Project Experience and References Sample Clauses

Project Experience and References. Our firm is a national leader in providing organizational and technology review, strategy, and roadmap consulting services to public safety agencies. FE has assisted numerous state and local public safety organizations in assessing their technology assets, providing best practice guidance and preparing plans for decision-making by our clients. Our team has extensive experience conducting assessments, documenting, analyzing, and benchmarking technology, evaluating data exchange options, and evaluating the expected technical, operational, and budgetary impact of service delivery scenarios. We have provided these services to government agencies in all regions of the United States, including statewide projects highlighted in the table below. We have developed structured, repeatable methods that give our clients the facts and data needed to make well-informed decisions. We have proven techniques and tools that add value for our clients and their projects. The table below summarizes examples of our projects, indicating when FE provided the 12 Management Consulting Services requested by the State of Florida on specific projects. Following the table, we provide reference projects to demonstrate the depth and quality of our Management Consulting Services. MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES ON RECENT FEDERAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS Mgt. Strategy Project Mgt. Program Research Studies, Analyses, Reports Executive/Mgt. Consulting Training Policy & Regulations Process/ Productivity Expert Witness Mission Critical Business Program Systems Alignment & Consolidation Grants Mgt. FE Relevant Projects Alachua County, Florida LMR Consulting Arizona, State of, NG9-1-1 Consulting Black & Xxxxxx Product Litigation California, State of, NG9-1-1 Consulting Charleston County, South Carolina ECC Technology/Consolidation Consulting Collier County, Florida LMR Consulting Colorado, State of, LMR Consulting Connecticut, State of, NG9-1-1 Consulting Delaware, State of, NG9-1-1 Consulting DHS SICP Workshops NG9-1-1 Consulting DHS/SPAWAR NG9-1-1 Consulting Florida, State of, NG9-1-1 Consulting Gainesville Regional Utility, LMR Consulting Guilford County, North Carolina ECC Technology/Consolidation Consulting Gwinnett County, Georgia ECC Consulting Idaho, State of, NG9-1-1 Consulting Indiana Wireless Board NG9-1-1 Consulting Iowa, State of, LMR Consulting
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Project Experience and References

  • GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND SECTOR SPECIFIC ALLOWANCES, CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS The following allowances and conditions shall apply where relevant: Where the company does work which falls under the following headings, the company agrees to pay and observe the relevant respective conditions and/or exceptions set out below in each case.

  • General Experience The Applicant shall meet the following minimum criteria: -

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • Geological and Archeological Specimens If, during the execution of the Work, the Contractor, any Subcontractor, or any servant, employee, or agent of either should uncover any valuable material or materials, such as, but not limited to, treasure trove, geological specimens, archival material, archeological specimens, or ore, the Contractor acknowledges that title to the foregoing is vested in the Owner. The Contractor shall notify the Owner upon the discovery of any of the foregoing, shall take reasonable steps to safeguard it, and seek further instruction from the Design Professional. Any additional cost incurred by the Contractor shall be addressed under the provision for changed conditions. The Contractor agrees that the Geological and Water Resources Division and the Historic Preservation Division of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources may inspect the Work at reasonable times.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 The evaluation of the Employee’s performance will form the basis for rewarding outstanding performance or correcting unacceptable performance.

  • Work Experience Formula hour equivalents will be given on the basis of the following number of students enrolled at fourth week census: 5-14 students enrolled = 1 (one) formula hour 15-24 students enrolled = 2 (two) formula hours 25-34 students enrolled = 3 (three) formula hours

  • For Product Development Projects and Project Demonstrations  Published documents, including date, title, and periodical name.  Estimated or actual energy and cost savings, and estimated statewide energy savings once market potential has been realized. Identify all assumptions used in the estimates.  Greenhouse gas and criteria emissions reductions.  Other non-energy benefits such as reliability, public safety, lower operational cost, environmental improvement, indoor environmental quality, and societal benefits.  Data on potential job creation, market potential, economic development, and increased state revenue as a result of the project.  A discussion of project product downloads from websites, and publications in technical journals.  A comparison of project expectations and performance. Discuss whether the goals and objectives of the Agreement have been met and what improvements are needed, if any.

  • Management of Special and Technical Environment Each certificated support person demonstrates an acceptable level of performance in managing and organizing the special materials, equipment and environment essential to the specialized programs.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • INTERNET PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS ‌ Job Title: Internet/Web Engineer Job#: 2620 General Characteristics Integrally involved in the development and support of all Internet/Intranet/Extranet sites and supporting systems. Works closely with other IT groups and customers to define the system design and user interface based on customer needs and objectives. Participates in all phases of the development and implementation process, and may act as a project manager on special projects. Ensures the integration of the Web servers and all other supporting systems. Responsible for system tuning, optimization of information/data processing, maintenance and support of the production environment.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!