Comparison Process Sample Clauses

Comparison Process a. Upon receipt, Offers will be checked for the presence or absence of required content. Incomplete Offers may be rejected. No assumptions will be made by XxxXXXX regarding the intentions of the Respondent in submitting the Offer. b. Offers and any subsequent presentations should be submitted with the most favorable terms the Respondent can offer. c. If XxxXXXX is unable to execute an agreement with the most qualified and responsible Respondent, XxxXXXX reserves the right to award the agreement to the next qualified and responsible Respondent. d. Offers will be reviewed to determine best value using the following phases:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (17)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Comparison Process a. Upon receipt, Offers will be checked for the presence or absence of required content. Incomplete Offers may be rejected. No assumptions will be made by CalSTRS regarding the intentions of the Respondent in submitting the Offer. b. Offers and any subsequent presentations should be submitted with the most favorable terms the Respondent can offer. c. If CalSTRS is unable to execute an agreement with the most qualified and responsible Respondent, CalSTRS reserves the right to award the agreement to the next qualified and responsible Respondent. d. Offers will be reviewed to determine best value using the following phases: 1 PREQUALIFICATION OF MINIMUM ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS Pass/Fail 2 TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW 70 points 3 COST COMPARISON 30 points 4 INTERVIEWS (OPTIONAL) 100 points REFERENCE CHECKS (OPTIONAL) Pass/Fail 5 COST NEGOTIATIONS Pass/Fail 1) In Phase 1, the Respondent’s offer will be reviewed for compliance with the minimum qualifications, content and format requirements of the RFO. Both the minimum administrative and technical qualifications must be met as specified in Section C, Qualifications Requirements. Failure to satisfy any of part of prequalification may result in the immediate disqualification of the offer and/or applicable proposed project person. 2) Proposed project personnel who meet the minimum qualifications will move to Phase 2, Technical Qualification Review. Each Proposed Project Person’s expertise, experience, and education will be reviewed and scored based on the information provided in their Attachment II, Skill Summary Sheet (which also includes desirable qualifications), and resume. 3) In Phase 3, Cost Comparison, the hourly rate provided in the Respondent’s Attachment I, will be scored using the cost formula indicated below. The Respondent’s proposed project person with the lowest hourly rate will receive the full allotment of points. All other Respondents’ proposed project personnel will be scored as follows:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Comparison Process a. Upon receipt, Offers will be checked for the presence or absence of required content. Incomplete Offers may be rejected. No assumptions will be made by CalSTRS regarding the intentions of the Respondent in submitting the Offer. b. Offers and any subsequent presentations should be submitted with the most favorable terms the Respondent can offer. c. If CalSTRS is unable to execute an agreement with the most qualified and responsible Respondent, CalSTRS reserves the right to award the agreement to the next qualified and responsible Respondent. d. Offers will be reviewed to determine best value using the following phases:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)

Related to Comparison Process

  • Metrics Institutional Metrics System-Wide Metrics

  • CONTRACT SALES REPORTING Contractor shall report total contract sales quarterly to Enterprise Services, as set forth below.

  • Progress Reporting 5. The IP will submit to UNICEF narrative progress reports against the planned activities contained in the Programme Document, using the PDPR. Unless otherwise agreed between the Parties in writing, these reports will be submitted at the end of every Quarter. The final report will be submitted no later than thirty (30) calendar days after the end the Programme and will be provided together with the FACE form.

  • Benchmarking 19.1 The Parties shall comply with the provisions of Framework Schedule 12 (Continuous Improvement and Benchmarking) in relation to the benchmarking of any or all of the Goods and/or Services.

  • Measurement and Billing 5.6.1 For billing purposes, each Party shall pass Calling Party Number ("CPN") information on each call carried over the Traffic Exchange Trunks at such time as the originating switch is equipped for SS7 and from all switches no later than December 31, 1998. At such time as either Party has the ability, as the Party receiving the traffic, to use such CPN information to classify on an automated basis traffic delivered by the other Party as either Local Traffic or Toll Traffic, such receiving Party shall xxxx the originating Party the Local Traffic termination rates, Intrastate Exchange Access rates, or Interstate Exchange Access rates applicable to each minute of Traffic for which CPN is passed, as provided in Exhibit A and applicable Tariffs. 5.6.2 If, under the circumstances set forth in subsection 5.6.1, the originating Party does not pass CPN on up to ten percent (10%) of calls, the receiving Party shall xxxx the originating Party the Local Traffic termination rates, Intrastate Exchange Access rates, Intrastate/Interstate Transit Traffic rates, or Interstate Exchange Access rates applicable to each minute of traffic, as provided in Exhibit A and applicable Tariffs, for which CPN is passed. For the remaining up to ten percent (10%) of calls without CPN information, the receiving Party shall xxxx the originating Party for such traffic as Local Traffic termination rates, Intrastate Exchange Access rates, Intrastate/Interstate Transit Traffic rates, or Interstate Exchange Access rates applicable to each minute of traffic, as provided in Exhibit A and applicable Tariffs, in direct proportion to the minutes of use of calls passed with CPN information. 5.6.3 If the originating Party does not pass CPN on more than ten percent (10%) of calls, or if the receiving Party lacks the ability to use CPN information to classify on an automated basis traffic delivered by the other Party as either Local Traffic or Toll Traffic, and the originating Party chooses to combine Local and Toll Traffic on the same trunk group, it will supply an auditable Percent Local Use ("PLU") report quarterly, based on the previous three months' traffic, and applicable to the following three months. If the originating Party also chooses to combine Interstate and Intrastate Toll Traffic on the same trunk group, it will supply an auditable Percent Interstate Use ("PIU") report quarterly, based on the previous three months' terminating traffic, and applicable to the following three months. In lieu of the foregoing PLU and/or PIU reports, the Parties may agree to provide and accept reasonable surrogate measures for an agreed-upon interim period. 5.6.4 Measurement of billing minutes for purposes of determining terminating compensation shall be in conversation seconds.

  • Performance Reporting The State of California is required to submit the following financial reports to FEMA:

  • Milestones Subject to the provisions of the SGIP, the Parties shall agree on milestones for which each Party is responsible and list them in Attachment 4 of this Agreement. A Party’s obligations under this provision may be extended by agreement. If a Party anticipates that it will be unable to meet a milestone for any reason other than a Force Majeure event, it shall immediately notify the other Parties of the reason(s) for not meeting the milestone and (1) propose the earliest reasonable alternate date by which it can attain this and future milestones, and (2) requesting appropriate amendments to Attachment 4. The Party affected by the failure to meet a milestone shall not unreasonably withhold agreement to such an amendment unless it will suffer significant uncompensated economic or operational harm from the delay, (1) attainment of the same milestone has previously been delayed, or (2) it has reason to believe that the delay in meeting the milestone is intentional or unwarranted notwithstanding the circumstances explained by the Party proposing the amendment.

  • Infertility Services This plan covers the following services, in accordance with R.I. General Law §27-20-20. • Services for the diagnosis and treatment of infertility if you are:

  • The Performance Improvement Process (a) The Performance Improvement Process will focus on the risks of non- performance and problem-solving. It may include one or more of the following actions: (1) a requirement that the HSP develop and implement an improvement plan that is acceptable to the LHIN; (2) the conduct of a Review; (3) a revision and amendment of the HSP’s obligations; and (4) an in-year, or year end, adjustment to the Funding, among other possible means of responding to the Performance Factor or improving performance. (b) Any performance improvement process begun under a prior service accountability agreement that was not completed under the prior agreement will continue under this Agreement. Any performance improvement required by a LHIN under a prior service accountability agreement will be deemed to be a requirement of this Agreement until fulfilled or waived by the LHIN.

  • PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT The parties’ support the principle of continuing training of teachers, participation by teachers in professional organizations in the areas of their specialization, leaves for work on advanced degrees or special studies, foreign travel and participation in community educational projects.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!