Review and Assessment. Review previous survey results and conduct an inspection of the facilities in order to collect the required number of samples of suspect material. Determine the extent, condition, and approximate quantities of lead and asbestos containing materials.
Review and Assessment. The Program and possible changes and / or variations of this Agreement will be assessed annually.
Review and Assessment. The City and TransLink will work jointly and cooperatively to review and assess over time the structure of the Monitoring Committee and the overall monitoring process set out in this SPA. Any changes to be made to the Monitoring Committee or the overall monitoring process herein stated must have the agreement of both the representatives of TransLink and the City on the Monitoring Committee. For clarity, the opportunity for review set out in the preceding paragraph is based on the recognition of expected changes over time related to data availability, organizational structures, project planning and implementation, and other factors not necessarily known to the Parties at the outset of this SPA. In addition, it may be appropriate to reduce over time the frequency of the meetings of the Monitoring Committee or delivery of Performance Reports.
Review and Assessment. 1. Following the receipt of each progress report submitted to them by the Air Quality Committee in accordance with Article VIII and the views presented to the International Joint Commission on that report in accordance with Article IX, the Parties shall consult on the contents of the progress report, including any recommendations therein.
2. The Parties shall conduct a comprehensive review and assessment of this Agreement, and its implementation, during the fifth year after its entry into force and every five years thereafter, unless otherwise agreed.
3. Following the consultations referred to in paragraph 1, as well as the review and assessment referred to in paragraph 2, the Parties shall consider such action as may be appropriate, including:
1. the modification of this Agreement;
2. the modification of existing policies, programs or measures.
Review and Assessment. 4.1 The ITO shall have final review and assessment of all plans. If the ITO cannot approve a plan after regional coordination, then the ITO will return the plan to LG&E/KU for further development as appropriate. The process for final approval
4.2 The ITO will post LG&E/KU’s finalized Annual Plan on OASIS.
Review and Assessment. By June 27, 2014, the District will complete a review and assessment of access to and enrollment in its AP, Honors, Running Start, and SNHU Dual Credit courses (collectively identified hereinafter as “higher level learning opportunities”) as part of its ongoing efforts to provide all students with equal access to and equal opportunity to participate in the District’s higher level learning opportunities. This review will carefully assess the underrepresentation of black, Hispanic and ELL students (collectively identified hereinafter as “underrepresented groups”) in higher level learning opportunities. The information gathered in this review will be used to identify the root cause(s) of the disparity in enrollment of underrepresented groups in higher level learning opportunities. Information gathered in the review will form the basis for a plan described in Item 3 below, to implement strategies described in Item 2 below, that will increase student participation in its higher level learning opportunities with a particular focus on students from the underrepresented groups. The District may form a committee or hire a consultant or engage another assessor(s) to conduct the review and assessment and make recommendations. The District will provide any committee, consultant, or other assessor(s) with all information identified by the assessor(s) as necessary to engage in the review and assessment. The District will additionally ensure that the committee or consultant or other assessor(s) have expertise in addressing the underrepresentation of students from the underrepresented groups in higher level learning opportunities. At a minimum, the District and/or the committee or consultant or other assessor(s) will:
a) review the District’s enrollment data relating to higher level learning opportunities at the high school beginning in 2008-2009, to the present, including trend data, specifically considering:
i. rates of participation among students in underrepresented groups in higher level learning opportunities, by race, national origin, and ELL status, compared to their representation in the student body as a whole; and
ii. the relationship, if any, between elementary and middle school performance and enrollment in higher level learning opportunities in high school, including the correlation, if any, between the levels assigned to students upon entrance to high school and their prior academic preparation and performance .
b) review and assess the efficacy of publicit...
Review and Assessment a. By January 15, 2017, the District, in consultation with the NEP and the Equity Consultant, will complete a review and assessment (“Review and Assessment”) of its advanced coursework and programming options, including current referral and eligibility criteria for these programs. The District may use existing systems, initiatives, and analyses to satisfy the requirements of this section. At a minimum, the Review and Assessment will:
i. review the District’s enrollment data in its advanced coursework and programming options, to determine the extent to which African-American and Hispanic students continue to be identified and selected at lower rates compared to their representation in the enrollment of their respective schools;
ii. review the District’s enrollment data in its advanced coursework and programming options, including trend data, specifically considering the relationship between foundation course1 enrollments and advanced coursework and programming options;
iii. review whether foundational courses, including but not limited to Algebra I, are consistent across schools;
iv. review the District’s enrollment data and recruitment practices for the Advancement via Individual Determination Program (AVID), including trend data, specifically considering the relationship between participation in AVID and enrollment in advanced coursework and programming options at the high school level, including honors and AP courses;
v. review consistency among schools in documenting advanced coursework and programming referrals, selection, and interventions, including through data systems such as OASYS as well as digitized “jot forms” and other selection tools provided to teachers;
vi. review the efficacy of data collection systems, such as OASYS, in addressing racial disparities in advanced coursework and programming selection, referrals, and participation;
vii. review student participation in Teens of Promise (TOPS), and the effect that out- of-school programming, including career exploration, mentoring, and internships, has on participation and success in advanced coursework and programming options at the middle-and high-school levels;
viii. review and assess referral, eligibility and selection criteria for enrollment in the District’s advanced coursework and programming options; 1 For the purposes of this Agreement, foundation courses shall include, but not be limited to, any elective class at the middle or high school that assists students in succeeding in courses...
Review and Assessment. 1. The University will complete a review of all facilities used by all female and male intercollegiate athletic teams at the University, including any facilities not owned by the University. The review will, at a minimum, include the following: (1) condition and availability of facilities; (2) exclusivity of use of facilities provided for practice and competitive events; (3) availability of locker rooms; (4) quality of locker rooms; (5) maintenance of facilities; (6) preparation of facilities for practice and competitive events; and (7) proximity of facilities that are located off campus. In conducting this review, the University will obtain information from a variety of sources, including the coaches of each team, student athletes, and other knowledgeable individuals.
2. The University will review its recruiting practices for male and female athletes, including funding, travel, advertisement, staff resources, and any other aspects of athletic recruitment for the past two academic years. The review should be disaggregated by athletic team and student athlete.
3. Based on these reviews, the University will submit to OCR an assessment, as to whether: 1) the University believes the facilities provide equivalent benefits and treatment to both sexes participating in its intercollegiate athletic programs or if any modifications or improvements are needed to ensure equivalent treatment between male and female athletic teams; and, 2) if the University believes it provides equitable recruitment practices for student athletes, or if the University believes that improvements could be made to ensure equivalent treatment regarding recruitment for both male and female student athletes.
Review and Assessment. 1. The university will complete a review of all current athletic department coaches for the university’s male and female intercollegiate athletic teams. The review will include the: (a) quantity of coaches assigned to each team, (b) full time (FT) or part time (PT) status for each coach, (c) secondary duties assigned to each coach, whether a coach is responsible for the secondary duties during their team’s regular season, and the percentage of time spent on secondary duties versus coaching duties, (d) qualifications and years of coaching experience for each coach, (e) the salary, benefits, and other forms of compensation for each coach, including both FT and PT coaches, (f) an explanation if there are any differences in salary, benefits, and other forms of compensation between coaches of the same or similar sport; and (g) any other information the university deems necessary to evaluate its agreement to provide equivalent benefits and treatment to members of both sexes participating in its intercollegiate athletic programs.
2. Based on this review, the university will submit to OCR an assessment as to whether the university believes its assignment and compensation of coaches provides equivalent benefits and treatment to both sexes participating in its intercollegiate athletic programs.
Review and Assessment. 1. The university will complete a review of all locker rooms, and practice and competitive facilities (facilities) used by all female and male intercollegiate athletic teams at the university, including any facilities not owned by the university. The review will, at a minimum, include the: (1) quality and availability of facilities; (2) exclusivity of use of facilities provided for practice and competitive events; (3) availability of locker rooms; (4) quality of locker rooms;
