Test 4 definition

Test 4. Six or more values are consecutively increasing or consecutively decreasing. Therefore, Test 1 is designed to detect a short term change or jump in the average level. Tests 2 and 4 are looking for long term changes. Test 2 will detect a shift up in averages or a shift to a lower level. Test 4 is designed to detect either a trend of continuous increase in the average values or continuous decrease. Test 3 is designed to assess changes in performance during an intermediate period of three years. If Test 3 is satisfied, the evidence is of a decline (or increase) in Availability over a three year period. Together the four tests allow the ISO to monitor the availability performance of a Voltage Class for a PTO. If none of these tests indicates that a change has occurred, performance shall be considered to be stable and consistent with past performance. If one or more of these tests indicates a change then Availability performance shall be considered as having improved or degraded relative to the performance defined by the control chart. Table

Test 4. Six or more values are consecutively increasing or consecutively decreasing. Therefore, Test 1 is designed to detect a short-term change or jump in the average level. Tests 2 and 4 are looking for long-term changes. Test 2 will detect a shift up in averages or a shift to a lower level. Test 4 is designed to detect either a trend of continuous increase in the average values or continuous decrease. Test 3 is designed to assess changes in performance during an intermediate period of three calendar years. If Test 3 is satisfied, the evidence is of a decline (or increase) in Availability over a three calendar year period. Together the four tests allow the CAISO to monitor the Availability performance of a Voltage Class for a PTO. If none of these tests indicate that a change has occurred, performance shall be considered to be stable and consistent with past performance. If one or more of these tests indicates a change then Availability performance shall be considered as having improved or degraded relative to the performance defined by the control chart. Table 4.2.1 provides a summary of the performance indications provided by the tests. The control chart limits may be updated annually if the last calendar year’s Availability performance indices did not trigger any of the four tests. If none of the four tests are triggered, the new limits will be constructed including the last calendar year’s data. The control chart limits may be modified each year to reflect the number of Transmission Line Circuits in service during that calendar year if necessary. However, it is suggested that unless the number of Transmission Line Circuits changes by more than 30% from the previous calendar year, the use of the median number of Transmission Line Circuits should continue. Consider an example; suppose after the control chart has been prepared for a Voltage Class, next calendar year’s data arrives with the number of Transmission Line Circuits 30% higher than the median used in the past. New limits will be generated in order to assess the Availability performance for that calendar year. For the special case where only one Transmission Line Circuit has a Forced Outage(IMS) in a Voltage Class during a calendar year, the assessment process for Index 2 is as follows; if Index 2 for this Transmission Line Circuit does not trigger any of the four tests, no further action is necessary. If, however, one or more of the tests are triggered, then limits for this Transmission Line Circuit f...

Test 4. You do things that, considered in their totality, show you are materially and significantly involved in the production of the farm commodities. If a farmer materially participates in the farm operation to which farmland is leased, the rental income is considered farm income, reported through Schedule F. If a farmer does not materially participate in the farm operation to which farmland is leased, the rental income is not considered farm income reported through Schedule F. It is reported elsewhere. Farmers who do not materially participate in the tenant’s operation still need to report rental income received. Generally, non-participating farmland owners who receive rent in the form of crops or livestock will report income and expenses on IRS Form 4835: Farm Rental Income and Expenses. Non-participating farmland owners receiving cash Learn more at xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/xxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx rent for farmland may report it on Schedule E: Supplemental Income and Loss, which is commonly used to report real estate rental income. There are exceptions to these general rules and farmer landlords must do further research to make sure they use the right form. The facts above about farmland rental income and material participation relate to farmland rental income only. Where farmers rent out their buildings, the income is not farm income reported through Schedule F. It is reported elsewhere. If farmer-landlords rent out land containing both farmland and buildings, the farmer-landlord should allocate the rental payment between the value of the land separately as to the buildings. Generally, rental income received from non-farmland is reported on Schedule E: Supplemental Income and Loss. Exceptions to this general rule exist. Determine the tax consequences to non-farming landowners who rent land to farmers. Landowners who receive rental income from farmers for the lease of their farmland must report that income. The procedure will depend on several factors including the overall scope and nature of the landowner’s rental activity. If the landowner is materially participating (see above) in the tenant’s activities, the landowner is considered a farmer and will report the rental income on a Schedule F. If the landowner does not materially participate, then he or she reports the income elsewhere. If the landowner rents property as a matter of course, then he or she may have a separate business for tax purposes and report income on a non-farm business return such a Form 1120, 1120S or ...

Examples of Test 4 in a sentence

• Test 4: For distributed TOEs, Test 1 defined above should be applicable to all TOE components that forward audit data to an external audit server.

• Test 4: If OCSP is selected, the evaluator shall configure the OCSP server or use a man-in-the-middle tool to present a certificate that does not have the OCSP signing purpose and verify that validation of the OCSP response fails.

• Student Name: Signature: ID #: Tuberculosis Test (4) TWO STEP MANTOUX TUBERCULIN SKIN TEST: Documentation of a Two Step test must be submitted.

• Test 4: This test shall be performed for each version of IKE supported.

• Test 4: For distributed TOEs where not all TOE components support the authentication of Security Administrators according to FIA_UIA_EXT.1 and FIA_UAU_EXT.2, the evaluator shall test that the components authenticate Security Administrators as described in the TSS.

• Test 4: The evaluator shall present a server certificate that contains a CN that does not match the reference identifier but does contain an identifier in the SAN that matches.

• Test 4 [conditional]: The evaluator shall present a server certificate that contains a CN that does not match the reference identifier but does contain an identifier in the SAN that matches.

• Test 4: image slices of the gas temperature at coordinate z=0.5 (box units) and time t 0.05 Myr obtained by RADAMESH (top left-hand panel) and by three of the four codes that performed the same tests in I06 (see caption in Fig.

• Test 4: image slices of the H I fraction at coordinate z 0.5 (box units) and time t 0.05 Myr obtained by RADAMESH (top left-hand panel) and by three of the four codes that performed the same tests in I06, in particular CRASH (bottom left-hand panel), C2-RAY (top-right panel) and FTTE (bottom right-hand panel).

• Please refer to Appendix A for the trustee’s acknowledgement and undertaking.