SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODS AND RATIONALE Sample Clauses

SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODS AND RATIONALE. A focused soil and groundwater assessment was conducted on the Xxxxxx‟s Cleaning Center Site to attempt to identify the source of PCE and other solvent contamination previously found in downgradient xxxxx and to attempt to assess the potential for exposure to hazardous substances in soil, groundwater, or air at the Weldon‟s site. DEQ collected 6 soil samples, 4 groundwater samples, and 3 soil gas samples from the Xxxxxx‟s site to provide a basic assessment of on-site contamination.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODS AND RATIONALE. In order to obtain more information about the occurrence of PCE in shallow groundwater at the site, DEQ collected samples from June 2 through June 4, 2008. DEQ followed our EPA-approved Sampling and Quality Assurance Plan (SQAP) dated August 10, 2004 during this investigation. DEQ drilled 13 soil borings (SB-1 through SB-12 and SB- 14), using a push probe to evaluate the nature and extent of solvent contamination at the site. Each soil boring was logged by a registered geologist. The soil boring logs document the boring identification, date, location, geologist, total depth, and soil description. Once the desired borehole depth was reached, a non-dedicated temporary well point was installed, and a groundwater sample was collected after purging about 1 liter of water. Groundwater was purged and sampled using a mechanical bladder pump. Soil samples were also collected during the drilling of selected boreholes. Groundwater was also collected from seven residential domestic or irrigation xxxxx in the area of the PCE plume Groundwater samples were collected from borings SB1, SB2, and SB3 at Xxxxxxxx’x Property at the locations shown on Figure 2. The borings were completed to evaluate possible releases from the former dry cleaner. SB1 was collected in the Northwest part of the parking lot near the NW corner of the building, SB2 was collected in the Southwest part of the parking lot, and SB3 was collected in the Eastern part of the parking lot southeast of the building. Soil samples from the borings were screened with a PID during drilling and several soil samples were collected for laboratory chemical analysis to help evaluate if this site is a likely PCE source. Shallow groundwater and soil samples were collected soil borings SB4 through SB12 at the locations shown on Figure 2. The borings were completed in the neighborhood between River Road and Rivercrest Avenue to determine the extent of the impacts to shallow groundwater. This work included:
SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODS AND RATIONALE. On February 7, 2001, DEQ excavated seven test pits. Sample locations were originally proposed to be collected beneath the landfill in the native soil. Once the matrix of the landfill material was determined to be primarily soil, DEQ altered the sampling program to collect soil samples from the landfill fill material as well as from beneath the landfill. Four soil samples collected from test pits TP-1, TP2, TP-4, and TP-6 were collected from the fill material. Two on-site soil samples from test pits TP-3 and TP-5 and the background sample collected from test pit TP-7 was collected from the native soil. The sample locations were selected to delineate the vertical and horizontal extent of the landfill. The samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), metals, pesticides, and PCBs. DEQ followed the EPA-approved Sampling and Quality Assurance Plan (SQAP) dated January 26, 2001 during the site investigation. A backhoe was used to excavate test pits and to collect soil samples. A summary of sampling methods is included in Appendix B. Each test pit was logged by a registered geologist. Test pit logs are presented in Appendix C. The test pit logs document the test pit identification, date, location, geologist, total depth, and soil description. A sample key is provided as Table 1. The sample key documents all samples collected at the site. The sample key provides a cross reference between the sample location, sample depth, the EPA regional sample number, as well as the matrix, and date collected. Test pit locations are presented in Figure 4. A photograph log of sampling activities is presented in Appendix D.
SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODS AND RATIONALE. In order to obtain more information about the occurrence of TCE in shallow groundwater at the Site, DEQ conducted a Preliminary Assessment from April 14 - 18, 2003. DEQ followed the EPA-approved Sampling and Quality Assurance Plan (SQAP) dated February 14, 2003 during the Site investigation. DEQ drilled 11 soil borings, using a push probe to evaluate the nature and extent of solvent contamination at the Site. Soil samples were collected in polyvinyl acetate liners. Each soil boring was logged by a registered geologist. The soil boring logs document the boring identification, date, location, geologist, total depth, and soil description. Once the desired borehole depth was reached, a non-dedicated temporary well point was installed, and a groundwater sample was collected. Using EPA funds under the cooperative agreement, DEQ collected 11 groundwater samples from the Linn Gravels (deeper water bearing zone) and two soil samples from the Willamette Silts (shallow water bearing zone). Using state funds, DEQ collected two groundwater samples from the Willamette Silts, six soil samples from the Willamette Silts, and eight groundwater samples from residential xxxxx (deeper water bearing zone). The rationale for each sample location, shown in Figure 2, is listed below: Boring SB1in the right-of-way on Xxxxx Avenue was located the closest to documented releases of petroleum products and solvents from City Industrial Center, former Chevron Bulk Plant, and Evanite Products. Boring SB2 in the right-of-way on Xxxxx Avenue was located north of the Xxxxxx County vehicle maintenance shop. Boring SB3 in the right-of-way on Xxxxx Avenue was located north of the Xxxxxx County Shops. Borings SB4 through SB6 in the right-of-way on Xxxxx Street were located east of the residential xxxxx with the highest TCE concentrations. Boring SB7 in the right-of-way on Xxxxxxx Avenue was located southwest of the Xxxxxx County Shops’ hazardous waste storage area and WPRR railroad. Boring SB8 in the right-of-way on Xxxxxxx Avenue was located south of the Xxxxxx County Shops along the drainage ditch where wash-rack water was discharged from the Xxxxxx County Shops and near the former Xxxxx Mining Site. Boring SB9 in Avery Park was located west of the residential well (1440 Xxxxx) with the highest TCE concentration. Boring SB10 on Xxxxxx County’s property was located east of the Xxxxxx County Shops’ hazardous waste storage facility. Boring SB11 on Xxxxxx County’s property was located near the ref...

Related to SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODS AND RATIONALE

  • Sample Collection The collection and testing of the samples shall be performed only by a laboratory and by a physician or health care professional qualified and authorized to administer and determine the meaning of any test results. The laboratory performing the test shall be one that is certified by the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA). The laboratory chosen must be agreed to between the Union and the Employer. The laboratory used shall also be one whose procedures are periodically tested by the NIDA where they analyze unknown samples sent to an independent party. The results of employee’s tests shall be made available to the Medical Review Officer. Collection of urine samples shall be conducted in a manner, which provides the highest degree of security for the sample and freedom from adulteration. Recognized strict chain of custody procedures must be followed for all samples as set by NIDA. The Union and the Employer agree that security of the biological urine samples is absolutely necessary therefore the Employer agrees that if the security of the sample is compromised in anyway, any positive test shall be invalid and may not be used for any purpose. Urine samples will be submitted as per NIDA Standards. Employees have the right for Union or legal counsel representative to be present during the submission of the sample. A split sample shall be reserved in all cases for an independent analysis in the event of a positive test result. All samples must be stored in a scientific acceptable preserved manner as established by NIDA. All positive confirmed samples and related paperwork must be retained by the laboratory for at least six (6) months or for the duration of any grievance, disciplinary action or legal proceedings whichever is longer. At the conclusion of this period, the paperwork and specimen shall be destroyed. Tests shall be conducted in a manner to ensure that an employee’s legal drug use and diet does not affect the test results.

  • Originating Switched Access Detail Usage Data A category 1101XX record as defined in the EMI Telcordia Practice BR-010-200- 010.

  • Data Collection Some downloaded software included in the Materials may generate and collect information about the software and usage and transmit it to Intel to help improve Intel’s products and services. This collected information may include product name, product version, time of event collection, license type, support type, installation status, hardware and software performance, and use. 9.

  • Selection Under a Fixed Budget Services for assignments which the Association agrees meet the requirements of paragraph 3.5 of the Consultant Guidelines may be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of a Fixed Budget in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.1 and 3.5 of the Consultant Guidelines.

  • CMI/RAI MDS Report Recognizing the mutual objective of quality resident care, the Employer agrees to meet through the Union Management Committee with the Union as soon as practicable after the receipt of the annual CMI/RAI MDS report. The Employer agrees to provide the Union with staffing levels, and staffing mix information; the impact of related payroll costs on staffing levels and a written notice of the CMI/RAI MDS report for the facility. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the impact of the CMI/RAI MDS report on the staffing levels in the Home, quality resident care, and provide the Union with an opportunity to make representation in that regard. The parties shall meet as necessary to discuss other changes or workload issues. The parties may invite additional participants to attend the meeting to support constructive review and discussion.

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.8.1 NOW will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. NOW must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non-designed unbundled loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. At the time of the trouble report, NOW will be required to provide the results of the NOW test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided loop.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.