Alternative Methods. The parties may mutually agree to by-pass any step or to use alternative methods in settling grievances.
Alternative Methods. Currently, DHS undertakes similar matching to this program under the Data-matching Program (Assistance and Tax) Act 1990. (DMP). While the DMP addresses similar compliance risks, restriction of the Act has meant overtime, that DHS haven’t been able to introduce efficiencies developed in other matching programs. This has led to DHS’s activity under the DMP to become inefficient for customers and third parties as well as DHS itself when compared to the other compliance activity. The NEIDM program not only opens the door for DHS to recognise efficiencies, it will form part of DHS’s innovative compliance platform for the future. DHS’s will be able to address significantly more non-compliance and do so by empowering customers with more information. It is not possible to conduct this type of compliance activity without the exchange and matching of data. The NEIDM program represent the most efficient and effective alternative to address compliance related to un/under-declared income.
Alternative Methods. 1. Bargaining unit employees in a department may use an alternative method if a majority of the affected bargaining unit employees agree. The Union will conduct the vote. The method must be decided at the time of the vote, and will be in effect for the life of the contract.
Alternative Methods. A department may, by majority employee vote, decide to use an alternative method. The method must be decided at the time of the vote and will be in effect for the life of the contract. The Employer must be notified by the Union that a particular department is using an alternative method voted in by that department’s employees.
Alternative Methods. If it can be shown that alternative technology (e.g. computer, electronically controlled range switch, etc.) can give equivalent accuracy, then these alternatives may be used.
Alternative Methods. The Employer may elect under Part 13, #54.c. of the Agreement [Part 13, #72.c. of the 401(k) Agreement] to modify the default rules under this subsection (f). For example, the Employer may elect to attribute any Excess Amount which is allocated on the same date to this Plan and to another plan maintained by the Employer by designating the specific plan to which the Excess Amount is allocated or by using a pro rata allocation method. Under the pro rata allocation method, the Excess Amount attributed to this Plan is the product of:
Alternative Methods. Upon mutual agreement, an alternative method of bargaining may be used.
Alternative Methods i. A department may, by majority employee vote, decide to use an alternative method.
Alternative Methods of Resolution Notwithstanding any/all contrary provisions of Article 22, the parties reserve the right to mutually agree on an alternative grievance resolution process (including but not limited to referring the matter to a single arbitrator), in which case the associated fees and expenses of such alternative process shall be borne equally by the parties to the grievance.
Alternative Methods. Not Applicable Not applicable. The projected benefit cost trends were developed using utilization per 1000 and unit cost components. I.3.B.iii.(b)(iii) Other Components The projected benefit cost trends were developed by GSA, implicitly addressing regional differences in utilization and unit cost data.
