USER CONSULTATION PROTOCOL Sample Clauses

USER CONSULTATION PROTOCOL. ‌ (a) Project Co acknowledges that review of the Design by the Authority and consultation with the Facility Users is an essential step in the completion of the detailed design of the Facility. Accordingly, Project Co will conduct consultations with the User Consultation Groups as described in this Appendix 2C. The Authority will make reasonable efforts, as requested by Project Co, to assist and support Project Co with the consultation process, but nothing in this Section 4 will be interpreted to give the Authority responsibility for the Design, the Design schedule or the user consultation process. (b) The Authority will establish User Consultation Groups that may include clinical Facility Users (such as physicians and nurses) and technical Facility Users (such as staff from the following Authority departments: facility planning, information management and information technology, security, infection control, ergonomics, logistics and portering, housekeeping, food services, laundry, foundation, switchboard, fire, ambulance, RCMP, the City, staff from various departments who will be responsible for the various types of Equipment included in the New Facility) and the Authority’s consultants and engineers. The Authority may also from time to time include patients, families and neighbours in the user consultation process. (c) Unless agreed by the Authority, all aspects of the Design will be subject to review by one or more User Consultation Groups. (d) The User Consultation Groups will include a User Consultation Group designated as the “Scheduling User Group” with responsibility for coordinating the Design review process with Project Co. (e) Project Co’s Service Provider team will be fully integrated into the design team to ensure that the most sustainable design decisions are informed not only as they relate to the initial capital costs but also to the operational efficiencies and effectiveness of the systems for the whole life of the New Facility. (f) Unless otherwise agreed, Submittals will be provided and reviewed in accordance with the following: (1) Draft Submittal to the Authority: (A) Project Co will provide a draft Submittal as indicated on the Submittal Schedule that includes all relevant material with a covering transmittal indicating the purpose of the Submittal, and the information that should be reviewed by the Authority and the User Consultation Groups. (B) All changes from a previous Submittal should be clearly indicated in accordance with Secti...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
USER CONSULTATION PROTOCOL. 4.1 The Design-Builder acknowledges that review of the Design by the Owner and consultation with the Facility users is an essential step in the completion of the detailed design of the Facility. Accordingly, the Design-Builder will conduct consultations with representatives of the Facility users (the “User Consultation Groups”) as described in this Schedule 2. The Owner will make reasonable efforts, as requested by the Design-Builder, to assist and support the Design-Builder with the consultation process, but nothing in this Section 4 will be interpreted to give the Owner responsibility for the Design, the Design schedule or the user consultation process. 4.2 The Owner will establish User Consultation Groups that may include the Owner, the Owner’s Representatives, employees, agents, contractors and subcontractors, curators, researchers, archivists, and collections managers. 4.3 Unless agreed by the Owner, all aspects of the Design will be subject to review by one or more User Consultation Groups. 4.4 The User Consultation Groups will include a User Consultation Group designated as the “Core User Group” with responsibility for coordinating the Design review process with the Design-Builder. 4.5 Unless otherwise agreed, Submittals will be provided and reviewed in accordance with the following: (a) Draft Submittal to the Owner: (i) The Design-Builder will provide a draft Submittal as indicated on the Submittal Schedule that includes all relevant material with a covering transmittal indicating the purpose of the Submittal, and the information that should be reviewed by the Owner and the User Consultation Groups. (ii) All changes from a previous Submittal should be clearly indicated in accordance with Section 9.2 of this Schedule 2. (b) Draft Submittal to the User Consultation Group: (i) Within five Business Days following the draft Submittal, the Design-Builder will present the relevant material at a meeting of the relevant User Consultation Group(s). (ii) The presentation will be made in person or, if the Owner agrees, by videoconference by the Design-Builder’s Consultant or, if the Owner agrees, the Design-Builder’s Professional Engineer or other subject matter expert. (iii) The Design-Builder’s presentation will include a page-by-page review of the draft Submittal. (iv) The Design-Builder must be in attendance, preferably in person but teleconference is acceptable. (v) During the presentation, a representative of the Design-Builder will take “live minutes” s...
USER CONSULTATION PROTOCOL. (a) Project Co acknowledges that review of the Design by the Owner and consultation with the Facility Users is an essential step in the completion of the detailed design of the Facility. Accordingly, Project Co will conduct consultations with the User Consultation Groups as described in this Appendix 2C. The Owner will make reasonable efforts, as requested by Project Co, to assist and support Project Co with the consultation process, but nothing in this Section 4 will be interpreted to give the Owner responsibility for the Design, the Design schedule or the user consultation process. (b) The Owner will establish User Consultation Groups that may include clinical Facility Users and technical Facility Users. The Owner may also include patients, families, neighbours and any other Persons that the Owner considers necessary in the user consultation process. (c) Unless agreed by the Owner, all aspects of the Design will be subject to review by one or more User Consultation Groups. (d) [Not Used] (e) Unless otherwise agreed, Submittals will be provided and reviewed in accordance with the following:

Related to USER CONSULTATION PROTOCOL

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Signaling protocol The Parties will interconnect their networks using SS7 signaling where Technically Feasible and available as defined in GR 905 Telcordia Standards including ISDN User Part (ISUP) for trunk signaling and TCAP for CCS-based features in the Interconnection of their networks. All Network Operations Forum (NOF) adopted standards shall be adhered to. Where available, CenturyLink signaling services to link its Signaling Transfer Points (STPs) for CLEC switches which connect to CenturyLink’s STPs via “A” links or for CLEC’s STPs to connect to CenturyLink’s STPs via “D” links which are dedicated to the transport of signaling for local Interconnection, may be ordered from the CenturyLink Tariff.

  • Protocol The attached Protocol shall be an integral part of this Agreement.

  • Service Specification The Parties have agreed upon the scope and specification of the Services provided under this Service Agreement in the Service Specification.

  • JOINT CONSULTATION 21.01 The parties acknowledge the mutual benefits to be derived from joint consultation and are prepared to enter into discussion aimed at the development and introduction of appropriate machinery for the purpose of providing joint consultation on matters of common interest. 21.02 Within five (5) days of notification of consultation served by either party, the Alliance shall notify the Employer in writing of the representatives authorized to act on behalf of the Alliance for consultation purposes. 21.03 Upon request of either party, the parties to this Agreement shall consult meaningfully at the appropriate level about contemplated changes in conditions of employment or working conditions not governed by this Agreement. 21.04 Without prejudice to the position the Employer or the Alliance may wish to take in future about the desirability of having the subjects dealt with by the provisions of collective agreements, the subjects that may be determined as appropriate for joint consultation will be by agreement of the parties.

  • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out – 6.1.1 The standards and procedures for evaluating the Employee’s performance; and 6.1.2 The intervals for the evaluation of the Employee’s performance. 6.2 Despite the establishment of agreed intervals for evaluation, the Employer may in addition review the Employee’s performance at any stage while the contract of employment remains in force; 6.3 Personal growth and development needs identified during any performance review discussion must be documented in a Personal Development Plan as well as the actions agreed to and implementation must take place within set time frames; 6.4 The Employee’s performance will be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan (IDP) as described in 6.6 – 6.12 below; 6.5 The Employee will submit quarterly performance reports (SDBIP) and a comprehensive annual performance report at least one week prior to the performance assessment meetings to the Evaluation Panel Chairperson for distribution to the panel members for preparation purposes; 6.6 Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the performance plan: 6.6.1 Each KPI or group of KPIs shall be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance targets have been met and with due regard to ad-hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPI, and the score of the employer will be given to and explained to the Employee during the assessment interview. 6.6.2 A rating on the five-point scale shall be provided for each KPI or group of KPIs which will then be multiplied by the weighting to calculate the final score; 6.6.3 The Employee will submit his self-evaluation to the Employer prior to the formal assessment; 6.6.4 In the instance where the employee could not perform due to reasons outside the control of the employer and employee, the KPI will not be considered during the evaluation. The employee should provide sufficient evidence in such instances; and 6.6.5 An overall score will be calculated based on the total of the individual scores calculated above.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!