Project Application Process Sample Clauses

Project Application Process. Applications shall be submitted to the technical committee. Applications shall be consistent with the process approved by The Forum. The technical committee will review applications for accuracy and compliance with applicable Forum, DRCOG, State, and Federal rules and regulations pertaining to federal grants and the DRDOG TIP process. The technical committee will assemble the portfolio of projects for the regional and subregional funding rounds and The Forum will vote to approve the final suites of projects for submission to the DRCOG Board of Directors for their respective funding rounds.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Project Application Process. Clarification of the timing of the Application deadline based on the execution of an MSA. The application due date for Subrecipients is now 90 days from execution from the MSA. 3.1.7 Project Application Process: Clarification of authorizing resolution, MSA, and application processes and requirements. An MSA must be executed by a Subrecipient prior to submitting an application to HCD. 3.1.9
Sample 1
Project Application Process. HCD opens the Grants Network Portal to Subrecipients to complete project applications for a period of 90 days following the execution of an MSA. If the Subrecipient cannot meet the application deadline, an extension request must be made by the Subrecipient prior to the deadline and are made on a case-by-case basis. The HCD DR-Infrastructure Manager or Section Chief can approve the extension request. Eligible Applicants must use the Grants Network Portal to submit project applications. Eligible Applicants are limited to submitting project applications that align with the projects submitted in Round 1 or Round 2 of the NOI process and projects must meet the HCD Priority Level LMI/Urgent Need breakdown of the allocation. HCD reviews application submissions and provides a follow-up response to subrecipients including, but not limited to, request for Due Diligence items, if not already requested, feedback, questions, and comments within 60 calendar days of receiving a completed application. The HCD review process ensures compliance with regulatory requirements and confirms the project is consistent with broader recovery goals.
Sample 1
Project Application Process. Applications shall be submitted to Weld County Public Works. Applications shall be consistent with the process approved by The Forum. The Forum will vote to identify a final portfolio of projects and a funding request for submission to DRCOG as the sub-regional recommendation of projects for the TIP.
Sample 1
Project Application Process. The project funding application process is outlined below: • Sub-recipients must complete a Preliminary Homeland Security Grant Project Funding Request (refer to CD), and present their project to the Urban Area Working Group (UAWG). The UAWG will recommend approval or denial to the Steering Committee. • After project is presented to UAWG, Sub-Recipient completes the “Application for Project Funding” and submits it to the Anaheim/Santa Xxx XXXX Xxxxx Office for review and approval (refer to CD). • Sub-Recipient completes the Environmental and Historic Preservation Screening Memo, Coversheet, and required back-up (maps, pictures, descriptions, etc) and attaches to the Application for Project Funding (refer to CD). Note: Not all proposed projects will require an EHP. EHP determination can be made by reviewing the applicable Authorized Equipment List or FEMA’s EHP Policy Guidance (#108-023-1)for training and exercises. • The Grant Steering Committee will review the applications to determine projects approved for funding. • Sub-recipients that have their applications approved for funding will receive an “Award Letter” which will detail the amount of funding that has been approved. FY2015 Anaheim/Santa Xxx UASI Sub-Recipient Grant Guide
Sample 1

Related to Project Application Process

  • Application Process The employees wishing to enter into a job share arrangement will apply in writing to the Employer and forward a copy to the Union outlining the proposed commencement date of the job share, how the hours and days of work will be shared and how communication and continuity of work will be maintained. The Employer shall communicate a decision on a job share request in writing to the applicants. Applications to Job Sharing shall not be unreasonably denied.

  • Negotiation Process (a) If either the Chief Executive Officer of ICANN (“CEO”) or the Chairperson of the Registry Stakeholder Group (“Chair”) desires to discuss any revision(s) to this Agreement, the CEO or Chair, as applicable, shall provide written notice to the other person, which shall set forth in reasonable detail the proposed revisions to this Agreement (a “Negotiation Notice”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the CEO nor the Chair may

  • Application Procedure 7.4.1. Application Priority........................................ 7.4.2. [Reserved].................................................. 7.4.3. Advance Payments............................................

  • Selection Process The Mortgage Loans were selected from among the outstanding one- to four-family mortgage loans in the Seller's portfolio at the related Closing Date as to which the representations and warranties set forth in Subsection 9.02 could be made and such selection was not made in a manner so as to affect adversely the interests of the Purchaser;

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!