Promotion Review. In the year in which a non-tenure track faculty member applies for promotion, a formal review shall take place at the department, college/school/unit and University level following the procedures outlined in Section 5.f of this Article except that there shall be no “arms length” external evaluations solicited for non-tenure track faculty who have been solely engaged in teaching, advising and service. However, approved unit guidelines may specify a requirement for external evaluations other than “arms length." A review of the promotion dossier for reappointment of the candidate will simultaneously occur and take place at the department and College/School/Unit level. If a negative reappointment decision is made, the promotion process will terminate at the College/School/Unit level.
Promotion Review. In cases where promotion is denied, the candidate may request a written statement of the reasons for such a decision, which the Chief Librarian shall supply within five working days. A request for the review of a promotion decision may be made to the Chief Librarian within fifteen working days of notification of reasons for a negative decision. This request will be granted only if the Chief Librarian deems the review appropriate. If the Chief Librarian grants this request the review will be conducted by the same committee.
Promotion Review. The appointment of faculty to newly reclassified positions will be at the lowest rank of the classification. Prior service to the University in either ADJUNCT or CAREER positions will count toward a faculty member’s eligibility for promotion. Faculty members with six or more years of service prior to AY 2013-14 with an average appointment of at least .4 FTE will be eligible to be considered for promotion to the next rank during AY 2013-14 following Article 19. Faculty members who are successfully promoted to the next rank within their classification who have more than six years of service at.4 FTE or greater may count these additional years toward their eligibility to be considered for promotion to the next highest rank. For example, if a faculty member has nine years of service as an adjunct and is appointed to a CAREER position, then she or he may be considered for promotion immediately. If the faculty member is promoted, then she or he will have three years toward promotion to the next level and so may be considered for the next promotion in the third year following the first promotion. Faculty members considered under this MOU with fewer than six years of prior service may count these years toward future promotion eligibility. Dated: November , 2013. UNIVERSITY OF OREGON Dated: November , 2013. UNITED ACADEMICS Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, President Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Professor, German and Scandinavian Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Vice President for Finance and Administration & CFO Xxx Xxxxxxxx, Senior Instructor, Xxxxxxxxx College of Business Xxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxx, School of Journalism and Communication Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Associate Professor, Women’s and Gender Studies/International Studies Xxxx Xxxxxx, Senior Vice Xxxxxxx for Academic Affairs Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Instructor, Political Science Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Associate Professor, Religious Studies Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Spokesperson Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Research Associate, Psychology Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Instructor, Special Education Xxxxx Xxxxx, Professor, Philosophy Xxxx Xxxxx, Professor, Romance Languages Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Spokesperson Xxxxx Xxxxx, Spokesperson MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN: United Academics (UA) AND: University of Oregon (UO) RE: Joint Committee Regarding Intellectual Property Article
Promotion Review. The appointment of faculty to newly reclassified positions 22! will be at the lowest rank of the classification. Prior service to the University in either 23! ADJUNCT or CAREER positions will count toward a faculty member’s eligibility for 24! promotion. Faculty members with six or more years of service prior to AY 2013-14 with 25! an average appointment of at least .4 FTE will be eligible to be considered for promotion 26! to the next rank during AY 2013-14 following Article 19. Faculty members who are 27! successfully promoted to the next rank within their classification who have more than six 28! years of service at.4 FTE or greater may count these additional years toward their 29! eligibility to be considered for promotion to the next highest rank. For example, if a 30! faculty member has nine years of service as an adjunct and is appointed to a CAREER 31! position, then she or he may be considered for promotion immediately. If the faculty 32! member is promoted, then she or he will have three years toward promotion to the next 33! level and so may be considered for the next promotion in the third year following the first 34! promotion. Faculty members considered under this MOU with fewer than six years of 35! prior service may count these years toward future promotion eligibility. 36! ! ! !1! !2! !3! MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 4! 5! BETWEEN: United Academics (UA) 6! 7! AND: University of Oregon (UO) 8! !9! RE: Joint Committee Regarding Intellectual Property Article 10! !11! RECITALS: 12! !13! A. UA and UO have reached an agreement on an initial collective bargaining agreement. 14! That agreement does not address the subject of Intellectual Property. 15! !16! B. The parties desire to address the subject of Intellectual Property on the following 17! terms. 18! !19! AGREEMENTS: 20! !21! 1. Within 30 days of the ratification of the collective bargaining agreement, each 22! party will designate three persons to participate in discussions designed to produce 23! agreement on the full range of issues raised at the bargaining table with respect to 24! proposed Article 51, Intellectual Property. Recommendations produced by this working 25! group will be forwarded to the University and to United Academics for possible revision 26! and approval. Any agreement reached will be incorporated into the collective bargaining 27! agreement as memoranda of understanding. 28! !29! 2. Until final approval of any agreement by the parties and its incorporation into the 30! ...
Promotion Review
