WORKLOAD FOR TEACHING FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS Sample Clauses

WORKLOAD FOR TEACHING FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS. 1. The Annual Workload Plan shall be fair and equitable, and developed and assigned after consultation with each Member. To help ensure this goal the Board shall post the assignments concerning all Members in the Unit. 2. The academic workload of a Member includes in varying proportions: teaching/professional librarianship/archives management, including the supervision of graduate and undergraduate learners, as well as extracurricular and elective teaching; scholarly activity including commitments to external granting agencies; governance, administrative duties, and other contributions to the School and Lakehead and Laurentian Universities. a) the workload of the Lecturer IPE shall be assigned as per the job description as mutually agreed by the Parties in a fair and equitable manner, and developed and assigned after consultation with each Lecturer IPE; b) and workload in the area of teaching shall be greater than that of administrative service and research, each of the latter of which shall be approximately equal to each other (not greater than ten percent [10%] of overall workload). 3. The assignment of the workload shall be communicated in reasonable detail, in writing, to the Member by June 1 by the immediate supervisor. The time-tabling of the teaching load/library assignment shall be communicated in writing to the Member by July 1 by the immediate supervisor. For Lecturer IPE Members, each Lecturer IPE shall meet with their immediate supervisor by June 1st of each year to discuss expectations and priorities for the coming year, however, expectations and priorities may change through the year upon consultations with the Lecturer IPE Member. 4. The composition of the workload of particular Members may vary with their discipline, and will take into account the capabilities of the Members. In assigning teaching duties the immediate supervisor shall also consider the following factors: career stage of the Member, the Member's area of expertise, class size, whether or not the Member has ever taught the material before, whether or not the material or course being taught is newly developed. In the assignment of teaching loads, the immediate supervisor, in consultation with the academic Units, shall consider not only the number of hours taught by a Member, but the type of teaching, as well as administrative and other duties. Members' workloads shall also be subject to the following normal maximum for assigned workload:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
WORKLOAD FOR TEACHING FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS. 1. The Annual Workload Plan shall be fair and equitable, and developed and assigned after consultation with each Member. To help ensure this goal the Board shall post the assignments concerning all Members in the Unit. 2. The academic workload of a Member includes in varying proportions: teaching/professional librarianship/archives management, including the supervision of graduate and undergraduate learners, as well as extracurricular and elective teaching; scholarly activity including commitments to external granting agencies; governance, administrative duties, and other contributions to the School and Lakehead and Laurentian Universities. 3. The assignment of the workload shall be communicated in reasonable detail, in writing, to the Member by June 1 by the immediate supervisor. The time-tabling of the teaching load/library assignment shall be communicated in writing to the Member by July 1 by the immediate supervisor. 4. The composition of the workload of particular Members may vary with their discipline, and will take into account the capabilities of the Members. In assigning teaching duties the immediate supervisor shall also consider the following factors: career stage of the Member, the Member's area of expertise, class size, whether or not the Member has ever taught the material before, whether or not the material or course being taught is newly developed. In the assignment of teaching loads, the immediate supervisor, in consultation with the academic Units, shall consider not only the number of hours taught by a Member, but the type of teaching, as well as administrative and other duties. Members' workloads shall also be subject to the following normal maximum for assigned workload:
Sample 1Sample 2
WORKLOAD FOR TEACHING FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS. The Annual Workload Plan shall be fair and equitable, and developed and assigned after consultation with each Member. To help ensure this goal the Board shall post the assignments concerning all Members in the Unit.
Sample 1

Related to WORKLOAD FOR TEACHING FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • Public Posting of Approved Users’ Research Use Statement The PI agrees that information about themselves and the approved research use will be posted publicly on the dbGaP website. The information includes the PI’s name and Requester, project name, Research Use Statement, and a Non-Technical Summary of the Research Use Statement. In addition, and if applicable, this information may include the Cloud Computing Use Statement and name of the CSP or PCS. Citations of publications resulting from the use of controlled-access datasets obtained through this DAR may also be posted on the dbGaP website.

  • Study Population ‌ Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post enterostomy closure, following enterostomy closure (12-month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 month of overall study duration).

  • Supplier Diversity Seller shall comply with Xxxxx’s Supplier Diversity Program in accordance with Appendix V.

  • Research Independence The Company acknowledges that each Underwriter’s research analysts and research departments, if any, are required to be independent from their respective investment banking divisions and are subject to certain regulations and internal policies, and that such Underwriter’s research analysts may hold and make statements or investment recommendations and/or publish research reports with respect to the Company and/or the offering that differ from the views of its investment bankers. The Company hereby waives and releases, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any claims that the Company may have against such Underwriter with respect to any conflict of interest that may arise from the fact that the views expressed by their independent research analysts and research departments may be different from or inconsistent with the views or advice communicated to the Company by such Underwriter’s investment banking divisions. The Company acknowledges that the Representative is a full service securities firm and as such from time to time, subject to applicable securities laws, may effect transactions for its own account or the account of its customers and hold long or short position in debt or equity securities of the Company.

  • Procedures for Providing NP Through Full NXX Code Migration Where a Party has activated an entire NXX for a single Customer, or activated at least eighty percent (80%) of an NXX for a single Customer, with the remaining numbers in that NXX either reserved for future use by that Customer or otherwise unused, if such Customer chooses to receive Telephone Exchange Service from the other Party, the first Party shall cooperate with the second Party to have the entire NXX reassigned in the LERG (and associated industry databases, routing tables, etc.) to an End Office operated by the second Party. Such transfer will be accomplished with appropriate coordination between the Parties and subject to appropriate industry lead times for movements of NXXs from one switch to another. Neither Party shall charge the other in connection with this coordinated transfer.

  • Proposed Policies and Procedures Regarding New Online Content and Functionality By October 31, 2017, the School will submit to OCR for its review and approval proposed policies and procedures (“the Plan for New Content”) to ensure that all new, newly-added, or modified online content and functionality will be accessible to people with disabilities as measured by conformance to the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set forth above, except where doing so would impose a fundamental alteration or undue burden. a) When fundamental alteration or undue burden defenses apply, the Plan for New Content will require the School to provide equally effective alternative access. The Plan for New Content will require the School, in providing equally effective alternate access, to take any actions that do not result in a fundamental alteration or undue financial and administrative burdens, but nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the same benefits or services as their nondisabled peers. To provide equally effective alternate access, alternates are not required to produce the identical result or level of achievement for persons with and without disabilities, but must afford persons with disabilities equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement, in the most integrated setting appropriate to the person’s needs. b) The Plan for New Content must include sufficient quality assurance procedures, backed by adequate personnel and financial resources, for full implementation. This provision also applies to the School’s online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third-party vendor or by using open sources. c) Within thirty (30) days of receiving OCR’s approval of the Plan for New Content, the School will officially adopt, and fully implement the amended policies and procedures.

  • Research Use The Requester agrees that if access is approved, (1) the PI named in the DAR and (2) those named in the “Senior/Key Person Profile” section of the DAR, including the Information Technology Director and any trainee, employee, or contractor1 working on the proposed research project under the direct oversight of these individuals, shall become Approved Users of the requested dataset(s). Research use will occur solely in connection with the approved research project described in the DAR, which includes a 1-2 paragraph description of the proposed research (i.e., a Research Use Statement). Investigators interested in using Cloud Computing for data storage and analysis must request permission to use Cloud Computing in the DAR and identify the Cloud Service Provider (CSP) or providers and/or Private Cloud System (PCS) that they propose to use. They must also submit a Cloud Computing Use Statement as part of the DAR that describes the type of service and how it will be used to carry out the proposed research as described in the Research Use Statement. If the Approved Users plan to collaborate with investigators outside the Requester, the investigators at each external site must submit an independent DAR using the same project title and Research Use Statement, and if using the cloud, Cloud Computing Use Statement. New uses of these data outside those described in the DAR will require submission of a new DAR; modifications to the research project will require submission of an amendment to this application (e.g., adding or deleting Requester Collaborators from the Requester, adding datasets to an approved project). Access to the requested dataset(s) is granted for a period of one (1) year, with the option to renew access or close-out a project at the end of that year. Submitting Investigator(s), or their collaborators, who provided the data or samples used to generate controlled-access datasets subject to the NIH GDS Policy and who have Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and who meet any other study specific terms of access, are exempt from the limitation on the scope of the research use as defined in the DAR.

  • Your Billing Rights: Keep this Document for Future Use This notice tells you about your rights and our responsibilities under the Fair Credit Billing Act.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!