Year 2000 Review Sample Clauses

Year 2000 Review. (a) To the knowledge of the Company, the Company and the Subsidiaries will not be materially adversely affected by (i) any failure of the Company's and the Subsidiaries computer hardware, software, firmware or embedded chip technology to be Year 2000 Compliant (as defined in Article X); or (ii) the cost and/or disruption to normal activities caused by work to be carried out to ensure such computer hardware, software or embedded chip technology is year 2000 Compliant; provided, however, Section 3.38(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedule lists any computer hardware, software or embedded chip technology that is not year 2000 Compliant. (b) The Company and the Subsidiaries are currently reviewing their information technology ("IT") and non-IT computer systems and programs to determine which are not capable of recognizing the Year 2000 and to verify system readiness for the millennium date (the "Company Year 2000 Review"). The Company Year 2000 review covers all of the Company's and the Subsidiaries' operations and is centrally managed.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Year 2000 Review. The Administrative Agent shall have received and completed the review, with results reasonably satisfactory to the Agents and Lenders, of information confirming that (a) the Borrower and its Subsidiaries are taking all necessary and appropriate steps to ascertain the extent of, and successfully address, business and financial risks facing the Borrower and its Subsidiaries as a result of what is commonly referred to as the "Year 2000 Problem" (i.e., the inability of certain computer applications to recognize correctly and perform date-sensitive functions involving certain dates prior to and after December 31, 1999), including risks resulting from the failure of key vendors and customers of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries to successfully address the Year 2000 Problem, and (b) the Borrower's and its Subsidiaries' material computer applications and those of its key vendors and customers will, on a timely basis, adequately address the Year 2000 Problem in all material respects.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Year 2000 Review. Each of Borrower and Guarantors has reviewed its business and operations and has developed a plan to address on a timely basis the risk that computer applications used by it in performing date sensitive functions and involving dates prior to December 31, 1999 and thereafter might fail to perform such functions properly which failure would reasonably be expected to have a Materially Adverse Effect.
Sample 1
Year 2000 Review. (a) The Company and the Subsidiaries have not been and will not, to the Company's knowledge, be materially adversely affected by (i) any failure of the Company's and the Subsidiaries' computer hardware, software, firmware or embedded chip technology to be Year 2000 Compliant (as defined in Article X); or (ii) the cost and/or disruption to normal activities caused by work to be carried out to ensure such computer hardware, software or embedded chip technology is Year 2000 Compliant. (b) All of the information related to the Company Year 2000 Review disclosed in any of the Company's filings with any Governmental Entity was to the Company's knowledge accurate and complete in all material respects as of the date the filing was made with such Governmental Entity. ARTICLE IIIA
Sample 1
Year 2000 Review. Guarantor has reviewed its business and ---------------- operations and has developed a plan to address on a timely basis the risk that computer applications used by it in performing date sensitive functions and involving dates prior to December 31, 1999 and thereafter might fail to perform such functions properly which failure could reasonably be expected to have a Materially Adverse Effect.
Sample 1
Year 2000 Review. On the basis of a comprehensive review and assessment undertaken by Borrower of Borrower's computer applications and inquiry made of Borrower's material suppliers, vendors and customers Borrower reasonably believes that the "Year 2000 problem" (that is, the risk that computer applications used by any person may be unable to recognize and perform properly date-sensitive functions involving certain dates prior to and any date after December 31, 1999) will not result in a material adverse change in the operations, business, properties, or condition (financial or otherwise) of the Borrower.
Sample 1
Year 2000 Review. Each Borrower and Subsidiary has taken, or will take, in a timely manner, and in all events on or before December 31, 1999, all necessary action to assure that each such Borrower or Subsidiary will be Year 2000 Compliant. As used in this Agreement, "Year 2000 Compliant" shall mean, in regard to any entity, that all software, hardware, firmware, equipment, goods or systems utilized by or material to the business operations or financial condition of such entity, will properly perform date-sensitive functions before, during and after the year 2000. The Bank shall have received, with respect to Eltrax, Nordata and Four Corners, an internally-prepared assessment of Year-2000 risk and a compliance plan, which addresses hardware, software and telecom inventories, customer and vendor communication, vendor preparedness, status of new hardware and software for Borrowers' own critical systems including financial and managerial accounting systems and internal communications, together with a budget and timeline for the installation of any new software or hardware to be acquired in respect of any Year-2000 problem. The Bank shall have received, with respect to Encore, GSS and Five Star, an assessment of Year-2000 risk and a compliance plan prepared by a third-party consultant, which assesses each proprietary software product, associated software tools whether owned or licensed by Encore and their respective hardware platforms and is accompanied by evidence that each such product has been thoroughly tested and found to work properly in an environment which accurately simulates a post-December 31, 1999 environment.
Sample 1
Year 2000 Review. Borrower represents and warrants to the Lender that (a) it and its Subsidiaries have reviewed the effect of the Year 2000 Issue on the computer software, hardware, and firmware systems and equipment containing embedded microchips owned or operated by or for Borrower and its Subsidiaries or used or relied upon in the conduct of their business (including systems and equipment supplied by others or with which such computer systems of Borrower and its Subsidiaries interface) and (b) the costs to Borrower and its Subsidiaries of any reprogramming required as a result of the Year 2000 Issue to permit the proper functioning of such systems and equipment and the proper processing of data, and the testing of such reprogramming, and of the reasonably foreseeable consequences of the Year 2000 Issue to Borrower or any of its subsidiaries (including reprogramming errors and the failure of systems or equipment supplied by others), are not reasonably expected to result in a Default or Event of Default or to have a material adverse effect on the business, assets, operations, prospects, or condition (financial or otherwise) of Borrower or its Subsidiaries.
Sample 1

Related to Year 2000 Review

  • Year 2000 The Borrower has made a full and complete assessment of the Year 2000 Issues and has a realistic and achievable program for remediating the Year 2000 Issues on a timely basis (the "Year 2000 Program"). Based on such assessment and on the Year 2000 Program the Borrower does not reasonably anticipate that Year 2000 Issues will have a Material Adverse Effect.

  • Year 2000 Problem The Company and its Subsidiaries have reviewed the areas within their business and operations which could be adversely affected by, and have developed or are developing a program to address on a timely basis, the "Year 2000 Problem" (that is, the risk that computer applications used by the Company and its Subsidiaries may be unable to recognize and perform properly date-sensitive functions involving certain dates prior to and any date after December 31, 1999). Based on such review and program, the Company reasonably believes that the "Year 2000 Problem" will not have a Material Adverse Effect.

  • Year 2000 Compliant The Administrator warrants that all software code owned or under control by it, used in the performance of its obligations hereunder will be Year 2000 Compliant. For purposes of this paragraph, "Year 2000 Compliant" means that the software will continue to operate beyond December 31, 1999 without creating any logical or mathematical inconsistencies concerning any date after December 31, 1999 and without decreasing the functionality of the system applicable to dates prior to January 1, 2000 including, but not limited to, making changes to (a) date and data century recognition; (b) calculations which accommodate same- and multi- century formulas and date values; and (c) input/output of date values which reflect century dates. All changes described in this paragraph will be made at no additional cost to the Fund.

  • Year 2000 Issues Each of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries has made a full and complete assessment of the Year 2000 Issues and has a realistic and achievable program for remediating the Year 2000 Issues on a timely basis. Based on such assessment and program, the Borrower does not reasonably anticipate that Year 2000 Issues will have a Material Adverse Effect.

  • Year 2000 Compliance Each Party warrants that it has implemented a program the goal of which is to ensure that all software, hardware and related materials (collectively called “Systems”) delivered, connected with BellSouth or supplied in the furtherance of the terms and conditions specified in this Agreement: (i) will record, store, process and display calendar dates falling on or after January 1, 2000, in the same manner, and with the same functionality as such software records, stores, processes and calendar dates falling on or before December 31, 1999; and (ii) shall include without limitation date data century recognition, calculations that accommodate same century and multicentury formulas and date values, and date data interface values that reflect the century.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Post Review With respect to each contract not governed by paragraph 2 of this Part, the procedures set forth in paragraph 4 of Appendix 1 to the Guidelines shall apply.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Utilization Review NOTE: The Utilization Review process does not apply to Services that are not covered by Blue Shield because of a coverage determination made by Medicare. State law requires that health plans disclose to Subscribers and health plan providers the process used to authorize or deny health care services un- der the plan. Blue Shield has completed documen- tation of this process ("Utilization Review"), as required under Section 1363.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. To request a copy of the document describing this Utilization Review pro- cess, call the Customer Service Department at the telephone number indicated on your Identification Card.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.