Permits; Compliance with Law Sample Clauses

Permits; Compliance with Law. (a) The Company and each Company Subsidiary holds all material authorizations, permits, certificates, exemptions, approvals, orders, consents, franchises, variances, exemptions and registrations of any Governmental Entity (the “Company Permits”) necessary for the operation of the Business. The Company and each Company Subsidiary is in compliance with the terms of the Company Permits, except where the failure to be in compliance with any Company Permits, individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. No suspension, modification, revocation or cancellation of any of the Company Permits is pending. (b) Since May 31, 2009, (i) neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has been in conflict with, default under or violation of, or has been investigated for, or charged by any Governmental Entity with a violation of, any Law applicable to the Company or any Company Subsidiary or by which any property or asset of the Company or any Company Subsidiary is or was bound, except for any conflicts, defaults, violations, investigations or charges that, individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect and (ii) no investigation or review by any Governmental Entity with respect to the Company or any Company Subsidiary has been pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened, except for such investigations or reviews, the outcomes of which if determined adversely to the Company or any Company Subsidiary, individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has received any notice or communication of any material noncompliance with any such Laws that has not been cured as of the date hereof. (c) None of the Company, the Company Subsidiaries or any of their Representatives has directly or indirectly offered, paid or accepted any remuneration or other thing of value that is prohibited by applicable Law, including under the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977. None of the Company, the Company Subsidiaries or any of their Representatives has directly or indirectly made or agreed to make any contribution, gift, bribe, rebate, payoff, influence payment, kickback or similar payment to any Person, including (i) to obtain favorable treatment in securing business, (ii) to pay for favorable treatment for business secured, (iii) to obtain...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Permits; Compliance with Law. (a) Except for the authorizations, licenses, permits, certificates, approvals, variances, exemptions, orders, franchises, certifications and clearances that are the subject of Section 5.11, which are addressed solely in that Section, CMFT and each CMFT Subsidiary is in possession of all Permits necessary for CMFT and each CMFT Subsidiary to own, lease and, to the extent applicable, operate its properties or to carry on its respective business substantially as they are being conducted as of the date hereof (the “CMFT Permits”), and all such CMFT Permits are valid and in full force and effect, except where the failure to be in possession of, or the failure to be valid or in full force and effect of, any of the CMFT Permits, individually, or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a CMFT Material Adverse Effect. CMFT has paid all fees and assessments due and payable, in each case, in connection with all such Permits except where failure to pay would not have a CMFT Material Adverse Effect. No event has occurred with respect to any of the CMFT Permits which permits, or after notice or lapse of time or both would permit, revocation or termination thereof or would result in any other material impairment of the rights of the holder of any such CMFT Permits. Neither CMFT nor any of the CMFT Subsidiaries has received any notice indicating, nor to the Knowledge of CMFT, is there any pending applicable petition, objection or other pleading with any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction or authority over the operations of CMFT or the CMFT Subsidiaries or the CMFT Properties that impairs the validity of any CMFT Permit or which would reasonably be expected, if accepted or granted, to result in the revocation of any CMFT Permit, except where the impairment or revocation of any such CMFT Permits, individually, or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a CMFT Material Adverse Effect. (b) Since January 1, 2018, neither CMFT nor any CMFT Subsidiary has been in conflict with, or in default or violation of, any Law applicable to CMFT or any CMFT Subsidiary or by which any property or asset of CMFT or any CMFT Subsidiary is bound, (except for compliance with Laws addressed in Section 5.11 and Section 5.13, respectively, which are solely addressed in those Sections), except for any such conflicts, defaults or violations that, individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a CMFT Material Adverse Effect.
Permits; Compliance with Law. Unless otherwise stated on the face of the Contract, Seller shall procure all permits and licenses and abide by all applicable laws, regulations, and ordinances in the locale where the Services are performed.
Permits; Compliance with Law. The Company and each of its Subsidiaries is in possession of all authorizations, licenses, permits, certificates, approvals and clearances of any Governmental Entity necessary for the Company and each of its Subsidiaries to own, lease and operate its properties or to carry on its respective businesses substantially in the manner described in the Company SEC Filings filed prior to the date hereof and substantially as it is being conducted as of the date hereof (the “Company Permits”), and all such Company Permits are valid, and in full force and effect, except where the failure to have, or the suspension or cancellation of, or failure to be valid or in full force and effect of, any of the Company Permits would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect. None of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is in conflict with, or in default or violation of, (a) any Law applicable to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or by which any property or asset of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is bound or affected or (b) any Company Permits, except in each case for any such conflicts, defaults or violations that would not, individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect.
Permits; Compliance with Law. (a) Except for the authorizations, licenses, permits, certificates, approvals, variances, exemptions, orders, franchises, certifications and clearances that are the subject of Section 4.14, which are addressed solely in that Section, the Company and each Company Subsidiary is in possession of all authorizations, licenses, permits, certificates, approvals, variances, exemptions, orders, franchises, certifications and clearances of any Governmental Authority and accreditation and certification agencies, bodies or other organizations, including building permits and certificates of occupancy, necessary for the Company and each Company Subsidiary to own, lease and, to the extent applicable, operate its properties or to carry on its respective business substantially as it is being conducted as of the date hereof (the “Company Permits”), and all such Company Permits are valid and in full force and effect, except where the failure to be in possession of, or the failure to be valid or in full force and effect of, any of the Company Permits, individually or in the aggregate, has not had and would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary has received any claim or notice nor has any Knowledge indicating that the Company or any Company Subsidiary is currently not in compliance with the terms of any such Company Permits, except where the failure to be in compliance with the terms of any such Company Permits, individually or in the aggregate, have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. (b) Neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary is or has, since January 1, 2013, been in conflict with, or in default or violation of (i) any Law applicable to the Company or any Company Subsidiary or by which any property or asset of the Company or any Company Subsidiary is bound (except for Laws addressed in Section 4.10, Section 4.11, Section 4.14, Section 4.15 or Section 4.17, which are the subject of the representations and warranties made therein), or (ii) any Company Permits (except for the Company Permits addressed in Section 4.14, which are the subject of the representations and warranties made therein), except in each case for any such conflicts, defaults or violations that, individually or in the aggregate, have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. (c) Since January 1, 2013, none of the Company, any Co...
Permits; Compliance with Law. Each of the Company and the Company Subsidiaries is in possession of all authorizations, licenses, permits, certificates, approvals and clearances, and has submitted notices to, all Governmental Entities (including all authorizations under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, as amended (the “FDCA”), and the regulations of the United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) promulgated thereunder) necessary for the Company or any such Company Subsidiary to own, lease and operate its properties or other assets and to carry on its respective business in substantially the manner described in the Company SEC Filings filed prior to the date hereof and as it is being conducted as of the date hereof (the “Company Permits”), and all such Company Permits are valid, and in full force and effect, except where the failure to have, or the suspension or cancellation of, or failure to be valid or in full force and effect of, any of the Company Permits would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect. Neither the Company nor any Company Subsidiary is in conflict with, or in default or violation of, (i) any Law applicable to the Company or any Company Subsidiary or by which any property or asset of the Company or any Company Subsidiary is bound or affected or (ii) any Company Permits, except, with respect to clauses (i) and (ii), for any such conflicts, defaults or violations that would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Permits; Compliance with Law. Unless otherwise stated on the face of the Contract, Consultant shall procure all permits and licenses and abide by all applicable laws, regulations, and ordinances in the locale where the Services are performed.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Permits; Compliance with Law. 31 Section 4.7 SEC Filings; Financial Statements..................31 Section 4.8 Disclosure Documents...............................33 Section 4.9 Absence of Certain Changes or Events...............34 Section 4.10
Permits; Compliance with Law. (a) Except for the authorizations, licenses, permits, certificates, approvals, variances, exemptions, orders, franchises, certifications and clearances that are the subject of Section 4.11, which are addressed solely in that Section, CCIT III and each CCIT III Subsidiary is in possession of all authorizations, licenses, permits, certificates, approvals, variances, exemptions, orders, franchises, certifications and clearances of any Governmental Authority (“Permits”) necessary for CCIT III and each CCIT III Subsidiary to own, lease and, to the extent applicable, operate its properties or to carry on its respective business substantially as they are being conducted as of the date hereof (the “CCIT III Permits”), and all such CCIT III Permits are valid and in full force and effect, except where the failure to be in possession of, or the failure to be valid or in full force and effect of, any of the CCIT III Permits, individually, or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a CCIT III Material Adverse Effect. CCIT III has paid all fees and assessments due and payable, in each case, in connection with all such Permits except where failure to pay, individually or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a CCIT III Material Adverse Effect. No event has occurred with respect to any of the CCIT III Permits which permits, or after notice or lapse of time or both would permit, revocation or termination thereof or would result in any other material impairment of the rights of the holder of any such CCIT III Permits. Neither CCIT III nor any of the CCIT III Subsidiaries has received any notice indicating, nor to the Knowledge of CCIT III, is there any pending applicable petition, objection or other pleading with any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction or authority over the operations of CCIT III or the CCIT III Subsidiaries or the CCIT III Properties that impairs the validity of any CCIT III Permit or which would reasonably be expected, if accepted or granted, to result in the revocation of any CCIT III Permit, except where the impairment or revocation of any such CCIT III Permits, individually, or in the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a CCIT III Material Adverse Effect. (b) Since January 1, 2018, neither CCIT III nor any CCIT III Subsidiary has been in conflict with, or in default or violation of, (i) any Law applicable to CCIT III or any CCIT III Subsidiary or by which any property or asset of CCIT III o...
Permits; Compliance with Law. (a) The Company ---------------------------- and the Banks have all permits, licenses, approvals, authorizations and registrations under all federal, state, local and foreign laws required for them to carry on their respective businesses as presently conducted, and all of such permits, licenses, approvals, authorizations and registrations are in full force and effect, and no suspension or cancellation of any of them is pending or, to the knowledge of Management, threatened. (b) The Company and the Banks have complied with all laws, regulations, and orders applicable to them or their businesses. Section 4.3.2(b) of the Company Disclosure Memorandum contains a list of any known violations of such laws, regulations, ordinances or rules by any present officer, director, or employee of the Company or either of the Banks which occurred since December 31, 1992, and which resulted in any order, proceeding, judgment or decree which would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 401(d) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission if the Company or either of the Banks had been subject to the reporting requirements under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. No past violation of any such law, regulation, ordinance or rule has occurred which could impair the right or ability of the Company or the Banks to conduct their businesses. (c) Except as set forth in Section 4.3.2(c) of the Company Disclosure Memorandum, no notice or warning from any governmental authority with respect to any failure or alleged failure of the Company or either of the Banks to comply in any respect with any law, regulation or order has been received, nor is any such notice or warning proposed or, to the knowledge of Management, threatened.
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!