CLOSING REMARKS. We appreciate the opportunity to offer our services to your project. Should you desire that we revise any portion of this proposal, we will be pleased to meet with you to discuss the revisions. We look forward to being of service to you. RPS North America October 12, 2023 Page 3 of 3 Respectfully submitted, HTS, Inc. Consultants Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Ph.D., P.E. President Attachments: Cost Estimate SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAME: JH/rg COST ESTIMATE 23-00200 Rev.1 ITEM EST. QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EST. COST
A) Drill/Sample 6, 10' Deep Borings Mobe/demobe 3" diameter (0' to 10') Traffic control (including signage & cones) Grouting the borings Locate/identify borings Lump Sum 60 feet 1 day 60 feet 4 hours $ 750.00 $ 18.00 $ 600.00 $ 10.00 $ 50.00 $ 750.00 $ 1,080.00 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 200.00 SUBTOTAL = $ 3,230.00
B) Laboratory Analyses Atterberg limits(ASTM D 4318) Unconfined compression test (ASTM D 2166) Moisture content (ASTM D 2216) Percent material passing No. 200 sieve (ASTM D 1140) 12 tests 6 tests 12 tests 12 tests $ 63.00 $ 50.00 $ 10.00 $ 55.00 $ 756.00 $ 300.00 $ 120.00 $ 660.00 SUBTOTAL = $ 1,836.00
C) Engineering Analysis and Report Preparation Senior engineer, P.E. Project engineer, P.E. Support personnel (CAD/clerical) 2 hours 12 hours 4 hours $ 183.00 $ 149.00 $ 50.00 $ 366.00 $ 1,788.00 $ 200.00 SUBTOTAL = $ 2,354.00 TOTAL COST = $ 7,420.00
CLOSING REMARKS. 21.1 The Vice-chair thanked everybody who had taken part in the meeting, the Secretariat, the technical staff, the interpreters, the stenographers, and everyone else involved in meeting organisation. She welcomed the new appointees to ACAP positions. The Vice-chair then reflected on her close working relationship and friendship with the out-going Chair, Xxxxxx Xxxxxx. She thanked him for his outstanding contribution to XXXX’s work and wished him well in his future endeavours.
21.2 Many other delegates then expressed their thanks to the Chair for his dedicated work on behalf of XXXX.
21.3 The Chair, in his closing remarks, described his experiences as AC Chair and how much he had learned from this role. He recalled the many experiences and friendships around the world that had come his way through his ACAP work. He highlighted the progress achieved by the Agreement over this period and noted challenges ahead. The Chair also recalled the excellent contribution to ACAP’s work by Xx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx (who has left his position as Co-convenor of the SBWG to manage the Xxxxxx Island mouse eradication project) and Xxxx Xxxxxx, XXXX’s honorary Information Officer, who has given years of dedication to the Agreement and will be retiring in mid-2022. Finally, the Chair thanked all ACAP officials for their hard work and dedication, and reiterated the Vice-chair’s thanks to all involved in running the meeting.
21.4 The Advisory Committee thanked the Chair and Vice-chair for their excellent stewardship during the meeting.
CLOSING REMARKS. We appreciate the opportunity to offer our services to your project. Should you desire that we revise any portion of this proposal, we will be pleased to meet with you to discuss the revisions. We look forward to being of service to you. Respectfully submitted, HTS, Inc. Consultants Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Ph.D., P.E. President Attachments: Proposed Boring Location Cost Estimate (Task 1) Cost Estimate (Task 2)
CLOSING REMARKS. 19.1 The Chair thanked all delegations, including Observers, for their input to the Working Group and Advisory Committee meetings. He summarised some key outcomes from AC13:
(i) A revised Advisory Committee Work Programme and Secretariat Work Programme.
(ii) Outcomes from MoP7 noted.
(iii) Establishment of six intersessional groups on: AC reporting to the MoP; bycatch indicators; bycatch data, ACAP’s RFMO Engagement Strategy; ACAP’s Communication Strategy; and H5N1 avian influenza.
(iv) Endorsement of updates to Best Practice Advice on Seabird Bycatch.
(v) Close consideration of bycatch data needs.
(vi) Greater emphasis on compliance with ACAP’s Best Practice Advice for bycatch mitigation and the potential need for other indicators to enable more confidence in compliance with mitigation measures.
(vii) The re-establishment of the Species Assessments Coordinating Group.
(viii) Discussion of emerging threats, especially OWFs and avian influenza.
(ix) A draft agenda and venue for AC14 (Peru).
(x) Renewal of the appointment of the current officials occupying most of the Convenor and Vice-convenor positions, with new appointees to one SBWG Co-viceconvenor position and to the TWG Vice-convenor position.
(xi) Renewal of the mandates of current holders of the positions of Chair and Vice-chair.
19.2 The Chair thanked everybody who had taken part in and supported the meeting: the Working Group convenors and Vice-convenors, the Secretariat, the technical assistant, the interpreters, the catering, reception and security officials at the venue, and everyone else involved in meeting organisation. He welcomed the new appointees to ACAP positions, and thanked the Vice-chair for agreeing to stay on. He highlighted the sterling assistance by UK colleagues in hosting the meeting.
19.3 The Vice-chair expressed her thanks and those of all the delegations to the Chair for his excellent steering of the meeting.
19.4 The Chair closed the meeting.
CLOSING REMARKS. 10.1 The Chair thanked the interpreters, translators and the Secretariat for their efforts and acknowledged the contributions of delegates to a successful meeting.
10.2 Parties expressed their thanks to the Chair, Vice-chair, Secretariat and interpreters for steering the meeting through some complex and detailed issues. In addition, several Parties showed their appreciation for the financial support provided to them by the Secretariat which enabled them to attend the meeting.
10.3 Sincere thanks were extended to the Government of Peru for hosting the meeting.
CLOSING REMARKS. We look forward to a mutually beneficial relationship and the success that our cooperation will bring. Thank you for your commitment and trust in OpenEDG.
CLOSING REMARKS. 16 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
CLOSING REMARKS. Truven Health Analytics is well positioned to perform the T-MSIS extract work for NE DHHS. We are intimately familiar with the NE DHHS Medicaid data and how data flows within the environment. We can efficiently perform this work as we will leverage our knowledge and experience producing MSIS and T-MSIS extracts for other state Medicaid agencies. We will utilize the NE DHHS extracts as the source of the data. Lastly, we will serve as a partner with NE DHHS and CMS to ensure the extracts are of the highest quality and meet the CMS requirements.
CLOSING REMARKS. We contribute to the study of scalability on modern Blockchain systems by presenting SepChain, a novel approach based on a 20-year old concept of separating the agreement and execution phases of a state machine replication model into individual components, and we apply it to a Blockchain setting. Our results show that even with a simplified, non-intrusive implementation we can outperform a monolithic Blockchain system. We hope that this work paves way for future research in the area, stimulates the discussion on what should be the right focus of the research and development efforts of the Blockchain communities to improve future systems, and challenges the current Blockchain system architecture paradigm as a whole.
