Proposed Merger. After the Proposed Merger, the Bank shall succeed to all of the rights, duties and obligations of WFS, in its individual capacity, as well as in its capacity as Seller, as Master Servicer and as Administrator, as the case may be, under each of the Underwriting Agreement, the Letter Indemnity Agreement and each Basic Document, as applicable.
Proposed Merger. The following subsection (d) is hereby added to Section 3 of the Rights Agreement in its appropriate position:
Proposed Merger. 1.1 Reference is made to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) entered into as of February 4th, 2016, by and among Suzhou Dongshan Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd., a company organized under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (“Parent”), Dragon Electronix Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”) and Multi-Fineline Electronix, Inc., a Delaware corporation in which United Engineers Limited (“UEL”) holds indirectly approximately 60.2% of the existing issued share capital (the “Company”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company with the Company continuing as the Surviving Corporation (the “Merger”) to be solely owned by Parent and stockholders of the Company will be entitled to a consideration of US$23.95 per share in cash.
Proposed Merger. On August 23, 2006, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Solar Power, Inc., a California corporation (“Solar Power”), and the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Welund Acquisition, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which it is contemplated that the Merger Sub will be merged with and into Solar Power with Solar Power surviving as the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Merger”). Additional information regarding the Merger and Solar Power is disclosed on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 29, 2006.
Proposed Merger. 3.1 On and from the earlier of (a) the expiry of 18 (eighteen) months from the First Closing Date or (b) the date on which Calpian infuses Initial Funding and Future Funding of upto U.S.D. 9,700,000 (U.S. Dollars Nine Million Seven Hundred Thousand) in accordance with the SSSHA, Parties hereby agree and undertake that Calpian has an option to merge Company into MMPL if and when the Indian regulations permit the foreign direct investment into the business activities into which MMPL is involved (such status would be referred to as “Merger Status”). When Calpian opts for such merger, subject to the approval of the Government Authority, if required, the Parties shall forthwith cause the merger of the Company into MMPL. To determine whether the Merger Status has been achieved or not, every 6 (six) months from the date hereof, Parties shall in good faith review the Merger Status. Subject to conditions stated above, Calpian shall have the right to exercise the option for the merger at any time within a period of 6 (six) years from the First Closing Date.
Proposed Merger. Micro and each of the Principal Stockholders agree that the consideration for the Proposed Merger (the Proposed Merger Consideration") shall be the following: (a) Ninety Percent (90%) of the net revenues (sales) of Enon for calendar year 2001, minus (b) current and long-term liabilities of Enon at December 31, 2001 and certain other adjustments, including, but not limited to: (i) Enon's liabilities to Acquisition Services, Inc. for its services related to the Proposed Merger; (ii) a warranty reserve of Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000); (iii) estimated and unpaid legal fees of Enon relating to the Proposed Merger; (iv) estimated and unpaid accounting fees of Enon relating to an audit of Enon's Fiscal Year 2001 financial statements; (v) a five percent (5%) of the amount of accounts receivable of Enon at December 31, 2001; (vi) a fifteen percent (15%) of the amount of inventory of Enon at December 31, 2001; (vii) accrued and unpaid state and federal income taxes for Enon for 2001; (viii) $20,000 as a credit for any liability associated with a license for accelerometers; and (ix) the estimated and unpaid cost of any environmental cleanup or report of Enon. (c) The Proposed Merger Consideration shall be payable: (i) $750,000 by delivery of 182,500 shares of Common Stock of Micro; and (ii) the balance in cash. (d) The Proposed Merger Agreement shall include other terms and conditions standard in agreements of this type, including, but not limited to, (i) a one year part-time consulting agreement for Harold S. Maddix providing xxx xxxxxxxxxxxx of $75,000; (ii) a one year employment agreement for Don F. Kilduff, providing fxx xxxxxx xxxxensation similar to his current salary and benefits plus incentive compensation to be negotiated in good faith between Mr. Kilduff and Richard S. Xxxxx, Xxxxident xx Xxxxx; (xxx) leaving at least $50,000 in cash at Enon at the closing of the Proposed Merger; and (iv) an agreement for the surviving corporation to enter into a two year lease to occupy the premises owned by the Enon Nominee Trust on the same terms and conditions as currently in place. 2.
Proposed Merger. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, (i) no Distribution Date, Stock Acquisition Date or Flip-In Event shall be deemed to have occurred, (ii) neither iXL Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("iXL"), nor any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates shall be deemed to have become an Acquiring Person and (iii) no holder of Rights shall be entitled to any rights or benefits pursuant to Section 7, 11, or 13 or any other provision of this Agreement, in each case by reason of (w) the approval, execution, delivery and performance of the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") dated July 31, 2001 among the Company, iXL, India-Sierra Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, India Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Sierra Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (x) the approval, execution, delivery and performance of the Scient Voting Agreement (the "Voting Agreement") dated July 31, 2001 among iXL and the stockholders of the Company listed on the signature pages thereto, (y) the approval of the Merger Agreement by the stockholders of the Company or (z) the consummation of the Mergers (as such term is defined in the Merger Agreement) or any of the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement or the Voting Agreement."
Proposed Merger. On May 17, 2007, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among the Company, Aladdin Solutions, Inc. (f/k/a Aladdin Holdco, Inc., “Parent”) and Aladdin Merger Sub, Inc. (“Merger Sub” and together with Parent, the “Blackstone Entities”) (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company was to be acquired by affiliates of The Blackstone Group L.P. (the “Merger”). On January 25, 2008, Parent informed the Company in a written notice that it did not anticipate the condition to closing the Merger relating to obtaining approvals from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency would be satisfied. On January 30, 2008, the Company filed a lawsuit against the Blackstone Entities in the Delaware Court of Chancery, seeking specific performance to compel the Blackstone Entities to comply with their obligations under the Merger Agreement, including their covenants to obtain required regulatory approvals and to consummate the Merger. On February 8, 2008, the Company filed a motion to dismiss this lawsuit without prejudice in response to the Blackstone Entities’ confirmation of their commitment to work to consummate the Merger. On March 17, 2008, the Company notified the Blackstone Entities that they were in breach of the Merger Agreement and demanded that the Blackstone Entities cure the breaches including, among other things, obtaining required regulatory approvals from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. On April 18, 2008, Parent repudiated the Merger Agreement by sending the Company a notice purporting to terminate the contract. The notice of termination was ineffective because the Merger Agreement cannot be terminated under the relevant termination provision by a party that is in breach. Subsequently, on April 18, 2008, the Company terminated the Merger Agreement because of the Blackstone Entities’ repudiation and their refusal to timely cure their breaches and perform their covenants and agreements, thereby causing specified closing conditions not to be satisfied. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, if the Company terminates the Merger Agreement as a result of Parent or Merger Sub’s breach or failure to perform that causes specified closing conditions not to be satisfied, Parent is required to pay, or cause to be paid, to the Company a fee of $170.0 million (the “Business Interruption Fee”). Blackstone Capital Partners V L.P. (“BCP V”) provided a limited guarantee pursuant to which...
Proposed Merger. (a) We refer to the memorandum dated 28 September from the Company setting out details of the proposed merger between UTi (US) Holdings Inc and UTi (US) Logistics Holdings Inc as part of a solvent reorganisation of the Group (the Merger).
Proposed Merger. (a) The Members hereby deem it advisable and in the best interest of the Company that the Company enter into the Agreement and Plan of Merger between the Company and North American Terminals, Inc., a California corporation, a form of which has been presented to the Members (the "MERGER AGREEMENT"). The Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are, and each of them hereby is, authorized and approved in all material respects; and the Officers are, and each of them hereby is, authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the Company the Merger Agreement with such changes therein and additions or amendments thereto, and any and all ancillary documents, in such form as the Officer or Officers executing any of the Merger Agreement or such ancillary documents shall approve, such Officer's execution thereof to be conclusive evidence of such approval.
