Term Review Sample Clauses

Term Review. The Recipient shall carry out jointly with the Association and the Project Implementing Entities, not later than three (3) years after the Effective Date, or such other period as may be agreed with the Association, a mid-term review of the Project (the “Mid-Term Review”) to assess the status of Project implementation, as measured against the indicators acceptable to the Association, and compliance with the legal covenants included or referred to in this Agreement and the Project Agreements. Such review shall include an assessment of the following: (i) overall progress in implementation; (ii) results of monitoring and evaluation activities;
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Term Review. The Borrower and ADB shall undertake a midterm review in the third year of the Project implementation period to assess the achievement of the Project objectives and implementation milestones. The assessment shall include (i) progress in policy measures,
Sample 1
Term Review. The Borrower shall cause the PA to: (a) maintain policies and procedures adequate to enable the PA to monitor and evaluate on an on-going basis, in accordance with indicators agreed with the Administrator, the carrying out of the Project and the achievement of the objectives thereof; (b) prepare, under terms of reference satisfactory to the Administrator, and furnish to the Administrator, not later than June 30, 1999, a mid-term report integrating the results of the monitoring and evaluation activities; and (c) review with the Administrator, not later than September 30, 1999, the mid-term report referred to under sub-paragraph (b) above, and, thereafter, take all measures required to ensure the efficient implementation of the Project and the achievement of the objectives thereof, based on the conclusions and recommendations of said report and the Administrator’s views on the matter.
Sample 1
Term Review. The Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2020 (the “Effective Date”) and shall continue for three (3) years unless terminated sooner by either party in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. This Agreement may be renewed for further three (3) year terms upon the parties’ mutual written agreement following Riverview and the Commission’s review of the existing terms of the Agreement. Riverview to provide the Commission with prior written notice of its intention to renew the Agreement at least one (1) Contract Year prior to the expiration of the initial term or any renewal term. Each twelve month period commencing on January 1st and ending on December 31st while the Agreement is in effect shall be referred to herein as a “Contract Year”.
Sample 1
Term Review. The Borrower acknowledges that in two years following the Effective Date, a comprehensive midterm review shall be undertaken jointly by ADB and NHA to review all aspects of the Project implementation, including procurement financing and scheduling matters. All reviews, including the mid-term review, shall be conducted as described in Schedule 1 to FFA.
Sample 1
Term Review. A. This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by the governing bodies of the Parties and shall continue in full force and effect for ten (10) years, unless extended by mutual written agreement of the Parties or unless sooner terminated or superseded, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. In no case shall this Agreement be extended by more than ten
Sample 1
Term Review. The report which the Recipient and Project Implementing Entity shall furnish to the Association, on or about December 31, 2009, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.08 of the General Conditions (for the purposes of this Section “the Mid-Term Review Report”), shall: (i) integrate the results of the monitoring and evaluation activities performed on the progress achieved since commencement of Project implementation in carrying out of the Project; and (ii) set forth the measures recommended to ensure satisfactory Project implementation and achievement of the Project objectives for the remainder of Project implementation; and
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Term Review

  • Midterm Review The Recipient shall: (a) carry out jointly with the Association, no later than 24 months after the Effective Date, a midterm review to assess the status of Project implementation, as measured against the performance indicators referred to in Section II.A.1 (a) of Schedule 2 to this Agreement. Such review shall include an assessment of the following: (i) overall progress in Project implementation; (ii) results of monitoring and evaluation activities; (iii) annual work plans and budgets;

  • Mid-Term Review At Mid Term a meeting shall be held (“Mid Term Review”), where the Incubatee shall present the Mid Term Report, to verify the status of the Activity and to confirm its feasibility.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Term; Renewal Subject to Section 4.02 hereof, this Agreement has a one-year term and shall continue in force until the first anniversary of the date hereof. Thereafter, this Agreement may be renewed for an unlimited number of successive one-year terms upon mutual consent of the parties. It is the Board’s duty to evaluate the performance of the Advisor annually before renewing the Agreement, and each such renewal shall be for a term of no more than one year.

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Subscribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services un- der the plan. Blue Shield has completed documen- tation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required under Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review pro- cess, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • CONTRACT TERM - RENEWAL In addition to any stated renewal periods in the Contract, any Contract or unit portion thereof let by the Commissioner may be extended by the Commissioner for an additional period(s) of up to one year with the written concurrence of the Contractor and Comptroller. Such extension may be exercised on a month-to-month basis or in other stated periods of time during the one year extension.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!