Components of the Program of Evaluation Sample Clauses

Components of the Program of Evaluation. An evaluation of the faculty members’ performance by the School Xxxx or approved Administrator, which shall include a classroom or workplace observation and assessment by the School Xxxx or approved Administrator of those activities which constitute the faculty members primary contractual duties and the following:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Components of the Program of Evaluation. 17.4.1 The evaluation process shall include the following components:
Components of the Program of Evaluation. 18.3.1 The evaluation process shall include the following components: 18.3.1.1 an Administrative Evaluation of the Unit Member’s performance which shall include a classroom/worksite observation and assessment by the Immediate Management Supervisor of those activities which constitute the Unit Member’s primary contractual duties: 18.3.1.2 student evaluations; 18.3.1.3 an assessment of the Unit Member’s performance by a peer reviewer, at the option of the Unit Member. 18.3.2 Faculty have within their professional responsibilities and as part of their professional obligation the responsibility to participate in program and curriculum development and evaluation, which includes appropriate participation in the formulation of Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and the Student Learning Outcomes assessment cycle. However, student performance on SLO assessments shall not be a component of a Unit Member’s evaluation process.

Related to Components of the Program of Evaluation

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Program Costs a. The Seller Parties shall reimburse Administrative Agent and Buyers for any of Administrative Agent’s and Buyers’ reasonable and documented out-of-pocket costs, including due diligence review costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, incurred by Administrative Agent and Buyers in determining the acceptability to Administrative Agent and Buyers of any Purchased Asset or REO Property. The Seller Parties shall also pay, or reimburse Administrative Agent and Buyers if Administrative Agent or Buyers shall pay, any termination fee, which may be due any Servicer. The Seller Parties shall pay the reasonable and documented out-of-pocket fees and expenses of Administrative Agent’s and Buyers’ counsel in connection with the Program Agreements. Reasonable and documented legal fees for any subsequent amendments to this Agreement or related documents shall be borne by the Seller Parties. The Seller Parties shall pay ongoing custodial fees and expenses as set forth in the Custodial Agreement, and any other ongoing fees and expenses payable in accordance with any other Program Agreement. Without limiting the foregoing, the Seller Parties shall pay all fees as and when required under the Pricing Side Letter. b. If any Buyer determines that, due to the introduction of, any change in, or the compliance by such Buyer with (i) any eurocurrency reserve requirement or (ii) the interpretation of any law, regulation or any guideline or request from any central bank or other Governmental Authority (whether or not having the force of law), there shall be an increase in the cost to such Buyer in engaging in the present or any future Transactions, then, to the extent each Seller Party and Guarantor received notice of such amounts no later than thirty (30) days after the incurrence of such costs, then each Seller Party and Guarantor may, at its option and in its sole discretion, either (i) terminate this Agreement and repurchase the Purchased Assets and pay costs or (ii) promptly pay such Buyer the actual cost of additional amounts as specified by such Buyer to compensate such Buyer for such increased costs; provided, however, that any such determination by any Buyer must also be made in a manner substantially consistent with respect to similarly situated counterparties with substantially similar assets in similar facilities. c. With respect to any Transaction, Administrative Agent and Buyers may conclusively rely upon, and shall incur no liability to any Seller Party or Guarantor in acting upon, any request or other communication that Administrative Agent and Buyers reasonably believe to have been given or made by a person authorized to enter into a Transaction on each Seller Party’s behalf, whether or not such person is listed on the certificate delivered pursuant to Section 10.a(5) hereof. d. Notwithstanding the assignment of the Program Agreements with respect to each Purchased Asset to Administrative Agent for the benefit of Buyers, Seller Parties and Guarantor agrees and covenants with Administrative Agent and Buyers to reasonably enforce in a commercially reasonable manner Seller Parties’ and Guarantor’s rights and remedies with respect to parties other than Administrative Agent and Buyers set forth in the Program Agreements. (i) Any payments made by a Seller Party or Guarantor to Administrative Agent or a Buyer or a Buyer assignee or participant hereunder or any Program Agreement shall be made free and clear of and without deduction or withholding for any Taxes, except as required by applicable law. If a Seller Party or Guarantor shall be required by applicable law (as determined in the good faith discretion of the applicable withholding agent) to deduct or withhold any Tax from any sums payable to Administrative Agent or a Buyer or Buyer assignee or participant, then (1) a Seller Party or Guarantor shall make such deductions or withholdings and pay the full amount deducted to the relevant Governmental Authority in accordance with applicable law; (2) to the extent the withheld or deducted Tax is an Indemnified Tax, the sum payable shall be increased as necessary so that after making such deductions and withholdings (including such deductions and withholdings applicable to additional sums payable under this Section 11.e Administrative Agent or a Buyer receives an amount equal to the sum it would have received had no such deductions or withholdings been made; and

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference.

  • Performance Evaluations The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!