Comparison Process Sample Clauses

Comparison Process a. Upon receipt, Offers will be checked for the presence or absence of required content. Incomplete Offers may be rejected. No assumptions will be made by XxxXXXX regarding the intentions of the Respondent in submitting the Offer.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (19)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Comparison Process a. Upon receipt, Offers will be checked for the presence or absence of required content. Incomplete Offers may be rejected. No assumptions will be made by CalSTRS regarding the intentions of the Respondent in submitting the Offer.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Comparison Process a. Upon receipt, Offers will be checked for the presence or absence of required content. Incomplete Offers may be rejected. No assumptions will be made by CalSTRS regarding the intentions of the Respondent in submitting the Offer. b. Offers and any subsequent presentations should be submitted with the most favorable terms the Respondent can offer. c. If CalSTRS is unable to execute an agreement with the most qualified and responsible Respondent, CalSTRS reserves the right to award the agreement to the next qualified and responsible Respondent. d. Offers will be reviewed to determine best value using the following phases: 1 PREQUALIFICATION OF MINIMUM ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS Pass/Fail 2 TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW 70 points 3 COST COMPARISON 30 points 4 INTERVIEWS (OPTIONAL) 100 points REFERENCE CHECKS (OPTIONAL) Pass/Fail 5 COST NEGOTIATIONS Pass/Fail 1) In Phase 1, the Respondent’s offer will be reviewed for compliance with the minimum qualifications, content and format requirements of the RFO. Both the minimum administrative and technical qualifications must be met as specified in Section C, Qualifications Requirements. Failure to satisfy any of part of prequalification may result in the immediate disqualification of the offer and/or applicable proposed project person. 2) Proposed project personnel who meet the minimum qualifications will move to Phase 2, Technical Qualification Review. Each Proposed Project Person’s expertise, experience, and education will be reviewed and scored based on the information provided in their Attachment II, Skill Summary Sheet (which also includes desirable qualifications), and resume. 3) In Phase 3, Cost Comparison, the hourly rate provided in the Respondent’s Attachment I, will be scored using the cost formula indicated below. The Respondent’s proposed project person with the lowest hourly rate will receive the full allotment of points. All other Respondents’ proposed project personnel will be scored as follows:
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to Comparison Process

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Change Management Process If Customer or Oracle requests a change in any of the specifications, requirements, Deliverables, or scope (including drawings and designs) of the Professional Services described in any Statement of Work, the party seeking the change shall propose the applicable changes by written notice. Within forty-eight (48) hours of receipt of the written notice, each party’s project leads shall meet, either in person or via telephone conference, to discuss and agree upon the proposed changes. Oracle will prepare a change order describing the proposed changes to the Statement of Work and the applicable change in fees and expenses, if any (each, a “Change Order”). Change Orders are not binding unless and until they are executed by both parties. Executed Change Orders shall be deemed part of, and subject to, this Addendum. If the parties disagree about the proposed changes, the parties shall promptly escalate the change request to their respective senior management for resolution.

  • Completion of Evaluation Cycle 1. The summative evaluation rating shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.

  • Project Reporting A summary of the Recipient’s performance against their agreed to deliverables and commitments as defined in the annual Regional Operations Plan and Budget during the previous quarter.

  • CONTRACT SALES REPORTING Contractor shall report total contract sales quarterly to Enterprise Services, as set forth below.

  • Benchmarking Process 2.2.1 The Supplier shall produce and send to the Authority for Approval, a draft plan for the Benchmark Review.

  • Progress Reporting 5. The IP will submit to UNICEF narrative progress reports against the planned activities contained in the Programme Document, using the PDPR. Unless otherwise agreed between the Parties in writing, these reports will be submitted at the end of every Quarter. The final report will be submitted no later than thirty (30) calendar days after the end the Programme and will be provided together with the FACE form.

  • Benchmarking 19.1 The Parties shall comply with the provisions of Framework Schedule 12 (Continuous Improvement and Benchmarking) in relation to the benchmarking of any or all of the Goods and/or Services.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!