Reviewing Official. The Reviewing Official is responsible for ensuring that the assessment is a fair and accurate assessment of the Contractor's performance for the specific contract/order and performance period. The Reviewing Official must acknowledge consideration of any significant discrepancies between the Assessing Official’s assessment and the Contractor's remarks.
Reviewing Official. The Reviewing Official is the final authority on disagreements between the contractor and Government for past performance evaluations. The Reviewing Official is one level above the Contracting Officer. The Reviewing Official must review and sign the assessment when the contractor indicates non-concurrence with the CPAR or when the contractor is non-responsive.
Reviewing Official. A reviewing official shall review and make determinations of eligibility using the criteria outlined in this policy to determine which individual children are eligible for free or reduced price meals or free milk. The official should sign, date, and indicate eligibility determination on each application.
Reviewing Official. The REVIEWING OFFICIAL shall within sixty (60) days of the receipt of the dispute, notify the parties of the decision. This decision shall be final and conclusive unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such copy, either party submits to the REVIEWING OFFICIAL, a written appeal addressed to the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Acquisition), Deputy Assistant Secretary (Science, Technology, and Engineering).
Reviewing Official. The individual who must review the evaluation and ensure that appropriate performance planning and evaluation procedures were followed by the employee’s immediate supervisor. A reviewing official should help to resolve disagreements between the supervisor and employee on the plan or evaluation and ensure that:
(i) the plan and evaluation are consistent with this procedure; and
(ii) the overall rating is consistent with the individual elements of the plan.
Reviewing Official. The determination that a NERC employee, consultant or contractor has a need for access to SGI (established “need to know” and is “trustworthy and reliable”) must initially be made by an individual already authorized access to SGI. Accordingly, the NRC and NERC agree to implement the following procedures for granting NERC employees, consultants and contractors access to SGI for the purpose of carrying out this MOU. XXXX shall submit the name and fingerprints of at least one individual to the NRC who NERC has determined to be trustworthy and reliable and has a need to know SGI. NERC’s trustworthiness and reliability determination shall be based, at a minimum, on all elements of a background check except for each individual’s criminal history record. The NRC will conduct a criminal history record check based on each individual’s fingerprints. Based upon the outcome of the criminal history record check, the NRC shall determine if the individual (or individuals if more than one name is submitted and approved) may have access to SGI and can serve as a reviewing official under this MOU. Upon approval by the NRC, this individual (or individuals if more than one name is submitted and approved) may serve as a reviewing official authorized to make SGI access authorization determinations for other NERC employees, consultants and contractors. Individuals possessing an active Federal security clearance require no additional fingerprinting or background check for access to SGI, as this clearance meets the fingerprinting requirement and other elements of the background check, as prescribed in 10 C.F.R. § 73.22(b)(1). Such individuals must still meet the need to know requirement for access to SGI. However, when relying upon an existing active Federal security clearance to meet the SGI access requirements (except for the need to know determination), NERC should obtain and maintain a record of official notification stating that the individual possesses such a clearance. Only NRC-approved reviewing officials shall be authorized to make SGI access determinations for other individuals who have been identified by NERC as having a need to know SGI. The reviewing official shall be responsible for determining that these individuals have a “need to know” for access to SGI to carry out their official duties under this MOU and for determining that these individuals are trustworthy and reliable. The reviewing official’s determination of trustworthiness and reliability shall be based up...
Reviewing Official. The Reviewing Official must be a higher level than the Rating Official in all instances. He/she must review and approve all performance work plans and ratings of record for all employees rated unacceptable, successful, excellent and outstanding.
Reviewing Official. The official (usually the second-level supervisor) who reviews and approves a performance summary rating of Distinguished,
Reviewing Official. The Reviewing Official is normally one (1) level above the Rating Official.
