APPLICATION EVALUATION Sample Clauses

APPLICATION EVALUATION. Each eligible application shall be evaluated on the basis of the information provided in the application and in accordance with this part.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
APPLICATION EVALUATION. All generation interconnection requests pursuant to this chapter will be reviewed by the District for compliance with the rules of this chapter. If the District in its sole discretion finds that the application does not comply with this chapter, the District may reject the application. If the District rejects the application, it shall provide the Applicant with written notification stating its reasons for rejecting the application.
Sample 1Sample 2
APPLICATION EVALUATION. Upon receipt of an intercon- nection application, the electrical company must notify the interconnection customer within ten business days whether the interconnection request is complete. If the application is not complete, the electrical company must provide a written list detailing all additional information necessary to complete the application. The interconnection customer must supply the necessary information or request an extension of time within ten business days. If the interconnection customer does not provide within ten business days the listed informa- tion necessary to complete the application or request an extension of time, the electrical company may reject the application. [Statutory Authority: RCW 80.01.040 and 80.04.160. 00-00-000 (Docket UE-060649, General Order 545), § 000-000-000, filed 9/27/07, effective 10/28/07; 00-00-000 (Docket No. UE-051106, General Order No. R-528), § 000-000-000, filed 3/6/06, effective 4/6/06.] (1) Each electrical company must file a model form of interconnection agreement for approval by the commission. (2) Simplified review process. Once an application is accepted by the electrical company as complete, the electrical company will review the application to determine if the inter- connection request complies with the technical standards established in WAC 000-000-000 and to determine whether any additional engineering, safety, reliability or other studies are required. The electrical company must notify the inter- connection customer of the result of these determinations within thirty business days of when the application is deemed complete. (3) If the electrical company notifies the interconnection customer that the request complies with the technical require- ments established in WAC 000-000-000 and no additional studies are required to determine the feasibility of the inter- connection, the electrical company must offer the intercon- nection customer an executable interconnection agreement within five business days of such notification. The electrical company also will provide any additional interim agree- ments, such as construction agreements, that may be neces- sary and a good faith estimate of the cost and time necessary to complete the interconnection. The interconnection cus- tomer must execute and return the completed agreement(s) within thirty business days following receipt. The intercon- nection customer must simultaneously pay any deposit required by the electrical company not to exceed fifty perc...
Sample 1
APPLICATION EVALUATION. All generation interconnection requests pursuant to this chapter will be reviewed by the PUD for compliance with the rules of this chapter. If the PUD, in its sole discretion, finds that the application does not comply with this chapter, the PUD may reject the application. If the PUD rejects the application, it shall provide the Customer-Generator with written notification stating its reasons for rejecting the application.
Sample 1
APPLICATION EVALUATION. 1. Local school boards must provide for an independent evaluation of the charter proposal by a third party with educational, organizational, legal, and financial expertise.
Sample 1
APPLICATION EVALUATION. All generation interconnection requests pursuant to this chapter will be reviewed by the PUD for compliance with the rules of this chapter. If the PUD, in its sole discretion, finds that the application does not comply with this chapter, the PUD may reject the application. If the PUD rejects the application, it shall provide the Customer-Generator with written notification stating its reasons for rejecting the application. Chapter 5: Interconnection Agreements and Costs 1. Once an application is accepted by the PUD as complete, the PUD shall determine if any additional engineering, safety, reliability or other studies are required. 2. If the PUD determines that additional studies are required, the PUD will provide to the Customer-Generator a Study Agreement. The Study Agreement shall include a description of the studies and a good faith estimate of the cost to perform the studies. The Customer-Generator shall have thirty (30) business days to return the completed Study Agreement along with any deposit required by the PUD against the estimated costs. a. Upon completion of the studies, the PUD shall provide the Customer- Generator with the results of the studies, including any additional interim agreements, such as construction agreements, that may be necessary and a cost estimate to complete the interconnection. If the studies determine that the interconnection is denied pursuant to RCW 80.60, the PUD shall provide notice of denial to the applicant and the reasons for the denial. 3. The PUD shall provide an Interconnection Agreement to the Customer-Generator to be completed and executed within thirty (30) days. a. Failure to return completed agreements within the time frames specified in subsections 2 and 3 of this section may result in termination of application process by the PUD. Terms and conditions for termination of the Interconnection Agreement shall be contained within such agreement.
Sample 1
APPLICATION EVALUATION 
Sample 1

Related to APPLICATION EVALUATION

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Trust Evaluation As of the Evaluation Time (a) on the last Business Day of each year, (b) on the day on which any Unit is tendered for redemption and (c) on any other day desired by the Trustee or requested by the Depositor, the Trustee shall: Add (i) all moneys on deposit in a Trust (excluding (1) cash, cash equivalents or Letters of Credit deposited pursuant to Section 2.01 hereof for the purchase of Contract Securities, unless such cash or Letters of Credit have been deposited in the Interest and Principal Accounts because of failure to apply such moneys to the purchase of Contract Securities pursuant to the provisions of Sections 2.01, 3.03 and 3.04 hereof and (2) moneys credited to the Reserve Account pursuant to Section 3.05 hereof), plus (ii) the aggregate Evaluation of all Securities (including Contract Securities and Reinvestment Securities) on deposit in such Trust as is determined by the Evaluator (such evaluations shall take into account and itemize separately (i) the cash on hand in the Trust or moneys in the process of being collected from matured interest coupons or bonds matured or called for redemption prior to maturity, (ii) the value of each issue of the Securities in the Trust on the bid side of the market as determined by the Evaluator pursuant to Section 4.01, and (iii) interest accrued thereon not subject to collection and distribution). For each such Evaluation there shall be deducted from the sum of the above (i) amounts representing any applicable taxes or governmental charges payable out of the respective Trust and for which no deductions shall have previously been made for the purpose of addition to the Reserve Account, (ii) amounts representing estimated accrued fees of the Trust and expenses of such Trust including but not limited to unpaid fees and expenses of the Trustee, the Evaluator, the Supervisor, the Depositor and bond counsel, in each case as reported by the Trustee to the Evaluator on or prior to the date of evaluation, (iii) any moneys identified by the Trustee, as of the date of the Evaluation, as held for distribution to Unitholders of record as of a Record Date or for payment of the Redemption Value of Units tendered prior to such date and (iv) unpaid organization costs in the estimated amount per Unit set forth in the Prospectus. The resulting figure is herein called a "Trust Fund Evaluation." The value of the pro rata share of each Unit of the respective Trust determined on the basis of any such evaluation shall be referred to herein as the "Unit Value."

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.