Table 0 Sample Clauses

Table 0. 4: Development needs of universities (rang, mean) Increase the practical orientation of teaching Enhance traineeships and internships Improvements in their financial systems Focus on short-term skill development Focus on long-term skill development Support an international orientation Focus on research and development Enabling the valorisation of applied research Strategic cooperation with business Non/minor extent of 1. 3. 8. 9. 4. 5. 7. 6. 2. UBC 6,12 5,71 4,72 4,62 5,69 5,45 4,91 4,94 5,95 Medium extent of 2. 3. 8. 9. 5. 4. 7. 6. 1. UBC 6,10 5,73 4,96 4,65 5,35 5,44 5,24 5,28 6,25 High extent of 2. 3. 8. 9. 6. 4. 7. 5. 1. UBC 6,33 5,96 5,42 4,64 5,62 5,83 5,51 5,81 6,56 Question B4: In your view, to what extent should higher education institutions change in the future? Mean of responses of a 7-level scale where 1=”Not at all” and 7=”To a very high extent”. When comparing the reported results among EMCOSU countries there are just minor differences regarding the developmental needs that should be implemented in the future in order to enhance university-business cooperation. Bulgarian, Slovenian and Spanish representatives reported that there should be tendencies towards the development of strategic cooperation with business, and Hungarian and Polish representatives reported that higher education institutions should increase practical orientation of teaching. Comparing to other countries there is a high tendency of Slovenian representative to support an international orientation. Lower emphasis for the future developments, however still with relatively high mean (4,61), was reported for focus on short-term skill development and improvements of the higher education financial systems (mean in total 4,99).
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Table 0. 2 1995 and proposed year 2030 surface water diversion. Note: The diversions described below, combined with the dry year actions, will meet each supplier’s customer needs
Sample 1
Table 0. Xxxxxx Segment Location *Location 28 was identified as an environmentally sensitive area, therefore, Location 28 has been eliminated and is no longer part of the project. **Location 37 excludes parcels 0000-000-000, 0000-000-000 and 0000-000-000 that are already improved. PROJECT MAP GENERAL SCOPE OF SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED TABLE 2 Item# Parcel # Project Xxxxxxxx # Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx xx Xxxxxx TABLE 2 (Continued) Item# Parcel # Project Xxxxxxxx # Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx xx Xxxxxx DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK
Sample 1
Table 0. 4 Table 1. Water Forum cost-sharing for lower American River habitat projects. PROJECT/STUDY AGENCY ANNUAL COST Years 2-4 Ongoing Wetland/Slough Complex SAFCA CALFED4 Water Forum Unknown Unknown $25,000 To be determined Shaded Riverine Aquatic Habitat SAFCA CALFED Water Forum Unknown Unknown $25,000 To be determined Tailrace Habitat Utilization Study CALFED Water Forum $15,000 $15,000 Study Complete Thermal Refugia Utilization Study CALFED Water Forum $25,000 $25,000 Study Complete Off-site Mitigation (if required) Water Forum Unknown Unknown Monitoring and Evaluation SAFCA Water Forum $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 4 CALFED – a state and federal program for… CVPIA $100,000 $100,000 Plan Development, Updating and Technical Assistance SAFCA CALFED CVPIA $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 Table 0.5 Table 2. Additional lower American River habitat projects. These are additional projects and studies that would be carried out by other organizations. High New Flow Standards Project City of Sacramento City of Sacramento High Flow Fluctuation Criteria Project CVPIA Reclamation USBR High Dry Year Flow Augmentation Project CVPIA PCWA Reclamation USBR /USFWS High Folsom Temperature Control Device (TCD) Project Reclamation USBR Reclamation USBR High Folsom Reservoir Cold Water Pool Management Project SCWA Folsom SJWD Reclamation USBR Reclamation USBR High In Stream Cover (Xxxxx Xxxxxx) Project Corps SAFCA Corps SAFCA High Flood Control Channel Improvement Project SAFCA Corps SAFCA High Spawning Habitat Management/ Maintenance Study, Project CVPIA CALFED CDFW CDFG USFWS High Hatchery Temperature Control Project Reclamation USBR Reclamation USBR High Hatchery Management Practices Project Reclamation USBR Reclamation USBR Moderate Fire Management Project Sacramento County Sacramento County Low Increase Artificial Production of Salmonids Project Reclamation USBR CDFW CDFG Low Angling Regulations Project CDFW CDFG CDFW CDFG
Sample 1
Table 0 a – Content from New Partners
Sample 1
Table 0. 0.0.0: Differences in clinical, biochemical and haematological parameters on admission to intensive care between medical survivors and those who died or underwent transplantation. Medical survivors N=44 Death (without transplant) N=6 Transplanted N=4 Death or Transplanted N=10 AST (IU/L) 1551 (16 – 7755) 627 (48 – 3040) 3345 (3000 – 3739)* 1714 (48 – 3739) Lactate (mg/dl) 2.5 (0.8 – 6.6) 7.8 (3.5 – 18.0)* 7.3 (2.6 – 12.0)* 7.6 (2.6 – 18)* Platelet count 81 (19 – 255) 73 (25 - 153) 34 (21 – 54)* 57 (21 – 153) (cells/µL) Creatinine (mg/dl) 1.99 (0.58 – 4.47) 1.94 (0.83 – 3.73) 2.04 (1.61 – 2.5) 1.98 (0.83 – 3.73) Bilirubin (mg/dl) 5.26 (0.81 – 22.69) 5.61 (0.52 – 12.16) 4.85 (3.85 – 5.49) 4.23 (0.5 – 12.2) INR 1.5 (0.8 – 3.9) 2.2 (1.1 – 4.3) 2.0 (1.24 – 2.7) 2.1 (1.1 – 4.3) Encephalopathy 43 83 100* 90* (%) *p<0.05 when compared to medical survivors
Sample 1
Table 0. 0.0.0: Aetiology of liver disease and effect of era on clinical parameters and intensive care management at KCH AFLP (1997-2008) N=18 HELLP (1997-2008) N=26 AFLP (1986-96) N=32 HELLP (1986-96) N=7 Median age at presentation 31 (21-38) 34 (23-40) 30 (17-40) 31 (23-41) Week of gestation 36 (33-38) 35 (27-40) 36 (28-40) 34 (27-38) Pre-eclampsia (%) 11%* 100%* 50%* 100%* Number 10 (56%) 9 (35%) 20 (63%)* 1 (14%)* encephalopathic/ventilated Platelet count (150-450 cells/µL) 100 (33-180)* 48 (15-99)* 123 (26-262)* 39 (19-89)* Creatinine (45-120 mg/dL) 210 (100–396) 160 (52–309) 245 (99-758) 102 (63-526) CVVH 8 (47%) 13 (46%) - - AST (10-50 IU/L) 78 (16-3003)* 2270 (58-7755)* 99 (25-911) 342 (60-328) Bilirubin (3-20 µmol/L) 123 (37-194)* 48 (14-388)* 142 (63-646)* 34 (19-124)* Lactate (<2 mg/dl) 2 (1-6.5) 1.9 (0.7-7.3) - - INR (0.9-1.2) 1.8 (1.09–4.3)* 1.2 (0.84–3)* - -
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Table 0

  • Table 3 Appendix Information

  • Table 2 Determinations Determination Concerning Determiner 2.8.2.7 Complaints and Grievances Under the Decision Making Model

  • Table 4 Ending this Addendum when the Approved Addendum Changes

  • Table 2 (definition of “Casino Gross Revenue”) 15(e) 2 (definition of “Commissioning”) 19 2 (definition of “Committee’s Nominated Representative) 20(1) 6(1)(c) 20(2) 7(8)(a) 21(d) 11(1) 21(e) 11(2) 22(2) 11(3) 23(b) 14(d) 33(2) 15(a)(B) 35(1) 15(b)(i) 35(2) 15(c) 36(b) 15(d) 36(c)

  • CROSS-REFERENCE TABLE TIA Section Indenture Section

  • Level IV a. If the grievant is not satisfied with the disposition of his/her grievance at Level III, he/she may file the grievance within five (5) days of the Level III response for transmittal to the Board. b. The Board will hear the grievance at its next regularly scheduled meeting or a special meeting which has been called for that purpose. The Board shall transmit its written decision to the grievant within five (5) days of the meeting. The decision of the Board shall be final. Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to deny a grievant any appeal rights available under the law.

  • Nxxxx X Xxxxxxx is hereby designated as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Jxxx Xxxxxxxxx is designated the General Counsel and Secretary of the Company, each to serve in such capacity until his earlier death, resignation or removal from office.

  • Tables a. Table 1A is deleted in its entirety, replaced by a revised Table 1A provided hereto as Enclosure 2 and is incorporated into the Purchase Agreement by this reference. This new Table 1A reflects [*]. b. Table 1B is deleted in its entirety, replaced by a revised Table 1B provided hereto as Enclosure 3 and is incorporated into the Purchase Agreement by this reference. This new Table 1B reflects [*].

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Level I If the grievance is not resolved through informal discussions, the School District designee shall give a written decision on the grievance to the parties involved within ten (10) days after receipt of the written grievance.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!