Compliance assessment. 4.1. Case 1
Compliance assessment. The compliance of the vehicle shall be followed in paragraph 4. of Annex 7 of this Regulation.
Compliance assessment. 6.1. Within 10 working days of the end of the ISC testing for the sample as referred to in paragraph 5.10.5., the granting type approval authority shall start detailed investigations with the manufacturer in order to decide whether the ISC family (or part of it) complies with the ISC rules and whether it requires remedial measures. For multistage or special purpose vehicles the granting type approval authority shall also perform detailed investigations when there are at least three faulty vehicles with the same fault or five flagged vehicles in the same ISC family, as set out in paragraph 5.10.6.
6.2. The granting type approval authority shall ensure that sufficient resources are available to cover the costs for compliance assessment. Without prejudice to national law, those costs shall be recovered by fees that can be levied on the manufacturer by the granting type approval authority. Such fees shall cover all testing or auditing needed in order for an assessment on compliance to be reached.
6.3. On the request of the manufacturer, the granting type approval authority may extend the investigations to vehicles in service of the same manufacturer belonging to other ISC families which are likely to be affected by the same defects.
6.4. The detailed investigation shall take no more than 60 working days after the start of the investigation by the granting type approval authority. The granting type approval authority may conduct additional ISC tests designed to determine why vehicles have failed during the original ISC tests. The additional tests shall be conducted under similar conditions as the original ISC failed ISC tests. Upon the request of the granting type approval authority, the manufacturer shall provide additional information, showing in particular the possible cause 49 of the failures, which parts of the family might be affected, whether other families might be affected, or why the problem which caused the failure at the original ISC tests is not related to in-service conformity, if applicable. The manufacturer shall be given the opportunity to prove that the in-service conformity provisions have been complied with.
6.5. Within the deadline set out in paragraph 6.4., the granting type approval authority shall take the decision on the compliance or the non-compliance. In case of non-compliance, the granting type approval authority shall define the remedial measures for the ISC family according to paragraph 7. It shall notify them to the manufacturer.
Compliance assessment. Feasibility/Planning Phase:
Compliance assessment. 5.1. Case 1 The compliance of the vehicle is acceptable if the measured sound pressure levels of all valid test runs are lower than or equal to the expected sound pressure levels of paragraph 4.5.4.3. LTEST ≤ LTEST_EXP
5.2. Case 2 If not more than two valid runs of the specified runs exceed the expected sound pressure level of paragraph 4.5.4.3. by not more than 2 dB the compliance of the vehicle is acceptable.
5.3. Case 3 If more than two valid runs of the specified runs exceed the expected sound pressure level of paragraph 4.5.4.3. then the vehicle is non-compliant with RD- ASEP.
5.4. Case 4 If one or more valid runs exceed the expected sound pressure level of paragraph
4.5.4.3. by more than 2 dB, the vehicle is non-compliant with RD-ASEP.
Compliance assessment. The Sub-Adviser will, from time to time, provide a written assessment of its compliance program in conformity with current industry standards that is reasonably acceptable to the Fund to enable the Fund to fulfill its obligations under Rule 38a-1 under the 1940 Act.
Compliance assessment. Each question below is derived from the Grant Agreement and therefore, a question marked “No” indicates the Grantee is out of compliance with the terms of the Grant Agreement.
Compliance assessment. 22.1. You confirm that we may conduct a compliance assessment to ensure that you are compliant with the Merchant Agreement, and you agree to provide us or one of our appointed independent accredited Third- Party Service Providers, access and reasonable assistance to conduct a physical inspection of your premises, records, documentation and systems pertaining to the Merchant Agreement.
22.2. Such compliance assessment will not unreasonably interfere with your normal business operations.
22.3. In the event that the compliance assessment confirms that you are not compliant:
22.3.1. you will be held liable for the cost of the compliance assessment;
22.3.2. you will be held liable for any Losses incurred by us as a result of your non-compliance;
22.3.3. we will have the right to terminate this Merchant Agreement with immediate effect;
22.3.4. we may further rely on any of the remedies available to us in law.
Compliance assessment. 5.1. Case 1 The compliance of the vehicle is acceptable if the measured sound pressure levels of all valid test runs are lower than or equal to the expected sound pressure levels of paragraph 4.5.4.3.
Compliance assessment. Vendor shall conduct semi-annual self-audits to ensure compliance with these Information Security Requirements. Within thirty (30) days of the completion of each compliance audit, Vendor shall provide to The Hartford a report of the findings and recommendations. Except as may otherwise be provided in the Agreement, in the event that any non-compliance or breach is discovered during the audit, Vendor must notify The Hartford within a commercially reasonable time-frame and shall promptly mitigate and attempt to cure the non-compliance or breach.
