Assessment Process. The role of the Assessment Process is to provide the framework through which a judgement can be made about whether each scheme is robust and has been rigorously assessed against a specific set of criteria to ensure that it achieves value for money. The Candidate Scheme Sponsors will submit a Candidate Scheme Initial Proposal to the Regional Office who will categorise it against the Scheme Prospectus eligibility groupings and refer it to: the appropriate Advisory/Consultation Body with a request to provide observation on the proposed scheme; and the external business case assessor requesting that they undertake an independent review with reference to the impact assessment tool. The Initial Proposal, with the observations and review, will be submitted to the Programme Board who are required to assess all available data and determine if: The case is sufficiently strong for the Candidate Scheme to move onto the next stage; or The scheme is returned to the Candidate Scheme Sponsor with details of where the Initial Proposal is currently not sufficiently strong to allow it to move forward to the next stage. If the scheme is supported to go to the next stage the Candidate Scheme Sponsor will be requested to submit an Outline Business Case which, when received, will be sent to the external business case assessor requesting that they undertake a further review of the additional detail provided. This review will be submitted to the Programme Board who can make the following recommendations to the Regional Cabinet: The scheme does not fall within the Wider Investment Fund scope; The scheme does not provide sufficient regional benefit and should be rejected; The scheme, although not seeking Wider Investment Funding, is supported and should be promoted as it aligns with the overall objectives of the City Deal; The scheme’s Outline Business Case is currently not sufficiently strong and should be returned to the Candidate Scheme Sponsor for further work; or The scheme should move to the next stage. The Regional Cabinet will consider the recommendations and resolve either to accept them or based on the available data agree an alternative course of action. If the Regional Cabinet resolve that the scheme go to the next stage the Candidate Scheme Sponsor will be requested to submit a Full Business Case which, when received, will be sent to the external business case assessor requesting that they undertake a further review of the additional detail provided. T...
Assessment Process. The assessment process comprises three stages and follows a formal request from the employee to have their competence assessed. Normally such a request will not be made more than once in any twelve month period. The process involves:
Assessment Process. 11.1 Where the Panel receives and accepts the referral of a Change Proposal in accordance with Clause 10, it shall ensure that the proposal is subjected to a process of assessment in accordance with this Clause 11 (the Assessment Process).
Assessment Process. Members meeting the minimum qualifications for the position of Corporal shall be afforded the opportunity to participate in the assessment phase of the process. This shall include, but not be limited to the following:
A. Screening Device – Members must successfully complete a written examination for the position of Corporal with a minimum score of seventy-five percent (75%).
Assessment Process. The administrative procedures for the lodgement and processing of the Initial Assessment and ongoing Assessments are set out in Attachment 3.
Assessment Process. 3.1 The industry scheme will need to demonstrate the following: • The assessment process must be underpinned with guidance that deals with the assessment of standards and how non-conformities are dealt with in relation to the risk posed by non-compliance. Guidance should include procedures for dealing with repeat non-conformities,failure to rectify non- conformities and situations when certification should be withheld or suspended and circumstances in which it might be reinstated. In addition the guidance must include verification of corrective action; • The assessment must be carried out by assessors who are impartial, competent and maintain relevant sector knowledge; • Frequency of assessments must be no less than the minimum set by legislation for the sector covered by the assurance scheme, risked based and take into account previous history; • Assessment must review all the standards set by the scheme applicable to the business and as a minimum must include a visual inspection of the site, observation of operations and examination of records; • Comprehensive records of assessment findings should be maintained. (Date, name of assessor, scope of assessment, non-conformities, timescales for rectification etc.); and • Where possible assessments should be unannounced or at short notice.
Assessment Process. 9.1. The PhD candidate must satisfy: • Approved academic training component • Approved written thesis • An approved trial lecture on an assigned topic • Approved public defence
9.2. The thesis is to be submitted to name of institution.
9.3. Name of institution will be coordinating and making the final decisions in the assessment process. Name of institution will be consulted on all decisions regarding the assessment process.
9.4. Name of institution shall appoint an expert assessment committee of at least four members consisting of two internal examiners, one each from UiB and XXX, and two external examiners.
9.5. Rules on impartiality contained in the national legislation of Norway and relevant country apply to the members of the committee. The supervisors can not be members of the expert assessment committee.
9.6. The assessment committee will be responsible for the assessment of the thesis, the trial lecture, and the public defence.
9.7. The assessment committee may, on the basis of the submitted PhD thesis and any additional material, recommend the candidate to make minor revisions to the thesis before the committee submits its final report. A deadline up to but not exceeding three (3) months will be set for completing such revisions.
9.8. If the committee finds that major changes are needed in order to deem the thesis worthy of a public defence, the committee must recommend that the thesis is rejected.
Assessment Process. Beginning January 1, 2006, all Employees covered by this agreement will be given the opportunity to be assessed for proficiency at either the QBS Level 1 or Level 2 designation.
Assessment Process. SELECTION CRITERIA Detailed below are the criteria against which all eligible, compliant applications will be assessed. Fifty per cent of the scoring will be attributed to alignment with one or more of the four goals of the Tasmanian Disaster Resilience Strategy and a focus on risk reduction. The remaining fifty per cent will be attributed to an assessment of the proposed management arrangements for the project. Projects must directly align with at least one of the four goals of the Tasmanian Disaster Resilience Strategy (outlined below) and must have a focus on activities that proactively reduce disaster risk in order to minimise the loss and suffering caused by disasters. The application form provides opportunity for applicants to outline how the project will support these areas of priority.
Assessment Process o An internal document review will be done to ascertain if all clauses of the standard have been covered.
