Access Review Sample Clauses

Access Review. Seller shall give to PRG's officers, employees, counsel, accountants and other representatives including, without limitation, the Auditors (collectively, the "Agents"), free and full access to and the right to inspect, during normal business hours, all of the premises, properties, assets, financial and other records, contracts and other documents relating to the Business and shall permit them to consult with the officers, employees, accountants, counsel and agents of Seller for the purpose of (a) making such investigation of the Business, including, without limitation, the 1997 Balance Sheet, as PRG shall desire to make and (b) reviewing the financial statements and financial and operational condition of Seller, and preparing reviewed financial statements with respect to, each of the fiscal years of Seller in the [three] year period ending on December 31, 1997. Furthermore, Seller shall furnish to PRG and the Agents all such documents and copies of documents and records and information with respect to the affairs of the Business and copies of any working papers relating thereto as PRG or such Agents shall from time to time reasonably request and shall permit PRG and the Agents to make such physical inventories and inspections of the Assets as PRG or such Agents may request from time to time. PRG shall pay at the Closing, the fees, costs and out-of-pocket expenses of the Auditors incurred in connection with the review and the preparation of the reviewed financial statements described in this subsection 4.1.11.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Access Review. Active users with access to the Platform Services are reviewed at least quarterly and are promptly removed upon termination of employment. As part of the personnel offboarding process, all accesses are revoked and data assets are securely wiped.
Sample 1
Access Review. Subject to reasonable notice provided to Cidco in advance, Cidco shall afford to EarthLink and to EarthLink's officers, employees, accountants, counsel and other authorized representatives reasonable access during normal business hours, throughout the period prior to the earlier of the Effective Time or the date of termination of this Agreement, to its offices, properties, facilities, Contracts, commitments, books, and records (including but not limited to Tax Returns) and any report, schedule or other document filed or received pursuant to the requirements of federal or state securities laws, and shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause its representatives to furnish promptly to EarthLink such additional financial and operating data and other information as EarthLink or its duly authorized representatives may from time to time reasonably request.
Sample 1
Access Review. Each of the Targets shall provide to Acquiror, its attorneys, accountants, appraisers and other authorized representatives or retained experts access upon reasonable notice to all the premises, books, records, personnel and income tax returns of or relating to such Target during normal business hours and shall furnish to such persons such financial and operating data and other information as Acquiror or such persons may from time to time reasonably request. In addition, each of the Targets shall authorize its independent certified public accountants to give Acquiror's independent certified public accountants access to books and records and work papers regarding the Target's financial statements. No investigation, test, examination or inquiry by Acquiror shall affect the representations and warranties contained in this Agreement.
Sample 1
Access Review. A formal process shall be conducted at regular intervals by system owners and application owners in conjunction with ISG to confirm that remote users’ access rights remains appropriate. The review shall be documented and sign off by the applicable responsible. Managers are responsible for recertifying on a quarterly basis the list of authorized remote access users.
Sample 1
Access Review. Due Diligence. Compost, Miami and Bedminster 1) will afford and provide to the officers, directors, employees, counsel, agents, investment bankers, accountants, and other professionals and agents and/or representatives of Lionhart, LHI and GEP, open, friendly and full access to the Business, all other business, the assets, the Properties, the Real Estate, and the offices, facilities, properties, books, and legal, financial and business files and records of Compost, Miami and Bedminster, and 2) will cooperate with Lionhart, LHI and GEP, on a commercially reasonable basis with respect to all due diligence questions, investigations or audits conducted or sponsored by or on behalf of Lionhart, LHI and/or GEP, that relate to or arise from Compost, Miami and/or Bedminster.
Sample 1
Access Review. At least annually, AvePoint conducts a review and validation of its systems users’ accounts to ensure the continued need for system access.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Access Review

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Access to Review Materials The Servicer will give the Asset Representations Reviewer access to the Review Materials for all of the Subject Receivables within sixty (60) calendar days after receipt of the review notice in one or more of the following ways in the Servicer’s reasonable discretion: (i) by electronic posting of Review Materials to a password-protected website to which the Asset Representations Reviewer has access, (ii) by providing originals or photocopies of documents relating to the Subject Receivables at one of the properties of the Servicer or (iii) in another manner agreed by the Servicer and the Asset Representations Reviewer. The Servicer may redact or remove PII from the Review Materials so long as all information in the Review Materials necessary for the Asset Representations Reviewer to complete the Asset Review remains intact and unchanged.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Agreement Review If, pursuant to section 25.10 (Review of Agreement) of the Bilateral Agreement, the Bilateral Agreement is reviewed after three or five years, or both, of the effective date of the Bilateral Agreement, and any changes to the Bilateral Agreement are required as a result, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as necessary and in a manner that is consistent with such changes.

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!