Transmission Service Requests. Purpose: Beyond the operating horizon, the impacts of existing transmission service requests are also necessary for the calculation of AFC for future time periods. Inasmuch as a transmission reservation is a right to use and not an obligation to use the transmission system, there is no certainty that any particular reservation will result in a corresponding interchange schedule. This is especially true considering that the pro forma OATT allows firm service on a given path to be redirected as non-firm service on any other path. In addition, the ultimate transmission customer may not have, at a given time, purchased all transmission reservations on a particular source-to-sink path. A further complication is that the duration or firmness of the one portion of the reservation may not be the same as the remaining portion. Since, prior to scheduling, it is difficult to associate reservations involving multiple Transmission Providers that may be used to complete a single transaction, double counting in the AFC determination process is a possibility. It is therefore acknowledged that certain reservations respecting one Party are not required to be incorporated into transmission models developed by the other Party.
Transmission Service Requests. Purpose: Beyond the operating horizon, the impacts of existing transmission service requests are also necessary for the calculation of TTC and ATC/AFC for future time periods. Inasmuch as a transmission reservation is a right to use and not an obligation to use the transmission system, there is no certainty that any particular reservation will result in a corresponding interchange schedule. This is especially true considering that the pro forma tariff allows firm service on a given path to be redirected as non-firm service on any other path. In addition, the ultimate transmission customer may not have, at a given time, purchased all transmission reservations on a particular source-to-sink path. A further complication is that the duration or firmness of the one portion of the reservation may not be the same as the remaining portion. Since the portions of a source to sink reservation may not be able to be associated prior to scheduling, double counting in the ATC/AFC determination process is a possibility. It is acknowledged that reservations respecting one Party are not required to be incorporated into transmission models developed by the other Party.
Transmission Service Requests. A Transmission Service Requests (“TSR”)
Transmission Service Requests. ATSI shall receive and process all transmission service requests in accordance with the Transmission Tariff.
1. ATSI shall be responsible for conducting all System Impact Studies associated with a request for transmission service. The required analysis shall be coordinated between ATSI and the FirstEnergy Operating Companies as follows:
a. ATSI shall provide sufficient information to representatives of the FirstEnergy Operating Companies to allow them to model load consequences of the requested service on Distribution Facilities.
b. ATSI shall coordinate with FirstEnergy Operating Companies representatives when processing requests for service through Distribution Facilities.
c. ATSI shall consult and with the FirstEnergy Operating Companies with respect to the installation of equipment which affects Distribution Facilities.
2. Upon completion of any required System Impact Studies, ATSI shall be responsible for making the final determination as to the amount of firm and non-firm transmission capacity that is available under the Transmission Tariff, and for resolving requests for transmission service in accordance with the terms of the Transmission Tariff.
3. When there is not adequate transmission capability to satisfy a transmission request, ATSI shall relieve or facilitate the relief of the transmission constraint consistent with the terms of the Transmission Tariff.
4. ATSI shall be responsible for documenting all transmission service requests under the Transmission Tariff, the disposition of such requests, and any supporting data required to support the decision with respect to such requests.
Transmission Service Requests. ITC shall receive and process all transmission service requests in accordance with the ITC OATT.
2.2.1 ITC shall be responsible for conducting all System Impact Studies associated with a request for transmission service. To the extent that a request for transmission service under the ITC OATT will or may have an adverse affect on Detroit Edison's ability to safely and reliably serve its transmission customers pursuant to the terms of
Transmission Service Requests. Each Owner acknowledges it is individually responsible for preparing and making all transmission service arrangements to deliver its entitlement from the Plant to its load. Each Owner that is not subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC under Part II of the Federal Power Act and that may own an undivided tenant-in-common interest in the Common Interconnection Facilities and the Common Interconnection Facilities Upgrades agrees to provide transmission service to the other Owners that is not unduly discriminatory or preferential; provided, however, that no Owner shall be required to provide any service that does not allow it to collect its revenue requirement and appropriate return, and to reliably serve its customers.
Transmission Service Requests. 2
4.1. A Transmission Service Requests (“TSR”) 2 4.2. Processing of a Long-Term Transmission Service Request 2 4.3. Processing of a Short-Term Transmission Service Request 3 4.4. Submission of a Transmission Service Request Using the Request Portal 4
4.4.1. Request Portal Access 4
4.4.2. Eligibility to Submit a Transmission Service Request through the Request Portal 4 4.4.3. Description of the Request Portal and Its Fields 4 4.4.4. Application for Long-Term Transmission Service 5 4.4.5 NorthWestern Energy Performs Studies 6
Transmission Service Requests. Michigan Transco shall receive and process all transmission service requests in accordance with the Michigan Transco Transmission Tariffs.
2.2.1 Michigan Transco shall be responsible for conducting all System Impact Studies associated with a request for transmission service. To the extent that a request for transmission service under the Michigan Transco Transmission Tariffs will or may have an
Transmission Service Requests. Purpose: Beyond the operating horizon, the impacts of existing transmission service requests are also necessary for the calculation of TTC and ATC/AFC for future time periods. Inasmuch as a transmission reservation is a right to use and not an obligation to use the transmission system, there is no certainty that any particular reservation will result in a corresponding interchange schedule. This is especially true considering that the pro forma tariff allows firm service on a given path to be redirected as non-firm service on any other path. In addition, the ultimate transmission customer may not have, at a given time, purchased all transmission reservations on a particular source-to-sink path. A further complication is that the duration or firmness of the one portion of the reservation may not be the same as the remaining portion. Since, prior to scheduling, it is difficult to associate reservations involving multiple Transmission Providers that may be used to complete a single transaction, double counting in the ATC/AFC determination process is a possibility. It is therefore acknowledged that certain reservations respecting one Party are not required to be incorporated into transmission models developed by the other Party.
Transmission Service Requests. Purpose: Beyond the operating horizon, the impacts of existing transmission service requests are also necessary for the calculation of TTC and ATC/AFC for future time periods. Inasmuch as a transmission reservation is a right to use and not an obligation to use the transmission system, there is no certainty that any particular reservation will result in a corresponding interchange schedule. This is especially true considering that the pro forma tariff allows firm service on a given path to be redirected as non-firm service on any other path. In Issued by: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx, President and CEO, Midwest ISO Effective: December 1, 2004 Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxx, President and CEO, Southwest Power Pool, Inc. Issued on: December 1, 2004 Filed to comply with order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Docket No. ER04-1096-000, Midwest ISO First Revised Sheet No. 19 FERC Electric Tariff, Rate Schedule No. 6 Superseding Original Sheet No. 19 Southwest Power Pool, Inc. FERC Electric Tariff, Rate Schedule No. 9 addition, the ultimate transmission customer may not have, at a given time, purchased all transmission reservations on a particular source-to-sink path. A further complication is that the duration or firmness of the one portion of the reservation may not be the same as the remaining portion. Since, prior to scheduling, it is difficult to associate reservations involving multiple Transmission Providers that may be used to complete a single transaction, double counting in the ATC/AFC determination process is a possibility. It is therefore acknowledged that certain reservations respecting one Party are not required to be incorporated into transmission models developed by the other Party.
