Common use of Student Growth Criterion Score Clause in Contracts

Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five components designated as student growth 15 components. These components are SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the 16 raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average, or high based 17 on the following rubric: 18 19 1. 5-12 Low 20 21 2. 13-17 Average 22 23 3. 18-20 High 24 25 B. Student Growth data will be taken from multiple sources, and must be appropriate and relevant 26 to the teacher’s assignment. It should include teacher initiated formal and informal assessments 27 of student progress. These assessments can be formative and/or summative in nature and should 28 be an organic “natural harvest” gathered from the essential work that effective teachers are 29 already doing. 30

Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five components designated as student growth 15 14 components. These components are SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the 16 15 raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average, or high based 17 16 on the following rubric: 18 19 1. 5-12 Low 19 20 21 2. 13-17 Average 21 22 23 3. 18-20 High 24 25 B. Student Growth data will be taken from multiple sources, and must be appropriate and relevant 26 25 to the teacher’s assignment. It should include teacher initiated formal and informal assessments 27 26 of student progress. These assessments can be formative and/or summative in nature and should 28 27 be an organic “natural harvest” gathered from the essential work that effective teachers are 29 28 already doing. 30.

Student Growth Criterion Score. 29 A. Embedded in the instructional framework are five components designated as student growth 15 30 components. These components are SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the 16 31 raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average, or high based 17 32 on the following rubric: 18 19 33 34 1. 5-12 Low 20 21 1 2 2. 13-17 Average 22 23 4 3. 18-20 High 24 25 6 B. Student Growth data will be taken from multiple sources, and must be appropriate and relevant 26 7 to the teacher’s assignment. It should include teacher initiated formal and informal assessments 27 8 of student progress. These assessments can be formative and/or summative in nature and should 28 9 be an organic “natural harvest” gathered from the essential work that effective teachers are 29 already doing. 30are

Student Growth Criterion Score. Embedded in the instructional framework are five components designated as student growth 15 components. These components are SG 3.1, SG 3.2, SG 6.1, SG 6.2, SG 8.1. Evaluators add up the 16 raw score on these components and the employee is given a score of low, average, or high based 17 on the following rubric: 18 19 1. 5-12 Low 20 21 2. 13-17 Average 22 23 3. 18-20 High 24 25 B. Student Growth data will be taken from multiple sources, and must be appropriate and relevant 26 to the teacher’s assignment. It should include teacher initiated formal and informal assessments 27 of student progress. These assessments can be formative and/or summative in nature and should 28 be an organic “natural harvest” gathered from the essential work that effective teachers are 29 already doing. 30.