Topics for Discussion Sample Clauses

Topics for Discussion. The subjects discussed may relate generally to this Agreement, but shall not be for the purpose of discussing pending grievances or for collective bargaining on any subject. The topics for discussion will include, but are not limited to: a) Methods of improving Employer/employee relations and productivity. b) Safety and health problems of a continuing nature. c) Affirmative action goals and methods of implementation. d) Other problems which have an impact on conditions of employment.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Topics for Discussion. Collective bargaining matters are not within the scope of the matters that may be considered by the Joint Committee.
Sample 1Sample 2
Topics for Discussion.  Do caretakers and families recognize danger signs for seeking care for the newborn in the period after childbirth? Do they recognize danger signs for seeking care for children? Are more sick newborns and children reaching health facilities in the last year? If not, why not? Can anything be done to change how well caretakers recognize danger signs?  Are sick newborns and children taken to community health workers when they are sick? If not, where do they go first? Why do they go to this source first? What could be done to encourage them to seek care from community health workers first?  Have there been any problems with the use of antimicrobials by community health workers? Do they give a complete course of medicines when they have to give them? Do they charge for medicines?  Do caretakers referred to the health facilities always accept referral? If not, what are the reasons they do not go for referral? What could be done to improve their likelihood of going for referral?  Has there been any improvement in availability of transportation for sick newborns and children who need urgent referral? What methods have been used in this district or community? Are other options available? What needs to be done to improve the availability of transportation?  If a sick newborn or child is able to be taken to the facility, are they treated well/ correctly?  Is it difficult for community health workers to follow-up sick newborns and children in the home after they have been treated? If yes, why is it difficult?
Sample 1
Topics for Discussion.  What are the most useful approaches to giving information about the newborn and child health in your experience? Are the materials available for health education/community mobilization adequate? Are other materials needed? What materials are needed?  Do local partners provide support for community-based activities? If not, why not? Would you like more involvement of partners? Which partners should be more involved and how?  Do you think there are adequate numbers of community health workers and TBAs working in the community? If not, why not? How many community health workers and TBAs are required? Do you think the selection process for community health workers and TBAs works well? Are the best people trained for these jobs? If not, what would you do differently?  Have you had a problem with community health workers and TBAs leaving their jobs? What is done now to encourage them to continue working? Could more be done to motivate them to continue? What more would you do to ensure that they remain in their jobs?  Are there individuals or groups in the community who could be providing information or services, but who are not being used? If yes, which individuals or groups do you mean? Why are they not being used? What could be done to use them better?  Can all people in the community reach health facilities? What are the barriers to getting to health facilities? What would you do to increase access to health facilities in this area? 1 Luftwanyama District Health Office Dr. X, District Medical Officer Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Acting District Medical Officer 2 Copperbelt Province Health Office Dr. Xxxxxxx Xx’xxxx, Provincial Medical Officer 3 Chantete Rural Health Center Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx-Enrolled Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx – (XXX Xxxxxxxx) Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx – TBA Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx - NHC Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx – CHW Chantete Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx – TBA Chantete Xxxxxx Xxxxxx – CHW Chantete Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx – Xxxxxx NHC Xxxxxx Xxxxxx – NHC Vice Chairperson/Chief Induna Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx–TBA Chantete Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx –NHC Secretary 1 child caretaker 5 Mibenge Health Center X. Xxxxxxx-NHC Member (Fipokola) Webby Mushitu-NHC Member (Mibenge) Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx-NHC Member (Mibenge) Xxxxxxx Xxxxx-NHC Member (Fipokola) Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx-TBA (Mibenge) Webby Kabombeka-CHW (Masasa2) Xxxx Xxxxxx-TBA (Fipundu) Loveness Kalando-TBA (Kamupundu) Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx-XXX (Kamupundu) Xxxx Xxxxxxx –NHC Member (Xxxxxx) Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx-NHC Member (Xxxxxx) Xxxxx Xxxxxxx-Xxxxxxxxx (Kampundu) 1 child ca...
Sample 1
Topics for Discussion. This will be the second ACRSM meeting of 2024. In this meeting, the ACRSM will address, consistent with its charter’s mandate, topics related to the role of nongovernmental mechanisms in supporting the terrorism risk insurance market. Specifically, the ACRSM will hear presentations addressing (1) FIO’s partnership with the National Science Foundation (NSF) to establish a new Industry-University Cooperative Research Center (IUCRC) to provide research, analysis, and thought leadership to improve the insurance sector’s modeling and underwriting of terrorism and catastrophic cyber risks.;
Sample 1
Topics for Discussion. The Consultation Working Group may discuss: a. Proposed Activity consultation and engagement activities; b. land use planning related issues; c. shared decision making processes and structures; d. consultation tools and systems; e. archaeology and cultural heritage resource management; f. socio-economic impacts of Proposed Activities; g. cumulative effects of Proposed Activities; h. access management guidelines; i. Strategic Topics; j. addition or withdrawal of a Provincial Agency; k. areas of particular concern; and
Sample 1
Topics for Discussion. Describe the project that community partners and faculty have developed. How is this project reciprocal? What are faculty’s project goals? What are the intended learning outcomes for students? What are the community partners’ project goals for their organization? What are the intended learning outcomes for students? What are the mutually agreed upon expectations for this project? What have faculty and CP done to match academic calendar with community partner calendar and needs? What is the established channel for constructive feedback throughout the project? What is the plan for a culminating event or final product? What methods will faculty, students, and CP use to a reflect on this collaboration? What role do you imagine the CCCE will play in this collaboration? Comments: o Provide community engagement opportunities that are significant and/or challenging to the students, relevant to course learning objectives, and address community partners’ goals. o Provide training, supervision, feedback, resources and sufficient information about the organization to aid in the success of students’ ACE projects. o Participate in the reflective process. o Be aware of the organization’s needs and provide assistance where and when needed. o Contact the community partner to arrange initial meeting to discuss engagement hours and project. o Adhere to organizational rules and procedures, including confidentiality of organization and client information. o Periodically reflect upon and re-evaluate the service experience keeping in mind the course objectives. o Operate with integrity and professionalism at all times; which includes being punctual, dressing appropriately, meeting deadlines, and being open to supervision and feedback that will facilitate learning and personal growth. o Provide students with structure and guidance to process and reflect on civic engagement experiences. o Assist students in connecting their community-based learning experience with course learning objectives. o Participate in evaluation and reflective processes.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Topics for Discussion. In what areas have you seen your Mentoree grow during the time you have spent together? What have you enjoyed about working with your Mentoree? What seemed to be the most difficult session together and why? What seemed to be the most satisfying session together and why? In what ways do you feel you have been the most helpful? What have you gained from working with your Mentoree? What feedback would you like from your Mentoree about his/her experience in working with you? What are your hopes for your Mentoree at this point in time? In retrospect, where could you have been more helpful? Check this out with your Mentoree to see if s/he agrees with you. Would you like to continue a mentoring relationship with your Mentoree after ending this program? If yes, what would be the nature of this relationship? How does your Mentoree feel about this?
Sample 1
Topics for Discussion. In what areas have you grown as a result of your involvement in this Mentoring Program? What specific things did your Mentor do or say that helped you to grow in these areas? What seemed to be the most difficult session together and why? What seemed to be the most satisfying session together and why? What do you feel you have given your mentor as a result of his/her relationship with you? What feedback would you like from your Mentor about his/her experience in working with you? Would you like to continue a mentoring relationship with your Mentor after ending this program? If yes, how would you like to structure this relationship: phone calls, meetings, etc.?
Sample 1

Related to Topics for Discussion

  • Informal Discussion If an employee has a problem relating to a work situation, the employee is encouraged to request a meeting with his or her immediate supervisor to discuss the problem in an effort to clarify the issue and to work cooperatively towards settlement.

  • Informal Discussions The employee's concerns will be presented orally by the employee to the appropriate supervisor. Every effort shall be made by all concerned in an informal manner to develop an understanding of the facts and the issues in order to create a climate which will lead to resolution of the problem. If the employee is not satisfied with the informal discussion(s) relative to the matter in question, he/she may proceed to the formal grievance procedure.

  • Discussion Staff has reviewed the proposal relative to all relevant policies and advise that it is reasonably consistent with the intent of the MPS. Attachment B provides an evaluation of the proposed development agreement in relation to the relevant MPS policies.

  • Results and Discussion Table 1 (top) shows the root mean square error (RMSE) between the three tests for different numbers of topics. These results show that all three tests largely agree with each other but as the sample size (number of topics) decreases, the agreement decreases. In line with the results found for 50 topics, the randomization and bootstrap tests agree more with the t-test than with each other. We looked at pairwise scatterplots of the three tests at the different topic sizes. While there is some disagreement among the tests at large p-values, i.e. those greater than 0.5, none of the tests would predict such a run pair to have a significant difference. More interesting to us is the behavior of the tests for run pairs with lower p-values. Table 1 (bottom) shows the RMSE among the three tests for run pairs that all three tests agreed had a p-value greater than 0.0001 and less than 0.5. In contrast to all pairs with p-values 0.0001 (Table 1 top), these run pairs are of more importance to the IR researcher since they are the runs that require a statistical test to judge the significance of the per- formance difference. For these run pairs, the randomization and t tests are much more in agreement with each other than the bootstrap is with either of the other two tests. Looking at scatterplots, we found that the bootstrap tracks the t-test very well but shows a systematic bias to produce p-values smaller than the t-test. As the number of topics de- creases, this bias becomes more pronounced. Figure 1 shows a pairwise scatterplot of the three tests when the number of topics is 10. The randomization test also tends to produce smaller p-values than the t-test for run pairs where the t- test estimated a p-value smaller than 0.1, but at the same time, produces some p-values greater than the t-test’s. As Figure 1 shows, the bootstrap consistently gives smaller p- values than the t-test for these smaller p-values. While the bootstrap and the randomization test disagree with each other more than with the t-test, Figure 1 shows that for a low number of topics, the randomization test shows less noise in its agreement with the bootstrap com- pared to the t-test for small p-values.

  • Mutual Discussions The Employer and the Union acknowledge the mutual benefits to be derived from dialogue between the parties and are prepared to discuss matters of common interest.

  • Existing Discussions The Company agrees that it will immediately cease and cause to be terminated any existing activities, discussions or negotiations with any Persons conducted heretofore with respect to any Acquisition Proposal. The Company agrees that it will take the necessary steps to promptly inform the individuals or entities referred to in the first sentence hereof of the obligations undertaken in this Section 6.2. The Company also agrees that it will promptly request each Person that has heretofore executed a confidentiality agreement in connection with its consideration of acquiring it or any of its Subsidiaries to return or destroy all confidential information heretofore furnished to such Person by or on behalf of it or any of its Subsidiaries.

  • No Existing Discussions As of the date hereof, the Company is not engaged, directly or indirectly, in any discussions or negotiations with any other party with respect to an Acquisition Proposal.

  • Forecasting Manager and Sprint PCS will work cooperatively to generate mutually acceptable forecasts of important business metrics including traffic volumes, handset sales, subscribers and Collected Revenues for the Sprint PCS Products and Services. The forecasts are for planning purposes only and do not constitute Manager's obligation to meet the quantities forecast.

  • Settlement Discussions This Agreement is part of a proposed settlement of matters that could otherwise be the subject of litigation among the Parties hereto. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission of any kind. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and any applicable state rules of evidence, this Agreement and all negotiations relating thereto shall not be admissible into evidence in any proceeding other than to prove the existence of this Agreement or in a proceeding to enforce the terms of this Agreement.

  • Forecasts Any forecasts provided by DXC shall not constitute a commitment of any type by DXC.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!