QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the Plan of Allocation to the extent necessary to ensure that it is fully and fairly implemented. EXHIBIT D State Street ERISA Settlement Administrator P.O. Box 200_ Chanhassen, MN 55317-200_ www. com FORMER PARTICIPANT ROLLOVER FORM ABC1234567890 XXXX Q CLASSMEMBER 000 XXXX XX APT 1 ANYTOWN, ST 12345 Claim Number: 1111111 PIN: a!b@c#d$ This Former Participant Rollover Form is ONLY for Class Members who are Former Participants, or the beneficiaries or alternate payees of Former Participants (all of whom will be treated as Former Participants). A Former Participant is a Class Member who does not have a Plan account with a balance greater than $0.00 as of the date of the Final Approval Order. Former Participants that would like to elect to receive their settlement payment through a rollover to a qualified retirement account must complete, sign, and mail this form with a postmark on or before 14 days before Fairness Hearing, , 2024. Please review the instructions below carefully. Former Participants who do not complete and timely return this form will receive their settlement payment by a check payable to them. If you have questions regarding this form, you may contact the Settlement Administrator as indicated below: WWW. .COM OR CALL [PHONE NUMBER] ******************************************************************************************************************************
QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the Plan of Allocation to the extent necessary to ensure it is fully and fairly implemented. EXHIBIT D United States District Court Middle District Of Florida Orlando Division XXXXXX XXXXXX, XXXXXX XXXX, XXXX X. XXXXXX, XXXXXX X. XXXX, XXXXX XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX X. XXXXXXXX, AND XXXX XXXXXXX, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs,
QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the Plan of Allocation to the extent necessary to ensure that it is fully and fairly implemented. EXHIBIT E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the Plan of Allocation to the extent necessary to ensure that it is fully and fairly implemented. EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA XXXXX XXXXXX and XXXX X. XXXXXXXX individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. LAND O’LAKES, INC., THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LAND O’LAKES, INC., LAND O’LAKES, INC. RETIREMENT PLAN COMMITTEE, and XXXX DOES 1-30. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 0:20-cv-01253-DSD-HB ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, PRELIMINARILY CERTIFYING A CLASS FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES, APPROVING FORM AND MANNER OF SETTLEMENT NOTICE, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION AND SCHEDULING A DATE FOR A FAIRNESS HEARING This action involves claims for alleged violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (“ERISA”), with respect to the Land O’Lakes Employee Savings and Supplemental Retirement Plan (“Plan”).1 The terms of the Settlement are set out in the Settlement Agreement, fully executed as of February 28, 2022, by counsel on behalf of the Named Plaintiffs, all Class Members, and Defendants, respectively. Pursuant to the Named Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, Preliminary Certification of a Class for Settlement Purposes, Approving Form and Manner of Settlement Notice, Preliminarily Approving Plan of Allocation, and Scheduling a Date for a Fairness Hearing filed on February 28, 2022, the Court preliminarily considered the Settlement to determine, among other things, whether the Settlement is sufficient to warrant the issuance of notice to members of the proposed Settlement Class. Upon reviewing the Settlement Agreement and the matter having come before the Court at the hearing, due notice having been given and the Court having been fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:
QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION. A. In light of the manner in which the data are kept and the ease with which they may be manipulated, it may be appropriate to simplify some of the features of these calculations. Such simplifications are acceptable as long as the two basic features of the distribution are preserved: (1) each Participant shall receive a share of the Net Settlement Fund based approximately on the decline in the value of Avon Stock he or she held in his or her Plan account over the Settlement Class Period in comparison with the decline in value of Avon Stock held by others in the Plan; and (2) the distribution shall take place from the Qualified Settlement Fund so as to realize any tax advantage of investment in the Plan. Any material changes will be presented to the Court for approval pursuant to Section IV.B below, and any unresolvable objections to the Settlement Administrator’s calculations shall also be presented to the Court pursuant to Section IV.B below.
QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION. A. Depending on the manner in which the data is kept and the ease with which it can be manipulated, it may be appropriate to simplify some of the features of these calculations. Such simplifications are acceptable as long as the two basic features of the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund are preserved: (1) that each Settlement Class Member receives a proportionate share of the Net Settlement Fund based approximately on the decline in the value of the Xxxxxx Xxx Stock Fund held in the Settlement Class Member’s account over the Class Period in comparison with the decline in value of the Company Stock Fund held by all other Settlement Class Members; and (2) that the individual’s share of the Net Settlement Fund is disbursed by check. Any such changes will be presented to the Court for approval pursuant to Section IV.B below.
QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION. A. In light of the manner in which the data are kept and the ease with which they may be manipulated, it may be appropriate to simplify some of the features of these calculations. Such simplifications are acceptable as long as the two basic features of the distribution are preserved: (1) each Participant shall receive a share of the Net Settlement Fund based approximately on the IBM Stock Fund shares he or she acquired (on a net basis) during the Class Period, as compared to other Participants in the Plan; and (2) the distribution shall take place from the Qualified Settlement Fund so as to realize any tax advantage of investment in the Plan. Any material changes will be presented to the Court for approval pursuant to Section IV.B below, and any unresolvable objections to the Settlement Administrator’s calculations shall also be presented to the Court pursuant to Section IV.B below.
QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the Plan of Allocation to the extent necessary to ensure that it is fully and fairly implemented. EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the Plan of Allocation to the extent necessary to ensure that it is fully and fairly implemented. EXHIBIT C IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA XXXXX XXXXXXX, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-05738-MAK ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, PRELIMINARILY CERTIFYING A CLASS FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES, APPROVING FORM AND MANNER OF SETTLEMENT NOTICE, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION,
QUALIFICATIONS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the Plan of Allocation to the extent necessary to ensure that it is fully and fairly implemented. EXHIBIT C
