Assessing Effects a) Based on the results of the Class III archaeological and Tribal surveys, over 250 historic properties (including archaeological sites, historic structures, and properties of religious and cultural significance) have been found within the areas of land disturbance.
b) The NRC also conducted a line-of-sight analysis to assess the potential for adverse visual effects on all known historic properties located within three miles of the tallest buildings on both the Xxxxx and Burdock facilities.
c) In accordance with 36 CFR 800.5 and taking into account tribal input, Class III archaeological survey results, and line-of-sight analysis, the NRC has made its initial effects determination and provided a copy to the SD SHPO on December 16, 2013 for a 30 day concurrence period. The effects determination is presented in Appendix B.
d) The NRC distributed its determination of effect forwarded to the SD SHPO with associated documentations pursuant to 36 CFR 800.6(a)(3) to all consulting parties, as appropriate, for a 30-day review period. The NRC will consult to resolve any comments received in writing within the specified review period.
e) If the SD SHPO concurs with NRC’s determinations of effect, or if no written objections are received within the 30 day review period, the effect determination is final.
f) The NRC will consult to resolve any written objections received regarding determinations of effect. If a dispute arises, it will be resolved in accordance with Stipulation 15.
g) Based on its initial determination of effect, the NRC has found that there will be adverse effects to historic properties within the areas of ground disturbance as the result of this Undertaking (see Appendix B). If the SHPO agrees to the initial effects, determination, the NRC will consult with all signatories and consulting tribes to develop proposals to resolve these effects in accordance process set forth in this PA.
Assessing Effects a) Based on the results of the Class III archeological surveys and Tribal surveys, a number of historic properties (including archeological sites, historic structures, and properties of religious and cultural significances) have been found within the areas of land disturbance and an effects determination has been made by the NRC and is presented in Appendix B.
b) The NRC conducted a line-of-sight analysis to assess the potential for adverse visual effects on all known historic properties located within 3 miles of the tallest buildings on both the Xxxxx and Burdock facilities.
c) The NRC will assess adverse effects the Xxxxx-Xxxxxxx project will have on these historic properties, in accordance with 36 CFR 800.5. If adverse effects are found, the NRC will consult with signatories and concurring parties to develop proposals to resolve these effects in accordance with 36 CFR 800.6 and Stipulation 7.
Assessing Effects. After reviewing the information provided by the agency on the project’s effect on eligible or listed properties, the SHPO may agree or disagree with the agency’s assessment of the potential impact of the proposed action on historic properties. If historic properties will be affected, the SHPO comments will focus on ways to minimize or eliminate harm to the historic significance of those properties. Those comments may vary considerably, depending on the nature of agency plans. For example, the SHPO may request that the agency consider alternatives to the proposed action or redesign some portion of the action, or conduct archaeological data recovery in advance of ground disturbing activity. As a part of this consultation, the SHPO may request that the agency seek input from other parties. This section requires consultation between the agency and the SHPO, however under some circumstances, when other agencies, tribes, local governments or the general public may be directly affected or involved in the agency plan, these parties should be invited to participate. Agencies are encouraged to seek public comment and participation in their planning process. Interested parties may include representatives of Indian tribes or groups; Certified Local Governments; municipal governments, other state agencies, as well as applicants for or holders of grants, permits, or leases that have the potential to impact or alter properties that may be eligible for the Arizona Register of Historic Places. The following is a list of agency plans or actions that should be submitted to SHPO for review: New construction Renovation of buildings or structures Making Americans with Disabilities Act modifications Sale or lease of real property Granting a right-of-way or easement Issuing a permit or license Vacating or demolishing existing buildings or structures Infrastructure development Typical identification efforts include: Archaeological survey Literature search Building assessment Consultation with Native American tribes or groups Ethnographic research Consultation with the interested public (including local historical societies or commissions) Mitigation approaches include: Documentation that will archivally preserves the importance of the property. Documentation usually involves collecting historical information and photographs, preparing drawings and taking photographs. The specific types, numbers and sizes of documentation are resource specific. Meeting Rehabilitation Standards that...
