Monitoring and Evaluation Activities Sample Clauses

Monitoring and Evaluation Activities. In 2011, VHTs continued to receive support for accurate, timely tracking and reporting of data from household to village and parish levels using the tools designed by the MOH. The data collected by VHT at the village level is aggregated at parish level by the VHT parish coordinators to generate parish summaries which are forwarded to health workers for aggregation at sub county levels. UHC/MCP facilitates quarterly meetings for capacity building at parish levels to enable feedback on data quality and data sharing on issues identified for action by local leaders, health workers and VHT. UHC/MCP has continued to mentor district data collectors as they use basic excel spreadsheets to aggregate parish register data into quarterly and annual health sub district and district reports. In particular the program has strengthened its support to the District HMIS focal persons to collect quarterly VHT data following the MOH approved tools for problem identification, work planning, monitoring, report preparation and sharing results with appropriate stakeholders. The program team emphasized quality, consolidation and use of data to fill MOH expectations for data reporting. As a result, district data collector capacity in sharing data and evidenced based decision making has increased. A brief monitoring study was conducted to assess the knowledge of VHTs about UHC and whether these VHTs cover health insurance in their health behavior talks within their communities. While almost all VHTs are emphasizing malaria prevention and treatment and, covering almost all of the other VHT job aid health topics in their community talks, only 77.2% talk about health insurance. Most VHTs (89.9%) acknowledged that they have never been asked about health insurance by community members. An additional 41% of XXXx said that when asked about UHC they failed to provide responses to community members. Most VHTs did not know where to obtain UHC registration forms. It was also noted that most of the VHTs have heard about UHC though VHT meetings and trainings, a good number of them acknowledged radio jingles as their primary source of information about UHC. When asked about frequency of topics covered in the last month VHT has the following responses: Topic No. of times Frequency (n=92) Percentage ( %) Seeking treatment for malaria in pregnancy 0 0 0 1-2 27 29.3 3-5 48 52.2 >5 17 18.5 Sleeping under insecticide treated bed nets 0 0 0 1-2 12 13.0 3-5 34 37.0 >5 46 50.0 Seeking treatment for malari...
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Monitoring and Evaluation Activities. Scope of Monitoring and Evaluation Activities to be undertaken will include: • Providing regular reports of project progress toward milestones and production of outputs • Providing reports on benefits realised by the programme, • Providing 12 months of operational data following commissioning of heat recovery project (Phase 2) • Completing relevant programme evaluation surveys (including programme exit) Forecast Costs (These costs must be consistent with those detailed in Annex 5 Eligible Expenditure Schedule (breakdown of forecast grant expenditure) Total Costs for Feasibility Study Phase 1 projects only Total Costs for Preliminary Engineering Phase 1 projects only Total Costs for Detailed Design Phase 2 projects only Total Costs for Construction, Commissioning and Operational Start-up Phase 2 projects only The maximum amount of Grant offered is up to £ insert amount in figures (insert amount in words) for undertaking the Funded Activities identified in Annex 2. This is the total amount of Grant that the Authority may pay, and this amount will not be increased as a result of any overspend or otherwise. This will be paid as follows:
Sample 1
Monitoring and Evaluation Activities. The Program will implement the scholarship holders and student online survey in all three countries. Also, the Program will design the graduate survey and plans for its implementation. The three countries will continue reporting progress of all activities under Results 1 and 2 with the Country Office Tool and collecting student data with the Institution Reporting Tool.
Sample 1
Monitoring and Evaluation Activities. Activity IV.4.1 Collect and analyze data Activity IV. 4. 2 Monitor and evaluate program implementation Activity IV.4.3 Learning agenda Activity IV.4.4 Train staff on data collection tools
Sample 1

Related to Monitoring and Evaluation Activities

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”. b. The AGENCY agrees to permit persons duly authorized by the COUNTY to interview any clients and all current and/or former employees of the AGENCY to be assured of the AGENCY’S satisfactory performance of the terms of this Contract. c. Following such evaluation, monitoring, and/or audit, the COUNTY will deliver a report of its findings and recommendations with regard to the AGENCY’S conformance with this Contract’s terms and conditions to the AGENCY and/or Board of Directors’ President, and members, whenever applicable. If deficiencies are noted, a written notice of corrective action will be issued to the AGENCY which will specify deficiencies and provide a timeline for correction of those deficiencies. Within the designated timeframe in the written notice of corrective action, the AGENCY shall submit to the COUNTY’S CCC manager (“Manager”), or their designee, a corrective action plan to rectify all deficiencies identified by the COUNTY. d. Failure by the AGENCY to correct noted deficiencies, as outlined in the written notice of corrective action, may result in the AGENCY being deemed in breach of the Contract terms. e. The AGENCY shall cooperate with the COUNTY on all reviews to ensure compliance with all applicable COUNTY guidelines and requirements for general fund recipients.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Monitoring and Review The Provider agrees to allow access to the Department for purposes of monitoring and review. This access includes but is not limited to client records, fiscal records, staffing records, policy and procedural manuals, facilities, staff, and children in care of the Department. The Department will conduct quality reviews, which may include site-based quality review visits.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • Monitoring and Audit Seller shall provide information on available audit logs and reports relating to cyber and physical and security. Company may audit Seller's records to ensure Seller's compliance with the terms of this Section 1(b)(iii)G (Critical Infrastructure Protection) of this Attachment B (Facility Owned by Seller), provided that Company has provided reasonable notice to Seller and any such records of Seller's will be treated by Company as confidential.

  • PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND REPORTING Performance indicators

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Monitoring and Reporting The Programme Operator shall monitor, record and report on progress towards the programme’s outcomes in accordance with the provisions contained in the legal framework. The Programme Operator shall ensure that suitable and sufficient monitoring and reporting arrangements are made with the project promoters in order to enable the Programme Operator and the National Focal Point to meet its obligations to the Donors. When reporting on progress achieved in Annual and Final Programme Reports, the Programme Operator shall disaggregate results achieved as appropriate and in accordance with instructions received from the FMO.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!