WORKLOAD FOR LIBRARIAN MEMBERS Sample Clauses

WORKLOAD FOR LIBRARIAN MEMBERS. 18.01 A Librarian member’s workload shall consist of the duties and responsibilities specified in Articles 16.08 – 16.11 and shall be performed within an average work week of 35 hours. The University Librarian shall meet with each Library member on an annual basis. Topics for discussion at this meeting shall include but not necessarily be limited to: current workload, departmental goals and objectives, personal goals and objectives. Following this meeting, the University Librarian shall communicate the workload to the librarian member. Subject to operational requirements, workload may be adjusted throughout the year. A Librarian member who believes his/her assigned workload is excessive in relation to the workload of other Librarian members has the right to have the Xxxxxxx and Vice-President (Academic) review his/her workload. 18.02 For hours worked in excess of the normal workload, equivalent time off shall be scheduled, the day and time being subject to the approval of the University Librarian. 18.03 The University Librarian has responsibility for the scheduling of evening and weekend duties of members, taking into account the following: (A) the needs and priorities of the Library; (B) the member's engagement in committee service; and, (C) any other relevant factors. Whenever possible, the member concerned shall be consulted with respect to the schedule to be assigned. A member shall not be scheduled for more than one evening and one weekend shift per week for reference and information desk services, except for special conditions such as staff shortages owing to vacations, illness, vacancies, special projects, etc. 18.04 Librarians assigned to work by the University Librarian on statutory holidays as defined in Article 36.02 shall be entitled to compensatory time off at the rate of one and a half hours for each hour worked. The scheduling of such time off shall be subject to the approval of the University Librarian.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
WORKLOAD FOR LIBRARIAN MEMBERS. 18.01 A Librarian member’s workload shall consist of the duties and responsibilities specified in Articles
WORKLOAD FOR LIBRARIAN MEMBERS. On the average the workload for a member is hours per week. In addition to the duties and responsibilities specified in the position description each member, the Chief Librarian may also assign reasonable duties which are not in conflict with this Agreement. The Chief Librarian shall indicate to the member the length of time the assignment is expected to take and whether such an assignment is expected to recur. Whenever possible, the member concerned shall be consulted with respect to the additional duties to be assigned. For hours worked in excess of the normal workload, equivalent time off shall be scheduled, the day and time being subject to the approval of the Chief Librarian. The Chief Librarian has responsibility for the scheduling of evening and weekend duties of members, taking into account the following: the needs and priorities of the Library; the member’s engagement in committee service; and, any other relevant factors. Whenever possible, the member concerned shall be consulted with respect to the schedule to be assigned. A member shall not be scheduled for more than one evening and one weekend shift per week for reference and information desk services, except for special conditions such as staff shortages owing to vacations, illness, vacancies, special projects, etc. Librarians assigned to work by the Chief Librarian on statutory holidays as defined in Article shall be entitled to compensatory time off at the rate of one and a half hours for each hour worked. The scheduling of such time off shall be subject to the approval of the Chief Librarian.
WORKLOAD FOR LIBRARIAN MEMBERS. 18.01 A Librarian member shall accept his/her workload as communicated to him/her by the University Librarian. On the average the workload for a member is 35 hours per week. A Librarian member who believes that his/her assigned workload is excessive in relation to the workload of other Librarian members has the right to have the Vice-President (Academic) review his/her workload. 18.02 For hours worked in excess of the normal workload, equivalent time off shall be scheduled, the day and time being subject to the approval of the University Librarian. 18.03 The University Librarian has responsibility for the scheduling of evening and weekend duties of members, taking into account the following: (A) the needs and priorities of the Library; (B) the member's engagement in committee service; and, (C) any other relevant factors. Whenever possible, the member concerned shall be consulted with respect to the schedule to be assigned. A member shall not be scheduled for more than one evening and one weekend shift per week for reference and information desk services, except for special conditions such as staff shortages owing to vacations, illness, vacancies, special projects, etc. 18.04 Librarians assigned to work by the University Librarian on statutory holidays as defined in Article 36.02 shall be entitled to compensatory time off at the rate of one and a half hours for each hour worked. The scheduling of such time off shall be subject to the approval of the University Librarian.
WORKLOAD FOR LIBRARIAN MEMBERS. 18.01 A Librarian member’s workload shall consist of the duties and responsibilities specified in Articles 16.08 16.11 and shall be performed within an average work week of 35 hours. The University Librarian shall meet with each Library member on an annual basis. Topics for discussion at this meeting shall include but not necessarily be limited to: current workload, departmental goals and objectives, personal goals and objectives. Following this meeting, the University Librarian shall communicate the workload to the librarian member. Subject to operational requirements, workload may be adjusted throughout the year. A Librarian member who believes his/her assigned workload is excessive in relation to the workload of other Librarian members has the right to have the Vice-President (Academic) review his/her workload.

Related to WORKLOAD FOR LIBRARIAN MEMBERS

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Goods and Works International Competitive Bidding. Goods and works shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of International Competitive Bidding.

  • Project Steering Committee 1. For a sound implementation and management of the project, a steering committee shall be set up in line with provisions of the programme manual. 2. The steering committee is the decision-making body of the project and it shall be composed by representatives of the LP and all PPs duly authorised to represent the respective LP and PP institutions. It shall be chaired by the LP and it shall meet on a regular basis. Associated partners shall be invited to take part in the steering committee in an advisory capacity. External key stakeholders may also be invited to take part to one or more meetings in an observer/advisory capacity. 3. The steering committee shall at least: a. be responsible for monitoring and validating the implementation of the project and the achievement of the planned results as in the approved application form; b. perform the financial monitoring of the project implementation and to decide on any budget modifications as in § 11 of this agreement; c. monitor and manage deviations of the project implementation; d. decide on project modifications (e.g. partnership, budget, activities, and duration) if needed; e. be responsible for the settlement of any disputes within the partnership (as stipulated in § 22 of this agreement). 4. Further aspects, including the creation of sub-groups or task forces, may be set out in the rules of procedure of the steering committee.

  • Other Methods of Procurement of Goods and Works The following table specifies the methods of procurement, other than International Competitive Bidding, which may be used for goods and works. The Procurement Plan shall specify the circumstances under which such methods may be used: (a) National Competitive Bidding (b) Shopping (c) Direct Contracting

  • COVID-19 Vaccine Passports Pursuant to Texas Health and Safety Code, Section 161.0085(c), Contractor certifies that it does not require its customers to provide any documentation certifying the customer’s COVID-19 vaccination or post-transmission recovery on entry to, to gain access to, or to receive service from the Contractor’s business. Contractor acknowledges that such a vaccine or recovery requirement would make Contractor ineligible for a state-funded contract.

  • Joint Steering Committee Promptly after the Effective Date, the Parties will form a Joint Steering Committee (the “JSC”) composed of an equal number of employees of each of Curis and Genentech, but in no event to exceed four (4) members from each Party. The JSC shall determine the specific goals for the Collaboration, shall manage the ongoing research conducted under the Collaboration in accordance with the Research Plan, shall monitor the progress and results of such work, and shall oversee and coordinate the development and commercialization of Compounds (other than Collaboration Products); provided, however, that the JSC shall not have decision-making authority with respect to the development and commercialization of Collaboration Products, which shall be governed by the CSC. The presence of at least one (1) representative of each Party shall constitute a quorum for the conduct of any JSC meeting. All decisions of the JSC shall require unanimous approval, with the representatives of each Party collectively having one (1) vote, provided in the event of a deadlock, the issue shall be referred to the Chief Executive Officer of Curis and the Senior Vice President of Research of Genentech, or their respective designees, who shall promptly meet and attempt in good faith to resolve such issue within thirty (30) days. If such executives cannot resolve such matter, then Genentech shall have final decision-making authority with regard to decisions regarding the Collaboration (including, without limitation, the JSC’s designation of a Compound as either a Lead Product or Excluded Product); provided, however, that in no event shall Genentech have the right or power to take any of the following actions without the approval of Curis’ representatives on the JSC: (a) approve the initial Research Plan (an outline of which has been agreed upon by the Parties as of the Effective Date); (b) amend or modify this Agreement or the Research Plan; (c) resolve any such matter in a manner that conflicts with the provisions of this Agreement (including, without limitation, the Research Plan); (d) make any decision with respect to the development or commercialization of Curis Products; or (e) make any decision with respect to the prosecution, maintenance, defense or enforcement of any Curis Patents. The JSC shall meet at such frequency as the JSC agrees, except that, until the filing of the first IND for a Lead Product utilizing Systemic Delivery in a Major Market, the JSC shall meet on at least a quarterly basis. Meetings of the JSC, and JSC dispute resolution meetings between Curis’ Chief Executive Officer and Genentech’s Senior Vice President of Research (or their designees), may be conducted by videoconference, teleconference or in person, as agreed by the Parties, and the Parties shall agree upon the time and place of meetings. A reasonable number of additional representatives of a Party may attend meetings of the JSC in a non-voting capacity. The JSC shall exist for so long as either any work is being conducted under the Research Plan or any Compound is being developed or commercialized by Genentech, Curis, or any of their respective Affiliate(s) or sublicensee(s) in any Major Market. The JSC shall also be responsible for designating one or more representatives of each Party with expertise in patent law (which individuals need not be members of the JSC) to oversee intellectual property matters relating to the Collaboration, subject to the provisions of Article 10, and such patent committee shall coordinate with and report to the JSC.

  • Loop Provisioning Involving Integrated Digital Loop Carriers 2.6.1 Where Xxxx has requested an Unbundled Loop and BellSouth uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the End User and BellSouth has a suitable alternate facility available, BellSouth will make such alternative facilities available to Xxxx. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, BellSouth will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for Xxxx (e.g. hairpinning): 1. Roll the circuit(s) from the IDLC to any spare copper that exists to the customer premises. 2. Roll the circuit(s) from the IDLC to an existing DLC that is not integrated. 3. If capacity exists, provide "side-door" porting through the switch. 4. If capacity exists, provide "Digital Access Cross Connect System (DACS)- door" porting (if the IDLC routes through a DACS prior to integration into the switch). 2.6.2 Arrangements 3 and 4 above require the use of a designed circuit. Therefore, non- designed Loops such as the SL1 voice grade and UCL-ND may not be ordered in these cases. 2.6.3 If no alternate facility is available, and upon request from Xxxx, and if agreed to by both Parties, BellSouth may utilize its Special Construction (SC) process to determine the additional costs required to provision facilities. Xxxx will then have the option of paying the one-time SC rates to place the Loop.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria (Reactive Power A wind generating plant shall maintain a power factor within the range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging, measured at the Point of Interconnection as defined in this LGIA, if the ISO’s System Reliability Impact Study shows that such a requirement is necessary to ensure safety or reliability. The power factor range standards can be met using, for example without limitation, power electronics designed to supply this level of reactive capability (taking into account any limitations due to voltage level, real power output, etc.) or fixed and switched capacitors if agreed to by the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, or a combination of the two. The Developer shall not disable power factor equipment while the wind plant is in operation. Wind plants shall also be able to provide sufficient dynamic voltage support in lieu of the power system stabilizer and automatic voltage regulation at the generator excitation system if the System Reliability Impact Study shows this to be required for system safety or reliability.

  • Joint Research Committee The Parties hereby establish a committee to facilitate the Research Program as follows:

  • RE-WEIGHING PRODUCT Deliveries are subject to re- weighing at the point of destination by the Authorized User. If shrinkage occurs which exceeds that normally allowable in the trade, the Authorized User shall have the option to require delivery of the difference in quantity or to reduce the payment accordingly. Such option shall be exercised in writing by the Authorized User.

  • Research Plan The Parties recognize that the Research Plan describes the collaborative research and development activities they will undertake and that interim research goals set forth in the Research Plan are good faith guidelines. Should events occur that require modification of these goals, then by mutual agreement the Parties can modify them through an amendment, according to Paragraph 13.6.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!