, as established in the Commission’s Accountability Plan which is incorporated herein as Attachment A. b. At least 20 days prior to Commission’s meeting at which it will consider the school’s renewal application, the Commission’s authorized representatives will provide the School with a preliminary application analysis and recommendation. The recommendation shall: 1. State the legal basis for potential non-renewal, and reasonably identify the evidence to support the existence of the legal basis; and 2. Establish deadlines for the School to present its written materials and all evidence that will be used to respond to the recommendation, which shall be not less than 10 days from the date of the delivery of the recommendation. c. No later than seven (7) days prior to the Commission’s meeting at which it will consider the school’s renewal application, the Commission’s authorized representatives will provide the school with a final application analysis and recommendation. d. Upon making a final non-renewal decision, the Commission, through the Chair, shall issue a written decision within 30 days of voting to non-renew the charter stating the findings of fact and conclusions of that support the revocation.
Procedures and Timeline. The COMMISSION shall utilize the following revocation process: A. Notify the GOVERNING BOARD and the School at least 72 hours prior to a regularly scheduled or special meeting, or at least 24 hours before an emergency meeting, that consideration of whether to issue a Notice of Intent to Revoke the Charter is on the meeting’s agenda. B. Timely Issue a written Notice of Intent to Revoke the Charter. The Notice shall: 1. State the legal basis for the potential revocation, and reasonably identify the evidence that the COMMISSION has to support the existence of the legal basis; 2. Identify the date, location, and time at which a revocation hearing will be held; 3. Establish deadlines for the GOVERNING BODY and the School to present written materials and all evidence that will be used during the hearing; and 4. Identify if the hearing will be conducted by the COMMISSION or by a third party hearing officer. If a hearing officer is to be used, the Notice shall establish the date on which the COMMISSION will consider whether to accept, reject, or modify the hearing officer’s findings of facts, conclusions of law, and recommendations. C. After a hearing, upon making a final revocation decision, the COMMISSION shall issue a written decision to revoke the Charter.
Procedures and Timeline. The Commission shall utilize the following renewal process: a. At least one year prior to the date on which the school will apply for renewal, the authorized representatives will notify the school of its preliminary renewal profile, as established in the Accountability Plan which is incorporated herein as Attachment A. b. At least 20 days prior to meeting at which it will consider the renewal application, the authorized representatives will provide the School with a preliminary application analysis and recommendation. The recommendation shall: 1. State the legal basis for potential non-renewal, and reasonably identify the evidence to support the existence of the legal basis; and 2. Establish deadlines for the School to present its written materials and all evidence that will be used to respond to the recommendation, which shall be not less than 10 days from the date of the delivery of the recommendation. c. No later than seven (7) days prior to the meeting at which it will consider the renewal application, the authorized representatives will provide the school with a final application analysis and recommendation. d. Upon making a final non-renewal decision, the Commission, through the Chair, shall issue a written decision within 30 days of voting to non-renew the charter stating the findings of fact and conclusions of that support the revocation.
Procedures and Timeline. The COMMISSION shall utilize the following renewal process: A. At least one year prior to the Charter renewal application due date, the COMMISSION’s authorized representatives will notify the School of its preliminary renewal profile, as established in the COMMISSION’s Performance Frameworks, Attachment A. B. At least 20 days prior to COMMISSION’s meeting at which it will consider the renewal application, the COMMISSION’s authorized representatives will provide the School with a preliminary application analysis and recommendation. The recommendation shall: 1. State the legal basis for potential non-renewal, or renewal with conditions and reasonably identify the evidence to support the recommendation; and 2. Establish deadlines for the GOVERNING BODY to present its written materials and all evidence that will be used to respond to the recommendation, which shall be not less than 10 days from the date of the delivery of the recommendation. 3. No later than seven (7) days prior to the COMMISSION’s meeting at which it will consider the renewal application, the COMMISSION’s authorized representatives will provide the School with a final application analysis and recommendation. C. Upon making a final non-renewal decision, or renewal with conditions the COMMISSION shall issue a written decision within 14 days of voting to non-renew Charter, or renew the Charter with conditions.
Procedures and Timeline. The COMMISSION shall utilize the following renewal process: A. At least one year prior to the Charter renewal application due date, the authorized representatives will notify the School of its preliminary renewal profile, as established in the Performance Frameworks, Attachment A. B. At least 2 0 days prior to meeting at which it will consider the renewal application, the authorized representatives will provide the School with a preliminary application analysis and recommendation. The recommendation shall: 1. State the legal basis for potential non-renewal, or renewal with conditions and reasonably identify the evidence to support the recommendation; and 2. Establish deadlines for the GOVERNING BODY to present its written materials and all evidence that will be used to respond to the recommendation, which shall be not less than 1 0 days from the date of the delivery of the recommendation. 3. No later than s even (7) days prior to the meeting at which it will consider the renewal application, the authorized representatives will provide the School with a final application analysis and recommendation. C. Upon making a final non-renewal decision, or renewal with conditions the COMMISSION shall issue a written decision within 1 4 days of voting to non-renew Charter, or renew the Charter with conditions.
Procedures and Timeline. The Commission shall utilize the following renewal process: a. At least one year prior to the date on which the school will apply for renewal, the Commission’s authorized representatives will notify the school of its preliminary renewal profile. b. At least 30 days prior to Commission’s meeting at which it will consider the school’s renewal application, the Commission’s authorized representatives will provide the School with a preliminary application analysis and recommendation. The recommendation shall: 1. State the legal basis for potential non-renewal, and reasonably identify the evidence to support the existence of the legal basis; and 2. Establish deadlines for the School to present its written materials and all evidence that will be used to respond to the recommendation. c. No later than seven (7) days prior to the Commission’s meeting at which it will consider the school’s renewal application, the Commission’s authorized representatives will provide the school with a final application analysis and recommendation. d. Upon making a final non-renewal decision, the Commission, through the Chair, shall issue a written decision within 30 days of voting to non-renew the charter stating the findings of fact and conclusions of that support the revocation.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Procedures and Timeline

  • Claim Procedures Claim forms or claim information as to the subject policy can be obtained by contacting Benmark, Inc. (800-544-6079). When the Named Fiduciary has a claim which may be covered under the provisions described in the insurance policy, they should contact the office named above, and they will either complete a claim form and forward it to an authorized representative of the Insurer or advise the named Fiduciary what further requirements are necessary. The Insurer will evaluate and make a decision as to payment. If the claim is payable, a benefit check will be issued in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. In the event that a claim is not eligible under the policy, the Insurer will notify the Named Fiduciary of the denial pursuant to the requirements under the terms of the policy. If the Named Fiduciary is dissatisfied with the denial of the claim and wishes to contest such claim denial, they should contact the office named above and they will assist in making an inquiry to the Insurer. All objections to the Insurer's actions should be in writing and submitted to the office named above for transmittal to the Insurer.

  • Safety Procedures The Contractor shall: (a) comply with all applicable safety regulations according to Attachment H; (b) take care for the safety of all persons entitled to be on the Site; (c) use reasonable efforts to keep the Site and Works clear of unnecessary obstruction so as to avoid danger to these persons; (d) provide fencing, lighting, guarding and watching of the Works until completion and taking over under clause 10 [Employer's Taking Over]; and (e) provide any Temporary Works (including roadways, footways, guards and fences) which may be necessary, because of the execution of the Works, for the use and protection of the public and of owners and occupiers of adjacent land.

  • Procedures for LNP Request The Parties shall provide for the requesting of End Office LNP capability on a reciprocal basis through a written request. The Parties acknowledge that Verizon has deployed LNP throughout its network in compliance with FCC 96-286 and other applicable FCC Regulations. 15.4.1 If Party B desires to have LNP capability deployed in an End Office of Party A, which is not currently capable, Party B shall issue a LNP request to Party A. Party A will respond to the Party B, within ten (10) days of receipt of the request, with a date for which LNP will be available in the requested End Office. Party A shall proceed to provide for LNP in compliance with the procedures and timelines set forth in FCC 00-000, Xxxxxxxxx 80, and FCC 97-74, Paragraphs 65 through 67. 15.4.2 The Parties acknowledge that each can determine the LNP-capable End Offices of the other through the Local Exchange Routing Guide (LERG). In addition, the Parties shall make information available upon request showing their respective LNP-capable End Offices, as set forth in this Section 15.4.

  • Procurement procedures 11.1 The Recipient must secure the best value for money and shall act in a fair, open and non-discriminatory manner in all purchases of goods and services.

  • Claims Procedures Each Party entitled to be indemnified by the other Party (an “Indemnified Party”) pursuant to Section 8.1 or 8.2 hereof shall give notice to the other Party (an “Indemnifying Party”) promptly after such Indemnified Party has actual knowledge of any threatened or asserted claim as to which indemnity may be sought, and shall permit the Indemnifying Party to assume the defense of any such claim or any litigation resulting therefrom; provided: (a) That counsel for the Indemnifying Party, who shall conduct the defense of such claim or any litigation resulting therefrom, shall be approved by the Indemnified Party (whose approval shall not unreasonably be withheld) and the Indemnified Party may participate in such defense at such party’s expense (unless (i) the employment of counsel by such Indemnified Party has been authorized by the Indemnifying Party; or (ii) the Indemnified Party shall have reasonably concluded that there may be a conflict of interest between the Indemnifying Party and the Indemnified Party in the defense of such action, in each of which cases the Indemnifying Party shall pay the reasonable fees and expenses of one law firm serving as counsel for the Indemnified Party, which law firm shall be subject to approval, not to be unreasonably withheld, by the Indemnifying Party); and (b) The failure of any Indemnified Party to give notice as provided herein shall not relieve the Indemnifying Party of its obligations under this Agreement to the extent that the failure to give notice did not result in harm to the Indemnifying Party. (c) No Indemnifying Party, in the defense of any such claim or litigation, shall, except with the approval of each Indemnified Party which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, consent to entry of any judgment or enter into any settlement which (i) would result in injunctive or other relief being imposed against the Indemnified Party; or (ii) does not include as an unconditional term thereof the giving by the claimant or plaintiff to such Indemnified Party of a release from all liability in respect to such claim or litigation. (d) Each Indemnified Party shall furnish such information regarding itself or the claim in question as an Indemnifying Party may reasonably request in writing and shall be reasonably required in connection with the defense of such claim and litigation resulting therefrom.

  • Review Procedures a. In consultation with the Illinois SHPO, NRCS shall identify those undertakings with little to no potential to affect historic properties and list those undertakings in Appendix A. Upon the determination by the CRS that a proposed undertaking is included in Appendix A, the NRCS is not required to consult further with the SHPO for that undertaking. A list of undertakings with the potential to affect historic properties comprises Appendix B. b. The lists of undertakings provided in Appendices A and B may be modified through consultation and written agreement between the NRCS State Conservationist and the SHPO without requiring an amendment to this Illinois Prototype Agreement. The NRCS State Office will maintain the master list and will provide an updated list to all consulting parties with an explanation of the rationale for classifying the practices accordingly. c. Undertakings identified in Appendix B shall require further review as outlined in Stipulation V. a. The NRCS shall consult with the SHPO to define the undertaking’s APE, identify and evaluate historic properties that may be affected by the undertaking, assess potential effects, and identify strategies for resolving adverse effects prior to implementing the undertaking. 1) NRCS may provide its proposed APE, identification of historic properties and/or scope of identification efforts, and assessment of effects in a single transmittal to the SHPO, provided this documentation meets the substantive standards in 36 CFR Part 800.4-5 and 800.11. 2) The NRCS shall attempt to avoid adverse effects to historic properties whenever possible; where historic properties are located in the APE, NRCS shall describe how it proposes to modify, buffer, or move the undertaking to avoid adverse effects to historic properties. 3) Where the NRCS proposes a finding of "no historic properties affected" or "no adverse effect" to historic properties, the SHPO shall have 30 calendar days from receipt of this documented description and information to review it and provide comments. The NRCS shall take into account all timely comments. i. If the SHPO, or another consulting party, disagrees with NRCS' findings and/or determination, it shall notify the NRCS within the thirty (30) calendar daytime period. The NRCS shall consult with the SHPO or other consulting party to attempt to resolve the disagreement. If the disagreement cannot be resolved through this consultation, NRCS shall follow the dispute resolution process in Stipulation VIII below. ii. If the SHPO does not respond to the NRCS within the thirty (30) calendar day period and/or the NRCS receives no objections from other consulting parties, or if the SHPO concurs with the NRCS' determination and proposed actions to avoid adverse effects, the NRCS shall document the concurrence/lack of response within the review time noted above and may move forward with the undertaking. 4) Where a proposed undertaking may adversely affect historic properties, NRCS shall describe proposed measures to minimize or mitigate the adverse effects, and follow the process in 36 CFR Part 800.6, including consultation with other consulting patties and notification to the ACHP, to develop a Memorandum of Agreement to resolve the adverse effects. Should the proposed undertaking have the potential to adversely affect a known NHL, the NRCS shall, to the maximum extent possible, undertake such planning and actions that may be necessary to minimize harm to the NHL in accordance with 54 U.S.C. § 306107 of the NHPA and 36 CFR Part 800.6 and 800.10, including consultation with the ACHP and respective National Park Service, Regional National Historic Landmark Program Coordinator, to develop a Memorandum of Agreement. d. NRCS will conduct archaeological surveys and will submit reports and other documentation to SHPO for review and comment. When no archaeological sites have been located by the archaeological survey, NRCS may proceed with the proposed undertaking. Reports for negative surveys must be submitted to SHPO on a quarterly basis. All positive and negative reports submitted to SHPO will be sent digitally for submission to the Inventory of Illinois Archaeological Sites (IAS) data file maintained by staff at the Illinois State Museum (ISM) housed under the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). The NRCS further agrees that access to specific site location data will be restricted to the CRS, the NRCS field personnel installing conservation practices adjacent to the cultural resource, and the landowner. Specific site location information for individual projects will be maintained in a secure cultural resources file kept in the field offices and will not be available to the public. e. Curation: NRCS personnel will not collect artifactual material during routine field inspections. However, if a professional survey, evaluation testing, or mitigation is required, NRCS shall ensure that all materials and records resulting from cultural resources surveys or data recovery activities on federal or state property are curated by the Illinois State Museum. The NRCS shall ensure that all records resulting from cultural resource surveys or data recovery activities on private property are curated by the Illinois State Museum or an equivalent curation facility in accordance with 36 CFR Part 79. Subject to the landowner's permission, all objects resulting from cultural resources surveys or data recovery activities are maintained by the Illinois State Museum or equivalent research institution until their analysis is complete and they are returned to their owner(s). Although landowners will be encouraged to donate artifactual material, it is understood that objects collected on private land remain the property of the landowner(s) unless the landowner(s) donates the material to the Illinois State Museum or equivalent research institution. This excludes burial goods, as stipulated by XXXXXX.

  • New Procedures New procedures as to who shall provide certain of these services in Section 1 may be established in writing from time to time by agreement between the Fund and the Transfer Agent. The Transfer Agent may at times perform only a portion of these services and the Fund or its agent may perform these services on the Fund's behalf;

  • Referral Procedures Section 1. For Local Unions now having a job referral system as contained in their Collective Bargaining Agreement, the Contractor agrees to utilize such system and it shall be used exclusively by such Contractor, except as it may be modified by this Article. Referrals shall not be affected by obligations of Union membership or the lack thereof. Where airport security clearance requirements apply to work to be performed, the Contractor shall inform the Union’s hiring hall dispatcher of those requirements when requesting workers. Section 2. In the event that Local Unions are unable to fill any request for employees within the time specified by the local CBAs the Contractor may employ applicants from any other available source. The Contractor shall inform the Union of the name and social security number of any applicants hired from other sources and shall refer the applicant to the Local Union for dispatch to the projects prior to the commencement of work. Section 3. There shall be no discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment because of his/her membership or non-membership in the union or based upon race, creed, color, sex, age or national origin, or any other legally protected class of such employee or applicant. Section 4. No employee covered by this Agreement shall be required to join any Union as a condition of being employed on the project; provided, however, that an employee who is a member of the referring union at the time of the referral shall maintain that membership while employed under the Agreement. All employees shall, however, be required to comply with the union security provision of the applicable Collective Bargaining Agreement, for the period during which they are performing on-site work, except as modified by this Agreement. The Contractor agrees to deduct union dues or representation fees, whichever is applicable, from the pay of any employee who executes a voluntary authorization for such deductions and to remit the dues to the Union or Council. Section 5. The parties agree that where a Contractor is not party to a current Collective Bargaining Agreement with the Union having jurisdiction over the affected work, the Contractor may request by name, and the Local will honor, referral of up to a maximum of five (5) persons per each contractor (“core” employees), provided that the Contractor first demonstrate that those persons possess the following qualifications: (1) Any license required by state or federal law for the project work to be performed; (2) Have worked a total of at least one thousand (1,000) hours in the construction craft during the prior three (3) years; (3) Were on the Contractor’s active payroll for at least sixty (60) out of the one hundred eighty (180) calendar days prior to the contract award; (4) Have the ability to perform the work safely. The Contractor may elect to hire its first “core” employee to be a xxxxxxx. After the contractor hires his first core employee, the Union will refer to such contractor one journeyman employee from the hiring hall out-of–work list for the affected trade or craft, then refer one of such Contractor’s “core” employees as a journeyman, and shall, alternate, one core employee and one employee from the out-of-work list, until such Contractor’s crew requirements are met or until such Contractor has hired five (5) “core” employees, whichever occurs first. Thereafter, all additional employees in the affected trade or craft shall be hired exclusively from the hiring hall out-of-work list(s). For the duration of the Contractor’s work the ratio of “core” employees to hiring hall referrals shall be maintained and when the Contractor’s workforce is reduced, employees shall be reduced in the same ratio as was applied in the initial hiring. All employees, core and union, shall be dispatched from the appropriate union. Trust benefits shall be paid on all employees, core and union. Section 6. Upon referral or dispatch from a Union, “turnaround” or refusal of any worker by the Contractors, requires written explanation from the Contractor that shall be communicated from the Prime Contractor to the Port and affected Union within 48 hours. Section 7. Individual seniority will not be recognized or applied to employees working on the project. This provision will not interfere with or supersede the use by individual Contractors of “call lists” maintained by such Contractor pursuant to addenda to the local Collective Bargaining Agreement between such Contractor and a Union signatory to this Agreement. Section 8. The selection of craft foremen and/or general foremen and the number of such foremen and/or general foremen required shall be entirely the responsibility of the Contractor. Craft foremen shall be designated working foremen at the request of the Contractor. Craft workers covered by this Agreement will, in the normal day- to-day operations, take their direction and supervision from their xxxxxxx.

  • Claims and Review Procedures 6.1 For all claims other than Disability benefits:

  • Quality Control Procedures The Seller shall have an internal quality control program that verifies, on a regular basis, the existence and accuracy of the legal documents, credit documents, property appraisals, and underwriting decisions. The program shall include evaluating and monitoring the overall quality of the Seller's loan production and the servicing activities of the Seller. The program is to ensure that the Mortgage Loans are originated and serviced in accordance with Accepted Servicing Standards and the Underwriting Guidelines; guard against dishonest, fraudulent, or negligent acts; and guard against errors and omissions by officers, employees, or other authorized persons.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!