and Ex Sample Clauses

and Ex. 2.1. Relevant Authorities Means:

and Ex. 6. System Start-up Means operation of any System with the respective media/raw material or, with respect to any System that does not require media or raw material, operation of such System for its intended purpose. Time Schedule Means the detailed schedule for carrying out the Works as established in accordance with Article 8. Warranties Means the warranties given by the Contractor to the Owner in respect of the Works as set out in Article 20. Week Means a period of seven (7) consecutive Days. Works Means all or part of the works (including Materials, supplies, machinery, equipment, tools, buildings, roads, ways, Major Capital Spares, and/or other items of whatever nature (excluding the Contractor's Equipment), documents or services to be planned, designed, engineered, manufactured, procured, constructed, erected, installed, commissioned, tested, completed, carried out, undertaken or done by the Contractor in accordance with the Contract (including any part of the Works performed prior to the Contract Day and all Pre-Activities to be performed by the Contract Page 11(13) Contractor pursuant to the Pre-Activity Agreement), for the provision of a fully operating Plant (but excluding the Owner's Scope) as described in more detail, but without limitation, in the exhibits contained in Appendix 3, including Ex. 3.

and Ex. 4.6; and

and Ex. 4.6. The Certificate of Operational Acceptance of the Works shall be dated the same date as and, provided the conditions in clauses (b) and (c) have then been satisfied, issued (or deemed to be issued as the case may be) concurrently with the Certificate of Operational Acceptance for the last System for which a Certificate of Operational Acceptance is required to be issued.

and Ex. 2 The Secretariat, in close cooperation with the Chair of the Standing Committee and after consultation of the UNEP Law Division, has considered the matter and proposes that, on an exceptional basis, the Parties consider and approve the postponement of MOP8 as well as an interim budget for 2022 through employing a written/ silent procedure. A written procedure has to be specifically authorized by either (i) an in-person or online Meeting of the Parties; or (ii) a written procedure that itself authorizes the taking of decisions by written procedure. This type of written procedure is known as a “no objection” procedure. Thus, there would be need to be a two-step process, i.e (i) a decision authorizing the taking of decisions by written procedure and (ii) the circulation, consideration and adoption of the decision itself. It is suggested to provide a deadline of 2 weeks after circulation of a first letter regarding the authorization by Parties of a written procedure for the adoption of the two Resolutions. A deadline of 6 weeks would then again be provided after circulation of a second letter containing the draft Resolutions and inviting Parties to submit comments in written. Written comments will be shared with all Parties as soon as they are received by the Secretariat and/ or the Chair of the Standing Committee and taken into account. If no Party objects within the deadline, then the Resolutions shall be considered as adopted. This procedure is in line with General Assembly Decision 74/544 that is suggested to be applied mutatis mutandis in lack of a relevant regulation in the Agreement text.1 An opportunity for Parties to actively participate in the development of the budget proposal for 2022 is, moreover, being provided at the extraordinary meeting of the Standing Committee on 27 September 2021, which is open to all Parties invited to participate through Notification 2021/009, dated and circulated on 9 September 2021. Any Party who wishes to contribute to the budget proposal in its developing phase has the opportunity to take part at this online meeting as an active participant.

and Ex. JTC1.10. The main reason for the increase, accounting for approximately $14.4M per year in revenue requirement, relates to the smoothing of CIS revenue requirement. During the 2007 to Filed: Sept. 2, 2011 EB-2011-0226 Exhibit N1 Tab 1 Schedule 1 2012 period, the average annual CIS revenue requirements, as calculated through the 2007 Template, were relatively low. This is because during that period the Capital Cost Allowance (“CCA”) provided tax timing benefits to be recognized through 2012 in relation to the CIS asset’s ten year economic life. Under the smoothing approach used in the 2007 Template, all of the CCA timing benefit was spread through the first five years of the economic life of the CIS asset, with the result that the 2012 revenue requirement recovered in rates is, per the 2007 Settlement Agreement, intentionally lower than the actual forecast revenue requirement in that year. As of January 1, 2013, when all of the CCA benefit has been credited to the CIS revenue requirement during previous years, the annual CIS cost to be recovered in the remaining years of the asset’s economic life will necessarily increase. Through the 2007 Settlement Agreement, all parties were aware that the annual CIS-related revenue requirement would increase substantially at the end of the term of the Settlement Agreement, and all parties agreed that Enbridge would recover the full revenue requirement associated with the new CIS, throughout its economic life.9 As part of the Application, Xxxxxxxx indicated the reasons why there is some urgency to the relief sought. This was further explained in a letter dated July 20, 2011 where the Company indicated that: The reason [for the urgency] is that Enbridge’s current CCSA with Accenture expires on April 1, 2012, and six months’ notice must be provided if Enbridge wishes to extend the term of the current CCSA. The extended and updated CCSA that Xxxxxxxx has negotiated with Accenture will take effect as of April 1, 2012, but only if OEB approval of the cost consequences of that agreement has been obtained prior to that date. As a result, unless Xxxxxxxx receives OEB approval by September 30, 2011, it will have to negotiate another shorter term extension of the current CCSA in order to ensure that customer care services will be in place as of April 1, 2012. Further, if no OEB approval is received by around December 2011, then Enbridge will have to initiate a fresh RFP process for customer care services as of April 1, 2014 (which...

and Ex. NEEC-Common 2-1 (“The ability to aggregate programs at a sector level for the purposes of cost-effectiveness testing has not changed the current PA practice of evaluating program designs and measure mix opportunities.”). Given this, the Department should require formal action by the PAs and/or further proceedings to fully implement the GCA Amendments, via mid-term modification if necessary.

and Ex. 3 will be considered as adopted effective 1 December 2021 in the absence of any formal objection by Parties to AEWA. For more details, please contact the AEWA Secretariat at xxxx.xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxxx.xxx UNEP/AEWA Secretariat ● UN Campus ● Platz der Vereinten Nationen 1 ● 53113 Bonn ● Germany Tel.: (+00) 000 000 0000 ● Fax: (+00) 000 000 0000