Project Selection. Based on the results of project identification and prioritization actions, provide support in developing and maintaining a project pipeline that aligns with the strategic priorities of the organization. The results of this effort will be the creation and maintenance of a project portfolio.
Project Selection. The City and Council agree that each individual subregional council and the City shall establish its own points-based methodology for selecting projects and that a minimum of 25% of those points shall be allocated to regional priorities:
x. Xxxxx Infrastructure. Points awarded to projects that use green infrastructure to manage stormwater.
ii. Reinvestment. Points awarded to projects that serve a reinvestment area as defined in ON TO 2050.
iii. Multi-modal freight movement. Points awarded to projects that benefit freight movement.
iv. Economically disconnected areas. Points awarded to projects that improve equity through benefits to economically disconnected areas as defined in ON TO 2050.
Project Selection. The Governance Committee may delegate the authority to identify projects to be considered for financing by the Trust to the Trust Administrator, provided however that final authority to approve projects for funding will be retained by the Governance Committee. In determining the projects to be financed from the Trust, the Governance Committee shall apply the requirements of Certificate Condition 165 to determine whether project proposals are related to the Xxxxxx River, Harlem River, East River or Lake Champlain, respectively, and within the purpose of the Certificate Conditions and this Agreement.
Project Selection. All projects under the Communities Component will be selected jointly by the Parties through a competitive, applicationbased process in accordance with joint criteria to be set out in the Communities Funding Agreement. Such criteria will include the requirement that all Approved Projects fall under one of the BCF Eligible Categories. All applications under the Communities Component must be endorsed, in writing, by the appropriate order of government.
Project Selection. 3.1 The Service Manager shall evaluate, or shall have evaluated, each Project in accordance with the requirements of the Program Guidelines.
3.2 The Service Manager shall submit to the Minister a list of Council or delegated authority approved Projects with recommended Funding requirements based on the submitted Program Delivery and Fiscal Plan and within the Service Manager’s notional allocation.
3.3 In respect of each Project, the Service Manager shall submit a Project Information Form and the appropriate Funding Schedule to the Minister for approval.
3.4 If the Minister approves the Project, the Minister shall issue a Conditional Letter of Commitment to the Proponent and shall advise the Service Manager of the approval of the Project.
3.5 The Funding shall be allocated to the Projects at the discretion of the Minister.
3.6 The Service Manager shall advise and request approval from the Minister for any changes to the Projects which may affect the number of Units or the Funding requirements for the Service Manager and the Project.
3.7 The Minister may change the allocation of Funding to a Project in response to a change in the Project.
3.8 The Service Manager shall approve Projects in accordance with policies it has adopted respecting the procurement of goods and services, as required by the Xxxxxxxxx Xxx, 0000.
3.9 A Service Manager who utilizes the municipality or a municipal non-profit housing corporation to deliver Units under the Program is not required to use a procurement process to solicit the municipality or the municipal non- profit housing corporation as a Proponent, but the municipality or municipal non-profit housing corporation shall award contracts to build Units using procurement practices authorized by the Service Manager.
Project Selection. Project selection is the procedure followed by MPOs, States, and public transportation operators to advance projects from the first 4 years of an approved TIP and/or STIP to implementation. ARC maintains a six-year TIP for the Atlanta MPA. The RTP is the official multimodal transportation plan addressing no less than a 20-year planning horizon that the MPO develops, adopts, and updates through the metropolitan transportation planning process. The financially constrained, staged, multi-year intermodal program of transportation projects covering a metropolitan planning area that is consistent with the RTP. The MPO, in cooperation with the State(s) and any affected public transportation operator(s), shall develop a TIP for the metropolitan planning area. The TIP shall reflect the investment priorities established in the current metropolitan transportation plan and shall cover a period of no less than 4 years, be updated at least every 4 years, and be approved by the MPO and the Governor (or his/her designee per state law). For the Atlanta TIP, the Governor’s approval was delegated to the Georgia Regional Transportation Authority in June 2000 by an Executive Order of the Governor. The TIP must then be incorporated directly or by reference into the State TIP. The document developed and adopted by the MPO that forms a statement of work identifying the planning priorities and activities to be carried out within a metropolitan planning area. The UPWP includes a description of the planning work and resulting products, who will perform the work, time frames for completing the work, the cost of the work, and the source(s) of funds.
Project Selection. To reflect a range of project types from initial proof of concepts which do not involve IBM to more complex collaborative engagements three classes of projects: type 1, type 2 and type 3 are defined. Each of these project types may involve industrial collaborators.
Project Selection. Eighty-nine research projects were selected from 2013 to present under this grant. Projects have been selected for the original grant, Modification 1, 2, and 3. The projects reflect substantial input and matching resources from state departments of transportation and MPOs in the region. Collectively, this set of projects addresses all five of the Secretary’s strategic goals and several of USDOT’s requested emphasis areas under State of Good Repair—e.g., (1) bridge condition monitoring, (2) locating critical infrastructure defects, (3) identifying tools to prevent and detect corrosion in transportation infrastructure, (4) analytical tools for infrastructure performance management, and (5) methods and criteria to measure performance of new materials and methods. Other research projects are related to the Secretary’s strategic goals of Safety, Economic Competiveness, Livable Communities, and Environmental Sustainability. MPC projects selected under this grant include; MPC-409, MPC-446 to MPC-532.
1. MPC-453: Speed Selection Behavior during Winter Road Conditions
2. MPC-454: Regional Implementation of Tribal Transportation Safety Program
3. MPC-455: Why Are Bike-Friendly Cities Safer for All Road Users?
4. MPC-458: Application of a Multi-Agent System with the Large-Scale Agent-Based Model for Freight Demand Modeling
5. MPC-461: Analytical Modeling for Progressive Failure Assessment of Curved and Skewed Highway Bridges Subjected to Seismic Hazards
6. MPC-462: Implementation of Aerial LiDAR Technology to Update Highway Feature Inventory
7. MPC-467: Self-Regulation and Distraction
8. MPC-471: Enhancement of Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide for Roadway Design, Construction and Rehabilitation
9. MPC-472: Developing an Optimization Model for Managing County Paved Roads
10. MPC-473: Bicycle and Pedestrian Design for Rural Communities
11. MPC-474: Highway Safety Manual Part D: Validation and Application in Wyoming
12. MPC-475: Analysis of the Relationship of Roadside Inspections on Large Truck Crashes
13. MPC-476: Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Traffic Hazard Forecasting Model
14. MPC-479: Modeling Multi-class Truck Traffic Assignment Method with Different Traffic Restraint Constraints
15. MPC-480: A Comprehensive Safety Assessment Methodology for Innovative Geometric Designs
16. MPC-483: Interaction Analysis of Girder Bridges and Traffic System subjected to Earthquakes
17. MPC-486: Sustainable Heated Pavements for Infrastructure Longevity, Safety and Economic...
Project Selection. Following written request from the municipality, the Planning Commission will make a determination as to whether there is staff expertise and capacity to conduct the requested project and if the project is consistent with and advances Landscapes3. If the project is not selected to advance through the Technical Assistance Agreement process, the Planning Commission will coordinate with the municipality regarding the reasons why and potential avenues to advance the project.
Project Selection. Seventy-twoy research projects were selected from 2013 to present under this grant. Projects have been selected for the original grant, Modification 1 and 2 while projects are still being submitted for the Modification 3 to the original grant. Thus the peer review process is ongoing for possible selection. The projects reflect substantial input and matching resources from state departments of transportation and MPOs in the region. Collectively, this set of projects addresses all five of the Secretary’s strategic goals and several of USDOT’s requested emphasis areas under State of Good Repair—e.g., (1) bridge condition monitoring,
