Compliance with NEPA. The Borrower has complied, with respect to the Project, with all applicable requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.).
Compliance with NEPA. DOE has (i) issued an Environmental Impact Statement for the Project pursuant to NEPA, (ii) issued a Record of Decision with respect to the Project and (iii) received evidence of satisfaction of and compliance with all material additional environmental requirements specified in the Environmental Impact Statement (or referenced therein) and required to be complied with as of the Guarantee Issuance Date, and (iv) with respect to any environmental requirements specified in the Environmental Impact Statement (or referenced therein) and required to be complied with after the Guarantee Issuance Date, DOE is satisfied with the Borrower’s plan to comply with such requirements.
Compliance with NEPA. The proposed action is categorically excluded from documentation in an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. The proposed action is a kind of action that has been determined to fit within a category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have significant effects on the human environment. The proposed action falls within the category of actions at 516 DM 11.9.E (12): Grants of right-of-way wholly within the boundaries of other compatibly developed rights-of-way. This categorical exclusion is appropriate in this situation because there are no extraordinary circumstances potentially having effects that may significantly affect the environment. The proposed action has been reviewed, and none of the extraordinary circumstances described in 43 CFR 46.215 apply, as described below:
a. The proposed action would not have significant impacts on public health or safety. The authorization of this right-of-way will have no new or significant impacts on health or public safety. The access roads and landing pile area has been used by the BLM within the past several years to harvest timber on public lands. The BLM activities were approved in an Environmental Assessment for the Huckleberry Mountains Forest Management project in 2005. Issuing the road access and landing pile as proposed would not have an impact on public health or safety.
b. The proposed action would not have significant impacts on such natural resources and unique geographic characteristics as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation or refuge lands; wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers; national natural landmarks; sole or principal drinking water aquifers; prime farmlands; wetlands (Executive Order 11990); floodplains (Executive Order 11988); national monuments; migratory birds; and other ecologically significant or critical areas. These roads and landing pile exist; any road management activities will be minor and will have no significant impacts to natural or cultural resources.
c. The proposed action would not have highly controversial environmental effects or involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources [NEPA Section 102(2)(E)]. The effects of issuing a license agreement to authorize utilization and maintenance of existing roads and a landing pile are well understood. There are no highly controversial environmental effects or unresolved conflicts concerning this action.
d. The proposed action would not have highly uncert...
Compliance with NEPA. The Guarantor shall have completed to its sole satisfaction the environmental review under NEPA, and the Borrower shall have provided all environmental analyses and other information needed for the Guarantor to complete its environmental review under NEPA.
Compliance with NEPA. Addition of a new section 315 (which may be a misprint, should have said section 321?): Any FMP or regulation that is prepared in accordance with sections 303 and 304 of the MSA is considered to satisfy NEPA, specifically section 102(2)(C), which is the requirement that the federal government provide a detailed statement about the environmental impacts, alternatives, etc (the NEPA analysis).
Compliance with NEPA. DOE shall have:
(i) completed its review and related consultations under NEPA with respect to the Guaranteed Loan and the Turtle Creek Project Site; and
(ii) issued and published a Categorical Exclusion review of the portion of the Project located at the Turtle Creek Project Site pursuant to 10 CFR 1021.410 (b) with respect to the Guaranteed Loan.
Compliance with NEPA. DOE shall have:
(i) completed its review under NEPA and any other applicable or cooperating Governmental Authority has also completed its review under NEPA for the Project;
(ii) issued an environmental assessment for the Project (“Environmental Assessment”), which environmental assessment shall support a Finding of No Significant Impact (“FONSI”) or mitigated FONSI pursuant to 40 C.F.R. 1501.6 with respect to the Project and the Loan;
(iii) received evidence of satisfaction of any mitigations, environmental permits, and environmental consultations required pursuant to the FONSI or mitigated FONSI for the Project and that Xxxxxxxx has provided DOE and all applicable lead agencies all environmental analyses and other information that DOE notifies the Borrower in writing is needed for the satisfactory completion of all applicable actions pursuant to NEPA for the Project; and
(iv) issued the final agency decision pursuant to NEPA and any lawsuits or appeals with respect thereto have been resolved to DOE’s satisfaction.
Compliance with NEPA. Environmental Reports), any Environmental Claims or notices delivered to DOE by the Borrower during the applicable reporting period, and information reasonably requested by DOE; and (B) contain, or be supplemented with, any information reasonably requested by XXX. The reports completed for the reporting period ending on December 31 of each Fiscal Year shall include a section specific to the reporting period, including an annual summary of all the reports completed for the Fiscal Year.
Compliance with NEPA. Section 15.1 Joint Effort; Lead Agency............................. Section 15.2 Costs.................................................
Compliance with NEPA. With respect to the First Advance of Tranche 3, DOE shall have completed its review and related consultations under NEPA with respect to the Guaranteed Loan and the Duquesne Project Site.
