City and County of Denver Sample Clauses

City and County of Denver. United States District Court, District of Colorado, Civil Action No. 02-N-0740 (CBS) (the “Lawsuit”).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
City and County of Denver. Civil Action No. 06-cv-00865-LTB-BNB.
City and County of Denver. On the 2nd of August 2004, before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx known to me to be President and General Counsel of The Murrayhill Company, one of the parties that executed the within instrument and also known to me to be the person who executed it on behalf of said corporation, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within instrument.
City and County of Denver. This instrument was acknowledged before me on this 1st day of August, 2005, by Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx as Vice President of NEWMONT USA LIMITED d/b/a NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION.
City and County of Denver. Colorado, et al. (Case Xx. 0000xx0000, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx for the City and County of Denver, Colorado). On March 12, 2013, the trial court held that the online travel companies are liable for hotel occupancy taxes to the city and county of Denver, but held that taxes may not be collected for periods prior to April 2007 due to the bar of the statute of limitations. Both the city and county of Denver and the online travel companies have appealed from the trial court’s decision. On July 3, 2014, the Colorado Court of Appeals held that the online travel companies are not liable for hotel occupancy taxes. State of Wyoming Litigation. On February 28, 2013, the Wyoming Board of Equalization ruled that the online travel companies are liable for sales tax on their online services to the State of Wyoming. The online travel companies appealed. The Wyoming District Court certified the appeal to the Wyoming Supreme Court. On April 23, 2013, the Wyoming Supreme Court accepted review of the online travel companies’ appeal. The Wyoming Supreme Court heard oral argument regarding the online travel companies’ appeal on November 21, 2013. On April 3, 2014, the Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed the Wyoming Board of Equalization’s ruling that online travel companies are liable for hotel occupancy taxes. Other Tax Litigation Hawaii Tax Court Litigation (General Excise Tax). On January 31, 2011, the online travel companies received final notices of assessment for general excise taxes for the tax years 2000 to 2011 on their services relating to non-commissioned hotel room reservations. The companies appealed these assessments to the Hawaii tax court. On January 11, 2013, the Hawaii tax court ruled that the online travel companies are obligated to remit past Hawaii general excise taxes with interest on both the amount paid to the online travel companies for their services and the amount paid to the hotel for the room; thus subjecting the hotel’s charge for the room to double taxation because general excise taxes on the hotel room had already been paid for all of the years at issue. On March 15, 2013, the Hawaii tax court issued penalties against the online travel companies for their failure to file returns and pay general excise taxes. On August 12, 2013, the court further held that interest is due on such penalties. During the pendency of the tax court proceeding, the online travel companies petitioned the Hawaii Supreme Court for immediate review of the tax court’s January 11, 2013 rul...
City and County of Denver. On this 20th day of July, 2004, before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which were CA/DL and personal knowledge, to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding or attached document, and acknowledged to me that he signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose (as, Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary for Ultimate Electronics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and on behalf of Ultimate Electronics, Inc., the General Partner of Ultimate Electronics Texas LP, a Texas limited partnership). /s/ Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx (official signature and seal of notary) My commission expires: November 12, 2005 CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss.
City and County of Denver. On this 20th day of July, 2004, before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared Xxxx X. Xxxxxxx proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which were CO/DL and personal knowledge, to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding or attached document, and acknowledged to me that he signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose (as, Vice President and Treasurer for Ultimate Intangibles Corp., a Colorado corporation, Ultimate Leasing Corp., a Colorado corporation, Fast Trak Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and Ultimate Electronics Partners Corp., a Colorado corporation, and on behalf of Ultimate Leasing Corp., the General Partner of Ultimate Electronics Leasing LP, a Texas limited partnership). /s/ Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx (official signature and seal of notary) My commission expires: November 12, 2005
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
City and County of Denver. The foregoing instrument was subscribed, sworn to, and acknowledged before me this 6th day of May, 2004, by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx, as the Chief Executive Officer of Allied Motion Technologies Inc., a Colorado corporation, on behalf of the corporation. /s/ Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed, sworn to, and acknowledged before me this 6th day of May, 2004, by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx as the Vice President of Motor Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation, on behalf of the corporation. /s/ Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed, sworn to, and acknowledged before me this 6th day of May, 2004, by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx as the President of Allied Motion Control Corporation, a Colorado corporation, on behalf of the corporation. /s/ Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed, sworn to, and acknowledged before me this 6th day of May, 2004, by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx as the President of Emoteq Corporation, a Colorado corporation, on behalf of the corporation. /s/ Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed, sworn to, and acknowledged before me this 6th day of May, 2004, by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx as the President of Computer Optical Products, Inc., a Colorado corporation, on behalf of the corporation. /s/ Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed, sworn to, and acknowledged before me this 6th day of May, 2004, by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx as the President of AMOT I, Inc., a Delaware corporation, on behalf of the corporation. /s/ Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed, sworn to, and acknowledged before me this 6th day of May, 2004, by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx as the President of AMOT II, INC., a Delaware corporation, on behalf of the corporation. /s/ Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ) The foregoing instrument was subscribed, sworn to, and acknowledged before me this 6th day of May, 2004, by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx as the President of AMOT III, INC., a Delaware corporation, on behalf of the corporation. /s/ Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. CITY AND COUNTY OF...
City and County of Denver. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14th day of April, 2010, by Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, President of RECOVERY ENERGY, INC., a Nevada corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. /s/ Xxxx X. Xxxxx Notary Public Name: Xxxx X. Xxxxx Address: My commission expires: 4/30/2013 (NOTARIAL SEAL) PREAMBLE TO EXHIBIT “A” Attached to and made a part of that certain Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Production and Proceeds, Financing Statement and Fixture Filing, dated as of April 14, 2010 (the “Mortgage”), from Recovery Energy, Inc., as Debtor, and to and for the benefit of Hexagon Investments, LLC, as Secured Party

Related to City and County of Denver

  • Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Venue This Agreement and all acts and transactions hereunder and all rights and obligations of Silicon and Borrower shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. As a material part of the consideration to Silicon to enter into this Agreement, Borrower (i) agrees that all actions and proceedings relating directly or indirectly to this Agreement shall, at Silicon's option, be litigated in courts located within California, and that the exclusive venue therefor shall be Santa Xxxxx County; (ii) consents to the jurisdiction and venue of any such court and consents to service of process in any such action or proceeding by personal delivery or any other method permitted by law; and (iii) waives any and all rights Borrower may have to object to the jurisdiction of any such court, or to transfer or change the venue of any such action or proceeding.

  • Governing Law; Venue and Jurisdiction THIS DPA WILL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF THE LEA, WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICTS OF LAW PRINCIPLES. EACH PARTY CONSENTS AND SUBMITS TO THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION TO THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS FOR THE COUNTY OF THE LEA FOR ANY DISPUTE ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS DPA OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.

  • Governing Law; Consent to Jurisdiction; Venue (1) This Agreement, and all Proceedings (whether in contract or tort) that may be based upon, arise out of or relate to this Agreement, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to the conflicts of law rules of such State.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.