Common use of Student Growth Criterion Score Clause in Contracts

Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG

Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SGSG 6.2 and SG 8. 1. For a comprehensive evaluation, evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average or high based on the scoring bands below:

Student Growth Criterion Score. 1. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth Student Growth (SG) components. These components are embedded in criteria 3, 6, and 8 as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SGSG 6.2 and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components, to determine the student growth criterion:

Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SGSG 6.2, and SG 8.1. For a Comprehensive evaluation, evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average, or high based on the scores below. Overall ratings are determined by preponderance of evidence and most recent evidence, as recommended by the Xxxxxxxxx protocol. 5-12 Low 13-17 Average 18-20 High

Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average or high based on the scores below: 1. 5-12 – Low 2. 13-17 – Average 3. 18-20 – High

Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SGSG 6.2 and SG 8. 1. For a Comprehensive Evaluation, evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average or high based on the scoring bands below:

Student Growth Criterion Score. 1. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SGSG 6.2, and SG 8.1. (Appendix E UW CEL 5 D+ Rubric) Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average or high based on the scores below:

Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SGSG 6.2, and SG 8. 1. For a Comprehensive evaluation, evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average, or high based on the scores below. Overall ratings are determined by preponderance of evidence and most recent evidence, as recommended by the Xxxxxxxxx protocol. 5-12 Low 13-17 Average 18-20 High

Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SGSG 6.2 and SG 8. 1. For a comprehensive evaluation, evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average or high based on the scores below. Overall ratings are determined by preponderance of evidence and most recent evidence, as recommended by the Xxxxxxxxx protocol. 1. 5-12 Low 2. 13-17 Average 3. 18-20 High

Student Growth Criterion Score. 3 Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated by state law 4 as student growth (SG) components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 5 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SGSG 6.2, and SG 8.1. As defined by state law each classroom teacher 6 shall have one student growth goal for criteria components 3.1 and 3.2 and one student 7 growth goal for criteria components 6.1 and 6.2. SG 6.1 and SG 8.1 may be the same goal.

Student Growth Criterion Score. A. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SGSG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average or high based on the scores below:

Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SGSG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators total the raw score on these components and the employee is given a rating of low, average or high based on the scores below: Low 5-12 Average 13-17 High 18-20

Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average or high based on the scores below:

Student Growth Criterion Score. 1. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SGSG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average or high based on the scores below:

Student Growth Criterion Score. a. Embedded in the instructional framework are five (5) components designated as student growth components. These components are embedded in criteria as SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SGSG 6.2, and SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average or high based on the scores below: