The SUA Process Sample Clauses

The SUA Process. This section illustrates and introduces the reader to the SUA process. This model is used for the analysis later in this paper, and all the steps and processes are referred to in the model illustrated in figure 4. Figure 4 is to present where the SUA process starts and ends as a way to illustrate a real-world representation of the security protective procurement process and then, in the analysis, connect the C- SCRM aspects to the model. The process is translated to English from the original Swedish version by Xxxxxx Xxxxxx (Gidrup, 2022); see Appendix A. The numbers in the squares are used as identifiers so that the model can be referred to later in the result and analysis section. Figure 4. SUA Process model was translated and inspired by a presentation held by Xxxxxx Xxxxxx (Gidrup, 2022). The original Swedish version of the SUA process is found in Appendix A. It is relevant to understand that the Swedish government does not assess whether the Swedish Protective Security act applies to an operator or not. Instead, it is up to the operator to do a security analysis and an assessment of what information needs to be protected, that is, to determine which protection needs to be taken into place to protect Sweden's security. The guidance for operators lies foremost in chapter 1, §1 Swedish Protective Security Act (2018:585), which says that the law is applicable for any operation that is in any way security sensitive and that sensitive security operations are those that are of concern for Swedish Security. Furthermore, who are in some way affected by international commitments to security protection (Xxxxxxxxx, 2021). For this reason, the security protective act applies to all operators that run a security-sensitive operation in some way. An operation is also considered security sensitive if it handles sensitive security information (Xxxxxxxxx, 2021). As explained earlier, the assessment part is an essential process in the SUA process model, where the operator decides on what operation is subject to procurement, identifies the information that needs to be protected and its classification, and performs a threat and vulnerability analysis. This assessment is the basis for the SUA process as it lays the grounds for the measures (requirements) that need to be in place to ensure protection. These SUA processes are in the grey-coloured square called “Protective Security Assessment performed by Operator”.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to The SUA Process

  • Complaint Process (a) The Employer and the Union agree that all employees of the University are responsible to adhere to the University’s policies on human rights as well as those on the prevention of workplace/sexual violence and workplace/sexual harassment.

  • Complaints Process The School shall establish and adhere to a process for resolving public complaints which shall include an opportunity for complainants to be heard. The final administrative appeal shall be heard by the School's Governing Board, except where the complaint pertains to a possible violation of any law or term under this Contract. The complaints process shall be readily accessible from the School’s website, as described in Section 11.4.1.

  • CENTRAL GRIEVANCE PROCESS The following process pertains exclusively to grievances on central matters that have been referred to the central process. In accordance with the School Boards Collective Bargaining Act central matters may also be grieved locally, in which case local grievance processes will apply.

  • Grievance Process In the event of any dispute arising in connection with any part of this clause, such a dispute shall be processed in accordance with the dispute settling provisions of this Agreement.

  • Disciplinary Process (a) Prior to disciplining an Employee, the Employer will notify the Unit 1 Chairperson, with a copy to the President of Unifor Local 5555, of the nature of the alleged offence.

  • Authorized User Overview and Mini-Bid Process Project Based IT Consulting Services Contracts enable Authorized Users to use a competitive Mini-bid Process to acquire Services on an as-needed basis, for qualified IT Projects. Project Based IT Consulting Services may include, but will not be limited to projects requiring: analysis, data classification, design, development, testing, quality assurance, security and associated training for Information Technology based applications. See section 1.3 Out of Scope Work for a listing of projects expressly excluded from the scope of this Contract. An Authorized User Agreement for Project Based IT Consulting Services will be governed first by the terms and conditions specified in the OGS Centralized Contract and second by terms and conditions added to the Authorized User Statement of Work. Additional terms and conditions shall not conflict with or modify the terms and conditions of the OGS Centralized Contract. NYS Executive Agencies must adhere to all internal processes and approvals including, as required, approval from NYS Office of Information Technology Services. Other Authorized Users must adhere to their own internal processes and approvals. In accordance with Appendix B, section 28, Modification of Contract Terms, an Authorized User may add additional required terms and conditions to this Mini-Bid and resultant Authorized User Agreement only if such terms and conditions (1) are more favorable to the Authorized User and (2) do not conflict with or supersede the OGS Centralized Contract terms and conditions. Examples of additional terms and conditions include: • Expedited delivery timeframe; • Additional incentives, such as discount for expedited payment/Procurement Card use; and • Any additional requirements imposed by the funding source or Federal law.

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Approval Process Tenant shall notify Landlord whether it approves of the submitted working drawings within three business days after Landlord’s submission thereof. If Tenant disapproves of such working drawings, then Tenant shall notify Landlord thereof specifying in reasonable detail the reasons for such disapproval, in which case Landlord shall, within five business days after such notice, revise such working drawings in accordance with Tenant’s objections and submit the revised working drawings to Tenant for its review and approval. Tenant shall notify Landlord in writing whether it approves of the resubmitted working drawings within one business day after its receipt thereof. This process shall be repeated until the working drawings have been finally approved by Landlord and Tenant. If Tenant fails to notify Landlord that it disapproves of the initial working drawings within three business days (or, in the case of resubmitted working drawings, within one business day) after the submission thereof, then Tenant shall be deemed to have approved the working drawings in question. Any delay caused by Tenant’s unreasonable withholding of its consent or delay in giving its written approval as to such working drawings shall constitute a Tenant Delay Day (defined below). If the working drawings are not fully approved (or deemed approved) by both Landlord and Tenant by the 15th business day after the delivery of the initial draft thereof to Tenant, then each day after such time period that such working drawings are not fully approved (or deemed approved) by both Landlord and Tenant shall constitute a Tenant Delay Day.

  • Process a. The grievance shall be referred to one of the following arbitrators:

  • Formal Process A. Step 1: If a grievant is not satisfied with the resolution proposed at the informal level, s/he may within fourteen (14) days after the supervisor's response was due file a formal written grievance with his/her manager on a form provided by the County Personnel Office containing a statement describing the grievance, the section of this Agreement allegedly violated, and remedy requested. The manager (or designee) shall, within seven (7) days have a meeting with the grievant and within seven (7) days thereafter give a written answer to the grievant.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!