Process and Criteria Sample Clauses

Process and Criteria. The prioritization of health concerns for the seven county region was conducted using a modified Xxxxxx Method. This method, called the Basic Priority Rating System (BPRS) is recommended by HCI and the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) for the purpose of prioritizing community health needs [4]. Although complex, it is useful when the desired outcome is an objective and replicable list of health priorities based on the baseline data and numerical values. We chose this method as it best fits the data that were acquired using the primary and secondary data sources, and meets the need to establish a process which can be replicated in future assessments. This report presents prioritization results for the region as a whole (i.e. all seven counties together), as well as on an individual county-by-county basis. This method has three principle advantages: • It allows decision-makers to identify explicit factors to be considered in setting priorities; • It organizes the factors into groups that are weighted relative to each other; • It allows the factors to be modified as needed and scored individually. In order to proceed with the Xxxxxx method, indicators were chosen to identify a particular health concern based upon data availability and assessment of data analysts. Each of the 13 health concerns that were identified through the primary and secondary data analysis were then rated on the following criteria according to the Xxxxxx Method: • Size of the health problem = A • Seriousness of the health problem = B • Effectiveness of potential interventions = C The priority scores are calculated using the formula: D= [A+ (2xB)] x C Where D is the final Priority Score. These scores are then ranked to determine the priority order. The seriousness of the health problem is multiplied by two because it is weighted as being twice as important as the size of the problem. The effectiveness of interventions is multiplied by the sum of the size of the problem and two times the seriousness because it is considered the most important of the criteria, as the presence of recommended preventive and clinical interventions are ultimately the way the health problem will be addressed. Based on the priority scores calculated using the above formula, ranks are then assigned to health problems. For the purpose of this CHNA, the method was modified to best fit the data available. The details and procedures used for modification are explained below.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Process and Criteria

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Origin Criteria For the goods that meet the origin criteria, the exporter should indicate in Box 8 of this Form, the origin criteria met, in the manner shown in the following table: Circumstances of production or manufacture in the country named in Box 11 of this form: Insert in Box 8

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Exclusion Criteria Subjects fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for participation in this study.

  • General Criteria a) Approved varieties shall be those varieties recommended by the Department, the Corporation, or those listed in the Atlantic Provinces Field Crop Guide, Publication 100A.

  • Design Criteria and Standards All PROJECTS/SERVICES shall be performed in accordance with instructions, criteria and standards set forth by the DIRECTOR.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference. Adherence to these accessible technology standards is one way to ensure compliance with the College’s underlying legal obligations to ensure that people with disabilities are able to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same benefits and services within the same timeframe as their nondisabled peers, with substantially equivalent ease of use; that they are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any College programs, services, and activities delivered online, as required by Section 504 and the ADA and their implementing regulations; and that they receive effective communication of the College’s programs, services, and activities delivered online.

  • Targets and Milestones You may choose to develop specific additional targets and milestones which assess your performance in ITT over time – particularly if ITT trainees make up a significant proportion of your overall student body. Alternatively, you may have targets and milestones in your existing 2012-13 access agreement which you now also wish to apply to undergraduate and/or postgraduate ITT trainees. These targets may be statistical – based on how representative your entrants are and/or your retention performance – and might include annual or interim milestones to help you monitor whether you are making progress. You may wish to include criteria around the numbers of trainees in receipt of a full or partial maintenance grant, as financial data will need to be collected to determine bursary support and the data will also be accessible through the Student Loans Company for HEBSS subscribers. You may also wish to consider the TDA guidance at Annex C which gives information on specific groups that are Annex A underrepresented in the teaching profession. In this section, please state whether you intend to develop additional targets and milestones, or the extent to which you intend to use targets and milestones in your existing agreement which you now wish to extend to apply to undergraduate and/or postgraduate ITT trainees. Where you have new or amended milestones and targets, you should set these out in your Excel template (Annex B) at Table 6. The University of Cambridge does not intend to adjust its current targets or to develop additional targets and milestones for its ITT provision. The number of students on the PGCE programme amount to less than 4% of the total population of Cambridge students with which the Office for Fair Access is concerned, and all of those students have already experienced a first taste of higher education. It would therefore be disproportionate to set specific aims and objectives for this group.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • Performance indicators and targets The purpose of the innovation performance indicators and targets is to assist the University and the Commonwealth in monitoring the University's progress against the Commonwealth's objectives and the University's strategies for innovation. The University will report principal performance information and aim to meet the innovation performance indicators and targets set out in the following tables.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!