Similar Project Experience Sample Clauses

Similar Project Experience. The Bidder shall provide details of his performance on each of the previous relevant projects. Bidders must provide/attach appointment letter and Completion certification in a form of Practical or Final completion certificate listed under the “Similar Project Experience” returnable schedule below. Failure to complete the table below will result in no points allocated. No “see attached” will be accepted LIST THE FIVE SIMILAR PROJECTS EXPERIENCE COMPLETED BY YOUR FIRM IN THE LAST TEN (10) YEARS BID 15 T1.1 80/20 preferential procurement system to be utilized as per PPPFA 2022. The project is below R50m. Variables Total Points Criteria Description Of Criteria Points Financial Offer / Price: Financial Offer/Price 80 Formula=2 Option 1, A=(1- {p-pm/pm} Formula used to calculate financial offer/price points Pm=The comparative Price offer of the mean/average quantifying Bidder P=The comparative offer of the Bid under consideration The specific goals allocated points in terms of this Bid Number of points allocated (80/20 system) (To be completed by the organ of state) Number of points claimed (80/20 system) (To be completed by the Bider) Women 6 Youth 6 People with Disabilities 4 Black 4 TOTAL POINTS CLAIMED 20
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Similar Project Experience. Provide up to five directly relevant projects for the Contractor and Major Subcontractor (up to ten projects in total, but no less than two for each entity) in the last five years that best demonstrate the experience and qualifications of the Major Subcontractor. Preference may be given for projects implemented using design-build delivery method. For each project include: a) Project name and location. b) Project description. c) Project status (percentage of completion). d) Owner contact information (name, title, current telephone number). e) Discussion of relevance to the Project. f) Services performed by Contractor, Design Professional or Constructor. g) Specific roles of key personnel. h) Discussion of how problems, unanticipated circumstances, and challenges were addressed. i) Project delivery method (design-build, design-bid-build, etc.). j) Original and final project cost. If the final project cost exceeded the original project cost by more than ten percent (10%), provide an explanation why in as much detail as the Offeror deems necessary.
Similar Project Experience. Please provide a minimum of five (5) descriptions of projects completed by your firm within the last two (2) years that are similar in scope to the Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. tenant improvement. The project descriptions should include photographs, a brief narrative describing the work performed, the project cost, the project size in SF, and the names of the GC team members. Please also include client references, including contact information, for each project listed. The project descriptions shall be attached as Exhibit “I.”
Similar Project Experience. Roadway Repair Project; CDBG, FEMA, Town of Xxxxx, CO (2020); Construction Inspector – J-U-B performed the construction management and inspection services for this Local Agency FEMA- HUD funded roadway
Similar Project Experience. Provide examples demonstrating experience for the type of work listed within the last five (5) years. Each Proposer shall provide proof of experience in providing general consulting services for Town and County governments within the State of Florida under the ConsultantsCompetitive Negotiations Act.

Related to Similar Project Experience

  • Work Experience Formula hour equivalents will be given on the basis of the following number of students enrolled at fourth week census: 5-14 students enrolled = 1 (one) formula hour 15-24 students enrolled = 2 (two) formula hours 25-34 students enrolled = 3 (three) formula hours

  • Teaching Experience Recognized Years of Experience: Uncredited Experience:

  • Previous Experience 31.01 New employees will be classified according to previous comparable experience for the purpose of establishing wage rates. The Co-operative shall not be required to recognize previous experience of new employees who have not worked in the same or similar business in the past two (2) years. Recognized credit for previous experience shall be applicable to qualifying employees commencing with the first working day following completion of said employee's probationary period. 31.02 It shall be the responsibility of the employee to supply proof of their previous experience prior to the completion of their probationary period. Otherwise, all claim for credit for previous experience shall be forfeited by the employee. 31.03 In the event of any disagreement as to credit granted for previous experience, such disagreement shall be considered a grievance, and the Grievance Procedure provided in the Agreement shall apply.

  • Related Experience Previous experience related to the duties associated with the position.

  • Project Changes 1.8.1. All changes shall be administered per the UGC. 1.8.2. Upon authorization by the Owner, the Owner or Architect/Engineer will prepare and issue all changes to the Contract affecting cost, scope and/or time as a formal Change Order to the Contract on the standard University of Texas MD Xxxxxxxx Cancer Center Change Order form. The Change Order may include separate change issues, identified as Change Proposals and field orders. 1.8.3. Upon authorization by the Owner, Change Proposals may be issued to the Architect/Engineer for pricing by the Contractor. Contractor shall submit pricing to the Owner within twenty-one (21) days and pricing shall be indicated on the standard Owner "Change in Work Cost Analysis" ("Cost Analysis") form provided in the Pre-Construction Conference Brochure. Contractor may not include a Change Proposal within a Change Order unless the Owner has accepted the Change Proposal. 1.8.3.1. The Contractor shall summarize all costs for each change at each level of subcontractor and supplier by preparing the "Cost Analysis" form, and shall provide each subcontractor's cost summary on separate "Cost Analysis" forms as backup. Additional support documentation from both the Contractor and Contractor’s subcontractors is encouraged, but such will not replace use of the standard form. 1.8.3.2. When the Contractor believes it is entitled to a time extension, Contractor shall so state as part of Contractor’s response to the Change Proposal, including a justifica- tion for a time extension. Owner may grant time extensions only if a Change Proposal affects the activities on the Longest Path of an Owner approved Work Progress Schedule; i.e., when the Work impacts the "Contract Substantial Completion Date". 1.8.3.3. If the Owner’s Project Manager and Contractor cannot mutually agree upon a fair and reasonable cost and time settlement, the Owner’s Project Manager may: 1) Reject the quotation and void the Change Proposal, 2) Issue instructions to the Contractor to proceed on a time and material basis for a price to be determined later not to exceed a fixed maximum dollar and time, or 3) Issue a Unilateral Change Order. 1.8.3.4. The Owner’s Construction Inspector and/or Owner’s Project Manager may issue field orders directly to the Contractor for minor changes to the Contract, which can be negotiated in the field. Pricing backup is at the discretion of the Owner’s Construction Inspector, but pricing backup is required for any field order, the pricing backup is to be outlined on the "Cost Analysis" form. When the Owner and Contractor have signed the field order, the Work is authorized and the field order may be included in the next Change Order. 1.8.4. Request for payment for Change Order work may be submitted only after the Change Order has been fully executed.

  • Projects There shall be a thirty (30) km free zone around the projects excluding the Metro Vancouver Area. For local residents, kilometers shall be paid from the boundary of the free zone around the project. Workers employed by any contractor within an identified free zone who resides outside of that same free zone will be paid according to the Kilometer Chart from the project to their residence less thirty

  • Years Experience Company years experience in this category? This is an evaluation criterion worth a maximum of 10 points. See RFP for more information. (If applicable, vendor should download the Reseller/Dealers spreadsheet from the Attachments section, fill out the f orm and submit the document in the ”Response Attachments” RESELLERS section. EXAMPLE: BIGmart is a reseller of ACME brand televisions. If ACME were a TIPS awarded vendor, then ACME woul d list BIGmart as a reseller.

  • Investment Experience Holder understands that the purchase of this Warrant and its underlying securities involves substantial risk. Holder has experience as an investor in securities of companies in the development stage and acknowledges that Holder can bear the economic risk of such Holder’s investment in this Warrant and its underlying securities and has such knowledge and experience in financial or business matters that Holder is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of its investment in this Warrant and its underlying securities and/or has a preexisting personal or business relationship with the Company and certain of its officers, directors or controlling persons of a nature and duration that enables Holder to be aware of the character, business acumen and financial circumstances of such persons.

  • Development of the Property Except as modified by this Agreement, the Development and the Property will be developed in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations, including but not limited to the City’s ordinances and the zoning regulations applicable to the Property, and such amendments to City ordinances and regulations that that may be applied to the Development and the Property under Chapter 245, Texas Local Government Code, and good engineering practices (the “Applicable Regulations”). If there is a conflict between the Applicable Regulations and the Development Standards, the Development Standards shall control.

  • Year 2000 Problem The Company and its Subsidiaries have reviewed the areas within their business and operations which could be adversely affected by, and have developed or are developing a program to address on a timely basis, the "Year 2000 Problem" (that is, the risk that computer applications used by the Company and its Subsidiaries may be unable to recognize and perform properly date-sensitive functions involving certain dates prior to and any date after December 31, 1999). Based on such review and program, the Company reasonably believes that the "Year 2000 Problem" will not have a Material Adverse Effect.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!