Constructability and Coordination Reviews Sample Clauses

Constructability and Coordination Reviews. On at least a monthly basis or such other intervals identified in the Contract Documents, Design-Builder shall meet with the County, its Separate Contractors, and consultants to coordinate the Construction Documents, including the design of building systems delegated to the Design-Builder, for the purpose of continuing construction feasibility, identifying conflicts, missing information or gaps in the planned scope of Work and to take appropriate action to ensure the full scope of intended Work is performed efficiently and economically.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Constructability and Coordination Reviews. Construction Manager shall review preliminary construction documents prepared by the A/E and prepare a written report on whether the design will: 5.4.7.1 Be biddable, constructable and provide a facility with the lowest reasonable construction costs, including the relative feasibility of construction methods, availability of materials and labor, time requirements for procurement, installation and construction, and factors related to construction cost, including, but not limited to, costs of alternative designs or materials, preliminary budgets and possible economies; and 5.4.7.2 Minimize the maintenance and operational costs on a Project and Plan-wide basis, including standardization and similarity in equipment and materials (such report based upon, in part, communications with A/E's on other Projects and representatives of the District maintenance department on proposed specifications). Construction Manager shall provide specific documentation, identify any specific design details that adversely affect constructability, cost or schedules, and provide recommendations to substantiate and help correct such findings. Construction Manager shall provide comments on sequencing of construction (phases), means and methods, duration of construction of various building methods, whether bidding and construction periods will conform to the District’s schedule periods, and whether the proposed construction contract time is adequate for a reasonable contractor to complete the contract. Also, when requested by District, the Construction Manager shall provide evaluations, advice and recommendations on construction materials and systems under consideration by the Project A/E or recommended by other sources. Construction Manager will follow up to verify that the design has thereafter addressed and responded to the Construction Manager’s comments re: constructability.
Sample 1
Constructability and Coordination Reviews. On at least a monthly basis or such other intervals identified in the Contract Documents, Design-Builder shall meet with the City, its Separate Contractors, and consultants to coordinate both the Design Development Documents and Construction Documents, including the design of building systems delegated to the Design-Builder, for the purpose of continuing construction feasibility, identifying conflicts, missing information or gaps in the planned scope of Work and to take appropriate action to ensure the full scope of intended Work is performed efficiently and economically.
Sample 1

Related to Constructability and Coordination Reviews

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that: 10.1.2.1.6.1 Ensures construction documents are well coordinated and reviewed for errors; 10.1.2.1.6.2 Identifies to the extent known, construction deficiencies and areas of concern; 10.1.2.1.6.3 Back-checks design drawings for inclusion of modifications; and 10.1.2.1.6.4 Provides the District with written confirmation that: 10.1.2.1.6.4.1 Requirements noted in the design documents prepared for the Project are consistent with and conform to the District's Project requirements and design standards. 10.1.2.1.6.4.2 Various components have been coordinated and are consistent with each other so as to minimize conflicts within or between components of the design documents.

  • Project Management and Coordination The Engineer shall coordinate all subconsultant activity to include quality of and consistency of work and administration of the invoices and monthly progress reports. The Engineer shall coordinate with necessary local entities.

  • Cooperation and Coordination The Parties acknowledge and agree that it is their mutual objective and intent to minimize, to the extent feasible and legal, taxes payable with respect to their collaborative efforts under this Agreement and that they shall use all commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate and coordinate with each other to achieve such objective.

  • Cooperation with Inspector General Grantee understands its duty, pursuant to Section 20.055(5), Fla. Stat., to cooperate with Florida Housing’s Inspector General in any investigation, audit, inspection, review, or hearing. Grantee will comply with this duty and ensure that any contracts issued under this Agreement impose this requirement, in writing, on its subcontractors.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Coordination The Parties shall confer regularly to coordinate the planning, scheduling and performance of preventive and corrective maintenance on the Large Generating Facility and the Interconnection Facilities.

  • Project Coordination The Engineer shall coordinate all subconsultant activity to include quality and consistency of deliverables and administration of the invoices and monthly progress reports. The Engineer shall coordinate with necessary local entities.

  • Reviews (a) During the term of this Agreement and for 7 years after the term of this Agreement, the HSP agrees that the Funder or its authorized representatives may conduct a Review of the HSP to confirm the HSP’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Agreement. For these purposes the Funder or its authorized representatives may, upon 24 hours’ Notice to the HSP and during normal business hours enter the HSP’s premises to: inspect and copy any financial records, invoices and other finance- related documents, other than personal health information as defined in the Enabling Legislation, in the possession or under the control of the HSP which relate to the Funding or otherwise to the Services; and inspect and copy non-financial records, other than personal health information as defined in the Enabling Legislation, in the possession or under the control of the HSP which relate to the Funding, the Services or otherwise to the performance of the HSP under this Agreement. (b) The cost of any Review will be borne by the HSP if the Review: (1) was made necessary because the HSP did not comply with a requirement under the Enabling Legislation or this Agreement; or (2) indicates that the HSP has not fulfilled its obligations under this Agreement, including its obligations under Applicable Law and Applicable Policy. (c) To assist in respect of the rights set out in (a) above, the HSP shall disclose any information requested by the Funder or its authorized representatives and shall do so in a form requested by the Funder or its authorized representatives. (d) The HSP may not commence a proceeding for damages or otherwise against any person with respect to any act done or omitted to be done, any conclusion reached or report submitted that is done in good faith in respect of a Review.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!