Research Question 2 definition

Research Question 2. What is the effect of a guided inductive and a deductive presentational approach on intermediate-level college French students’ accurate use of the target structures in a delayed writing task? Mean percentage scores and standard deviations in each condition for students present for all eight writing activities are presented in Table 10. The results of a paired samples t test indicated no statistically significant difference between conditions, t(13) = - 0.48, p =. 634, d = .09. Mean percentage scores and standard deviations in each condition for students present for three or more writing activities in each condition are presented in Table 11. The results of a paired samples t test indicated no statistically significant difference between conditions, t(21) = - 0.09, p = .925, d = .01. Power for these analyses was .06 and .05, reflecting small effect sizes and a low number of participants in the sample. To explore the relationship between students’ performance on the immediate grammar tests and their performance on the delayed writing activity, Xxxxxxx product moment correlations were computed between their immediate grammar tests and writing tasks raw scores. Table 12 presents the means and standard deviations of the immediate grammar tests, writing tasks, and the correlation coefficients. The results indicated that there was a positive correlation between performance on the immediate grammar tests and the writing activities for seven of the eight grammatical structures. Three were statistically significant. Although not statistically significant, a number of these correlations were substantial. Xxxxx (1988) indicated that the significance of a correlation coefficient is affected by sample size. In addition, he suggested definitions for small, medium, and large effect sizes as correlation coefficients of .10, .30, and .50, respectively. With the exception of the fourth structure that yielded a negative correlation, all other non-significant correlations can be considered of medium effect size. The descriptive statistics indicate that the means for the writing tasks were generally lower than the mean scores for the immediate grammar tests. Participants performed better in the controlled production grammar test than they did in the more spontaneous and communicative open-ended writing task. The negative correlation between the immediate test and the writing performance for structure 4 illustrated the higher difficulty for participants to use the target struct...
Sample 1
Research Question 2. What is the effect of the duration of antiretroviral therapy on pregnancy incidence among HIV-infected women in Zambia, Malawi, Tanzania, and Eswatini? initiation among HIV-positive women in Zambia, Malawi, Tanzania, and Eswatini. of antiretroviral therapy among HIV-positive women in Zambia, Malawi, Tanzania, and Eswatini.
Sample 1
Research Question 2. Is the correlation between different informants’ ratings of anxiety, depression, or broad internalizing in youth with ASD moderated by the general cognitive ability of the youth? There is not enough evidence, based on prior studies or theory, to develop a specific hypothesis related to parent-teacher agreement in this context; however, hypotheses have been generated for youth-parent and youth-teacher agreement. • Hypothesis 2a: The correlation between youth self-report ratings and parent ratings of anxiety, depression, or broad internalizing in youth with ASD will be moderated by the general cognitive ability of the youth, such that more advanced cognitive ability will be associated with better youth-parent agreement. In an observational study, Xxx et al. (2016) found better agreement between parents and youth with ASD in reporting anxiety symptoms was associated with higher youth verbal IQ. Similarly, Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx et al. (2011) determined that, in an ASD sample, higher youth-parent agreement was associated with higher verbal IQ and more advanced metacognitive skills. In another observational study with an ASD sample, youth-parent agreement was better for youth with higher IQs (Kaat & Lecavalier, 2015). In contrast, a meta-analysis by Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxxx (2015) found an inverse relationship between IQ and inter-rater agreement across raters for broad internalizing. However, this meta-analysis combined studies of youth with ASD with studies of non-ASD youth with ID— and it is not clear how the resulting heterogeneity may have impacted the findings. This finding appears to be an anomaly and may be an artifact that arose from the different samples involved. Otherwise, in general, across broad samples of youth, the literature supports higher agreement between youth self-report and other measures of behavior occur when children have higher verbal or higher general cognitive ability (Xxxxxx, 2010; Xxxx et al., 2016).
Sample 1

Examples of Research Question 2 in a sentence

  • Initiatives to manage and alleviate the conflict (refer Research Question 3) are closely associated with antecedents of interorganisational conflict (refer Research Question 2).

  • The second research question fosters the derivation of a set of typical functionalities required in compliance mon-itoring approaches and practice(↦ Research Question 2 (RQ2): What are functionalities that are essential for compliance monitoring approaches in business processes?).RQ2 meets the challenge of granularity and coverage.

  • Research Question 2: What are some stresses associated with fostering and what coping mechanisms do sons and daughters use to deal with them?This research question is partly exploratory, since it has not been asked directly in the literature before.

  • It then explores peer reviewed literature relating to other national government e-health strategies to identify factors affecting the adoption of other national government e-Health strategies in order to address Research Question 2.

  • Research Question 2: The second question addresses the potential added value that respondents perceive in using competence instruments.

  • Summary of the Study 65 Summary of the Findings 66 Research Question 1 67 Research Question 2 67 Research Question 3 68 Research Question 4 69 Research Question 5 69 Discussion 69 Limitations 72 Conclusions 72 Recommendations for Practice 73 Recommendations for Further Research 74 Reflections 75 REFERENCES 76 APPENDICES 81 Appendix A: Institutional Review Board Certificate.

  • In addition, the comparatively lower SD values of these two statements also indicate the responses among students are almost unanimous.The results of statements relating to integrative orientation towards English (part of Research Question 2) are illustrated in Table 4.

  • A correlational analysis was also conducted to determine the strength and direction of the relationship between the presence of a CRO and the stage of ERM implementation.For Research Question 2, a regression analysis was conducted to examine the extent to which the presence of an Audit Committee (AC) influenced the implementation of ERM.

  • Summary of Results for Research Question 2 Four of the parents in the study reported that they had been aware that some significant piece of information was about to be shared with them prior to the actual disclosure.

  • Research Question #2: Overall, test results indicated that ending third year teacher's ability to un- derstand basic classroom management models, methods, and techniques was not signi cantly statistically di erent when compared to end of rst year teacher ability.


More Definitions of Research Question 2

Research Question 2. Using Conditional Inference Trees, can latrine spot-check data be used to determine statistically significant differences in continuous distributions of respondent-reported or PLUM-recorded ‘likely defecation events’? H02: None of the 15 independent latrine spot-check variables will provide a significant partition at alpha: 0.05 after using Bonferroni correction for multiple tests of significance. H12: CIT will identify at least one out of the 15 independent latrine spot-check variables as significant (P-value < 0.05) after using Bonferroni correction in differentiating continuous distributions of respondent-reported or PLUM-recorded ‘likely defecation events’.
Sample 1
Research Question 2. What are the complexities PWE encounter in using or accessing smartphone technology? Research Question 3: What are PWE’s current epilepsy SM practices and how do they prefer to receive information on treatment and SM techniques?
Sample 1
Research Question 2. Is the implementation of the NBS Card associated with reported prevalence of referrals for hearing loss in GA? Sub Question: Is the level of unit providing the results associated with reports of hearing loss screening?
Sample 1
Research Question 2. How do the different delivery modalities of Hyflex courses and Traditional courses impact student satisfaction toward content and delivery?” The following Likert satisfaction survey questions were examined to determine if program/delivery modality has an impact on student satisfaction toward content and delivery:
Sample 1
Research Question 2. Is there a difference in grade point average based on online or face-to-face degree completion method? Null Hypothesis 2: There is no significant difference in grade point average for online and face to face articulation participants. Because the dependent variable is a continuous variable, a t-test of independent samples was used to compare the mean final GPA for online students and face-to-face students. There is no significant difference in the scores for online students (M=3.23, SD=0.561) and face-to-face students (M=3.18, SD=0.496); t(101.9)= 0.514, p=0.608 (see Table 3). These results indicate that there is not a significant difference in the mean final GPA based on students’ program format; online students and face-to-face students to do not differ in their final GPAs. Group n M SD t p= Online 115 3.23 .561 Face-to-Face 49 3.18 .496
Sample 1
Research Question 2. Is there currently any knowledge and awareness of racism as it pertains to public health among MPH students?
Sample 1

Related to Research Question 2

  • Research Use shall have the meaning given in Section 2.2.2 of this Agreement.

  • Collaboration Product means a pharmaceutical product containing or comprising Compound in any dosage form alone, or in combination with, one or more other pharmaceutically active ingredients, and any and all Improvements thereto.

  • Clinical Study means a Phase I Study, Phase II Study, Phase III Study, as applicable.

  • Collaboration Know-How means all Know-How conceived, discovered, developed or otherwise made by or on behalf of a particular Party or any of its Affiliates or permitted subcontractors of any of the foregoing (solely or jointly by or on behalf of a particular Party or any of its Affiliates or permitted subcontractors of any of the foregoing) in the course of [***].

  • Commercialized shall have corresponding meanings.

  • Research Plan shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1.

  • New Products means any product which is not an Enhanced Product or 2 Existing Product but which is substantially similar to an Existing Product with respect to design and function and possesses reasonable performance improvements. If Company desires to purchase an Enhanced or New Product(s) from Supplier, Company shall so notify Supplier and provide Supplier the opportunity to manufacture such Enhanced or New Product(s), subject to the following conditions and procedures.

  • Research Data means documents in a digital form, other than scientific publications, which are collected or produced in the course of scientific research activities and are used as evidence in the research process, or are commonly accepted in the research community as necessary to validate research findings and results;

  • Clinical Trials means a controlled study in humans of the safety or efficacy of a Product, and includes, without limitation, such clinical trials as are designed to support expanded labeling or to satisfy the requirements of an Agency in connection with any Product Approval and any other human study used in research and Development of a Product.

  • New Product means the Synology-branded hardware product and Synology-branded accessories contained in the original packaging Customer bought from an authorized Synology distributor or reseller. You may see our “New Product” at Product Support Status.

  • Collaboration Target means the Initial Collaboration Targets set forth on Exhibit F and any Additional Target or Substitute Target that is selected in accordance with Section 3.3 of this Agreement.

  • Commercial Software means Software developed or regularly used that: (i) has been sold, leased, or licensed to the general public; (ii) has been offered for sale, lease, or license to the general public; (iii) has not been offered, sold, leased, or licensed to the public but will be available for commercial sale, lease, or license in time to satisfy the delivery requirements of this Contract; or (iv) satisfies a criterion expressed in (i), (ii), or (iii) above and would require only minor modifications to meet the requirements of this Contract.

  • Research Program has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.

  • Development Schedule shall have the meaning set forth in Section 1.1.

  • Additional SDU Study means a deliverability study that a Developer may elect to pursue as that term is defined in OATT Section 25 (OATT Attachment S). For purposes of Section 23.4.5 of this Attachment H, “Affiliated Entity” shall mean, with respect to a person or Entity:

  • Development Plan has the meaning set forth in Section 3.2.

  • Research Results means any technical result acquired based on the Collaborative Research, including, but not limited to, any invention, idea, design, copyrightable work and know-how which relates to the purpose of the Collaborative Research.

  • Commercialization or “Commercialize” means activities directed to marketing, promoting, research and development as required, manufacturing for sale, offering for sale, distributing, importing or selling a product, including sub-licensing or sub-contracting of these activities.

  • Development Application means the development application identified in Item 5 of Schedule 1 and includes all plans, reports models, photomontages, material boards (as amended supplemented) submitted to the consent authority before the determination of that Development Application.

  • Collaboration has the meaning set forth in Section 2.1.

  • Non-Microsoft Product means any third-party-branded software, data, service, website or product, unless incorporated by Microsoft in a Product.

  • Clinical Studies means human clinical trials for a Licensed Product and any other tests and studies for a Licensed Product in human subjects.

  • Development Program means the implementation of the development plan.

  • Program Materials means the documents and information provided by the Program Administrator specifying the qualifying EEMs, technology requirements, costs and other Program requirements, which include, without limitation, program guidelines and requirements, application forms and approval letters.

  • Additional Product means any Product identified as such in the Product Terms and chosen by Enrolled Affiliate under this Enrollment.

  • Software Product means any COTS which you propose to provide pursuant to the contract.