Staff Involvement in District Interventions to Improve Performance Sample Clauses

Staff Involvement in District Interventions to Improve Performance. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 significantly changes the role of the federal government in education. Similarly, the Maryland Bridge to Excellence in Education Act increases the role of the state government. Both pieces of legislation are based on the principle of accountability, requiring school districts and individual schools to meet specific standards for school achievement. Those schools that are not able to meet these standards may be subject to intervention imposed by either Xxxxxxxxxx County Public Schools or by the Maryland State Department of Education. When MCPS intervenes in a school to provide intensive assistance to improve performance, school staff will participate in the intervention and improvement process. 1. The deputy superintendent will notify MCEA when an intensive intervention is needed. 2. MCEA will collaborate with MCPS in developing intervention plans for individual schools to ensure staff ownership of the improvement process 3. MCPS will provide a reasonable opportunity for all unit members to participate in developing an improvement plan that addresses the problems identified by the profile data. 4. The principal, school leadership team, staff development teacher, and the Office of School Support and Improvement (OSSI) will work to ensure that the school’s plan for professional development is integrated with and driven by the improvement plan and is communicated to all staff. 5. The OSSI will facilitate ongoing communication with MCEA and with the entire staff throughout the process of developing a new direction/improvement plan for the school.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Staff Involvement in District Interventions to Improve Performance. When MCPS intervenes in a school to provide intensive assistance to improve performance, school staff will participate in the intervention and improvement process. 1. The deputy superintendent will notify MCEA when an intensive intervention is needed. 2. MCEA will collaborate with MCPS in developing intervention plans for individual schools to ensure staff ownership of the improvement process 3. MCPS will provide a reasonable opportunity for all unit members to participate in developing an improvement plan that addresses the problems identified by the profile data. 4. The principal, school leadership team, staff development teacher, and the Office of School Support and Improvement (OSSI) will work to ensure that the school’s plan for professional development is integrated with and driven by the improvement plan and is communicated to all staff. 5. The OSSI will facilitate ongoing communication with MCEA and with the entire staff throughout the process of developing a new direction/improvement plan for the school. 6. Schools identified for Comprehensive or Targeted Support and Improvement shall have unit members on required school-based teams who are elected by the unit members at the school.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
Staff Involvement in District Interventions to Improve Performance. When MCPS intervenes in a school to provide intensive assistance to improve performance, school staff will participate in the intervention and improvement process. The deputy superintendent will notify MCEA when an intensive intervention is needed. MCEA will collaborate with MCPS in developing intervention plans for individual schools to ensure staff ownership of the improvement process
Sample 1

Related to Staff Involvement in District Interventions to Improve Performance

  • Elements Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Exemplary IV-A-1. Reflective Practice Demonstrates limited reflection on practice and/or use of insights gained to improve practice. May reflect on the effectiveness of lessons/ units and interactions with students but not with colleagues and/or rarely uses insights to improve practice. Regularly reflects on the effectiveness of lessons, units, and interactions with students, both individually and with colleagues, and uses insights gained to improve practice and student learning. Regularly reflects on the effectiveness of lessons, units, and interactions with students, both individually and with colleagues; and uses and shares with colleagues, insights gained to improve practice and student learning. Is able to model this element.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK

  • County’s Project Manager Note: The written approval of substituted A-E Key Personnel is for departmental use only and shall not be used for auditing purposes outside OC Public Works or other County department.

  • Taxes and Fees Imposed Directly On Either Providing Party or Purchasing Party 13.2.1 Taxes and fees imposed on the providing Party, which are not permitted or required to be passed on by the providing Party to its customer, shall be borne and paid by the providing Party. 13.2.2 Taxes and fees imposed on the purchasing Party, which are not required to be collected and/or remitted by the providing Party, shall be borne and paid by the purchasing Party.

  • Project Monitoring The Developer shall provide regular status reports to the NYISO in accordance with the monitoring requirements set forth in the Development Schedule, the Public Policy Transmission Planning Process Manual and Attachment Y of the OATT.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the Funder has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • Trustee’s Good Faith Action, Expert Advice, No Bond or Surety The exercise by the Trustees of their powers hereunder shall be binding upon everyone interested in or dealing with the Trust. A Trustee shall be liable to the Trust and to any Shareholder solely for his or her own willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of the office of Trustee, and shall not be liable for errors of judgment or mistakes of fact or law. The Trustees may take advice of counsel or other experts with respect to the meaning and operation of this Declaration of Trust, and shall be under no liability for any act or omission in accordance with such advice nor for failing to follow such advice. The Trustees shall not be required to give any bond as such, nor any surety if a bond is required.

  • Performance of the Work The Contractor shall perform all of the Work required for the complete and prompt execution of everything described or shown in, or reasonably implied from the Contract Documents for the above referenced Project.

  • Professional Development; Adverse Consequences of School Exclusion; Student Behavior The Board President or Superintendent, or their designees, will make reasonable efforts to provide ongoing professional development to Board members about the adverse consequences of school exclusion and justice-system involvement, effective classroom management strategies, culturally responsive discipline, appropriate and available supportive services for the promotion of student attendance and engagement, and developmentally appropriate disciplinary methods that promote positive and healthy school climates, i.e., Senate Bill 100 training topics. The Board will conduct periodic self-evaluations with the goal of continuous improvement. New Board Member Orientation The orientation process for newly elected or appointed Board members includes:

  • Joint Remediation Committee If the Sellers (acting reasonably) determine that the Purchasers have committed a Major Default, then, at the election of the Sellers, within three (3) Business Days of the Sellers providing the Purchasers written notice of such determination, the Sellers and the Purchasers shall establish a joint remediation committee of designated executives from the Sellers and the Purchasers (“Joint Remediation Committee”) consisting of three (3) members of each of the Sellers and the Purchasers. The Joint Remediation Committee shall be responsible for overseeing the development of a mutually agreeable plan in accordance with subsection 3 below to either (i) remediate any breaches giving rise to the Major Default to the extent such breaches can be remediated and/or (ii) prevent similar breaches from recurring in the future (clauses (i) and (ii), a “Corrective Action Plan”). Each member of the Joint Remediation Committee shall have sufficient authority on the part of his or her respective party to make decisions relating to matters reviewed by the Joint Remediation Committee, and shall be approved by the other party (such approval not to be unreasonably delayed, conditioned or withheld). The Joint Remediation Committee shall have access to Purchaser Personnel that are primarily responsible for the area of the business relationship (such as information technology, data security or regulatory) where the breaches giving rise to the Major Default arise (such Purchaser Personnel, collectively, the “Subject Matter Experts”). The Sellers and the Purchasers shall cause their respective members on the Joint Remediation Committee to, and the Purchasers shall cause the Subject Matter Experts to, act in good faith in connection with the development of the Corrective Action Plan.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!