Compliance assessment Clause Samples

Compliance assessment. The compliance of the vehicle shall be followed in paragraph 4. of Annex 7 of this Regulation.

Compliance assessment. 6.1. Within 10 working days of the end of the ISC testing for the sample as referred to in paragraph 5.10.5., the granting type approval authority shall start detailed investigations with the manufacturer in order to decide whether the ISC family (or part of it) complies with the ISC rules and whether it requires remedial measures. For multistage or special purpose vehicles the granting type approval authority shall also perform detailed investigations when there are at least three faulty vehicles with the same fault or five flagged vehicles in the same ISC family, as set out in paragraph 5.10.6. 6.2. The granting type approval authority shall ensure that sufficient resources are available to cover the costs for compliance assessment. Without prejudice to national law, those costs shall be recovered by fees that can be levied on the manufacturer by the granting type approval authority. Such fees shall cover all testing or auditing needed in order for an assessment on compliance to be reached. 6.3. On the request of the manufacturer, the granting type approval authority may extend the investigations to vehicles in service of the same manufacturer belonging to other ISC families which are likely to be affected by the same defects. 6.4. The detailed investigation shall take no more than 60 working days after the start of the investigation by the granting type approval authority. The granting type approval authority may conduct additional ISC tests designed to determine why vehicles have failed during the original ISC tests. The additional tests shall be conducted under similar conditions as the original ISC failed ISC tests. Upon the request of the granting type approval authority, the manufacturer shall provide additional information, showing in particular the possible cause of the failures, which parts of the family might be affected, whether other families might be affected, or why the problem which caused the failure at the original ISC tests is not related to in-service conformity, if applicable. The manufacturer shall be given the opportunity to prove that the in-service conformity provisions have been complied with. 6.5. Within the deadline set out in paragraph 6.4., the granting type approval authority shall take the decision on the compliance or the non-compliance. In case of non-compliance, the granting type approval authority shall define the remedial measures for the ISC family according to paragraph 7. It shall notify them to the manufacturer.

Compliance assessment. 5.1. Case 1 The compliance of the vehicle is acceptable if the measured sound pressure levels of all valid test runs are lower than or equal to the expected sound pressure levels of paragraph 4.5.4.3.

Compliance assessment. Feasibility/Planning Phase:

Compliance assessment. 5.1. Case 1 The compliance of the vehicle is acceptable if the measured sound pressure levels of all valid test runs are lower than or equal to the expected sound pressure levels of paragraph 4.5.4.3. LTEST ≤ LTEST_EXP 5.2. Case 2 If not more than two valid runs of the specified runs exceed the expected sound pressure level of paragraph 4.5.4.3. by not more than 2 dB the compliance of the vehicle is acceptable. 5.3. Case 3 If more than two valid runs of the specified runs exceed the expected sound pressure level of paragraph 4.5.4.3. then the vehicle is non-compliant with RD- ASEP. 5.4. Case 4 If one or more valid runs exceed the expected sound pressure level of paragraph

Compliance assessment. The Sub-Adviser will, from time to time, provide a written assessment of its compliance program in conformity with current industry standards that is reasonably acceptable to the Fund to enable the Fund to fulfill its obligations under Rule 38a-1 under the 1940 Act.

Compliance assessment. In the case of Registrars which are Accredited for a .za Namespace: 5.12.1. The Registry may assess the Registrar’s compliance with the Accreditation Criteria and with this Agreement, from time to time upon no less than 30 (thirty) calendar days’ written notice, provided that such assessment may not be carried out more than once per two calendar years . The notice must specify the documents, data and other information the Registry reasonably requires to verify the Registrar’s complaince with the Accreditation Criteria and with this Agreement, subject to applicable data protection legislation. 5.12.2. The Registry shall at its own expense conduct such compliance assessment in a manner that does not unreasonably disrupt the operations of the Registrar. 5.12.3. Upon receipt of such notice, the Registrar must, not less than 15 (fifteen) calendar days before the assessment, make available to the Registry all documents, data and any other information required to verify Registrar’s compliance with the Accreditation Criteria and with this Agreement, subject to applicable data protection legislation.

Compliance assessment. The Fourth Amendment allows for ongoing evaluation of monitoring data, analysis of compliance well data, evaluation of potential impacts to downgradient ▇▇▇▇▇, preparation of relevant portions of the annual report for 2022, interactions with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Board), and ongoing project management. Task 14. As/Mn Compliance Implementation Support.

Compliance assessment. Each question below is derived from the Grant Agreement and therefore, a question marked “No” indicates the Grantee is out of compliance with the terms of the Grant Agreement.