Term Review Sample Clauses

Term Review. 2. The Recipient shall carry out, jointly with the Association, not later than three (3) years after the Effective Date, or such other period as may be agreed with the Association, a mid-term review of the Project (“Mid-Term Review”) to assess the status of Project implementation, as measured against the indicators acceptable to the Association, and compliance with the legal covenants included or referred to in this Agreement. Such review shall include an assessment of the following: (a) overall progress in implementation; (b) results of monitoring and evaluation activities; (c) progress on procurement and disbursement; (d) progress on implementation of ESS measures; (e) implementation arrangements and Project staffing; and (f) the need to make any adjustments to the Project to improve performance. To this end, the Recipient shall:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Term Review. 2. The Recipient shall carry out jointly with the Association and the Project Implementing Entities, not later than three (3) years after the Effective Date, or such other period as may be agreed with the Association, a mid-term review of the Project (the “Mid-Term Review”) to assess the status of Project implementation, as measured against the indicators acceptable to the Association, and compliance with the legal covenants included or referred to in this Agreement and the Project Agreements. Such review shall include an assessment of the following: (i) overall progress in implementation; (ii) results of monitoring and evaluation activities;
Term Review. The Borrower shall cause the PA to:
Term Review. 24. The Borrower and ADB shall undertake a midterm review in the third year of the Project implementation period to assess the achievement of the Project objectives and implementation milestones. The assessment shall include (i) progress in policy measures,
Term Review. A. This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by the governing bodies of the Parties and shall continue in full force and effect for ten (10) years, unless extended by mutual written agreement of the Parties or unless sooner terminated or superseded, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. In no case shall this Agreement be extended by more than ten
Term Review. The Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2020 (the “Effective Date”) and shall continue for three (3) years unless terminated sooner by either party in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. This Agreement may be renewed for further three (3) year terms upon the partiesmutual written agreement following Riverview and the Commission’s review of the existing terms of the Agreement. Riverview to provide the Commission with prior written notice of its intention to renew the Agreement at least one (1) Contract Year prior to the expiration of the initial term or any renewal term. Each twelve month period commencing on January 1st and ending on December 31st while the Agreement is in effect shall be referred to herein as a “Contract Year”.
Term Review. 34. The Borrower acknowledges that in two years following the Effective Date, a comprehensive midterm review shall be undertaken jointly by ADB and NHA to review all aspects of the Project implementation, including procurement financing and scheduling matters. Schedule 6 All reviews, including the mid-term review, shall be conducted as described in Schedule 1 to FFA.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Term Review. 2. (a) The report which the Recipient and Project Implementing Entity shall furnish to the Association, on or about December 31, 2009, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.08 of the General Conditions (for the purposes of this Section “the Mid-Term Review Report”), shall: (i) integrate the results of the monitoring and evaluation activities performed on the progress achieved since commencement of Project implementation in carrying out of the Project; and (ii) set forth the measures recommended to ensure satisfactory Project implementation and achievement of the Project objectives for the remainder of Project implementation; and

Related to Term Review

  • Midterm Review The Recipient shall:

  • Mid-Term Review The Borrower shall:

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • Term; Renewal Subject to Section 4.02 hereof, this Agreement has a one-year term and shall continue in force until the first anniversary of the date hereof. Thereafter, this Agreement may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year terms upon mutual consent of the parties. It is the Board’s duty to evaluate the performance of the Advisor annually before renewing the Agreement, and each such renewal shall be for a term of no more than one year.

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Validation Review In the event OIG has reason to believe that: (a) Good Shepherd’s Claims Review fails to conform to the requirements of this CIA; or (b) the IRO’s findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate, OIG may, at its sole discretion, conduct its own review to determine whether the Claims Review complied with the requirements of the CIA and/or the findings or Claims Review results are inaccurate (Validation Review). Good Shepherd shall pay for the reasonable cost of any such review performed by OIG or any of its designated agents. Any Validation Review of Reports submitted as part of Good Shepherd’s final Annual Report shall be initiated no later than one year after Good Shepherd’s final submission (as described in Section II) is received by OIG. Prior to initiating a Validation Review, OIG shall notify Good Shepherd of its intent to do so and provide a written explanation of why OIG believes such a review is necessary. To resolve any concerns raised by OIG, Good Shepherd may request a meeting with OIG to: (a) discuss the results of any Claims Review submissions or findings; (b) present any additional information to clarify the results of the Claims Review or to correct the inaccuracy of the Claims Review; and/or (c) propose alternatives to the proposed Validation Review. Good Shepherd agrees to provide any additional information as may be requested by OIG under this Section III.D.3 in an expedited manner. OIG will attempt in good faith to resolve any Claims Review issues with Good Shepherd prior to conducting a Validation Review. However, the final determination as to whether or not to proceed with a Validation Review shall be made at the sole discretion of OIG.

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Design Review At appropriate stages of design, documented reviews of the design results shall be planned and conducted. Participants at each Design Review shall include representatives of all functions concerned with the design stage being reviewed, as well as other specialist personnel, as required. Records of such reviews shall be maintained. Any computer software used to perform alternative calculations or verify clearances through the use of scale models or computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) techniques shall be validated before the use of the application, with validation documented in accordance with Section 2.2.15. In addition, at each submittal to IFA for review, Developer shall provide hand calculations that validate any calculations performed by computer software.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.