Consultant Evaluations Sample Clauses

Consultant Evaluations. Consultant Evaluations are performed at the Part or Work Order level for the prime and every subconsultant for that Part or Work Order. These evaluations are a valuable management tool for the evaluation of the current consultant work and services, as well as selection for future work and services. The consultant(s) available for evaluation for a particular Part or Work Order are dependent on the respective Consultant Hierarchy in the Technical Proposal. An Interim Consultant Evaluation can be processed at anytime during the life of the Part or Work Order. However, an Interim Consultant Evaluation must be completed if, at any time, a consultant’s performance fails to meet expectations for the part or work order. A Final Consultant Evaluation must be processed for each prime consultant at the completion of any Part or Work Order. The “Final” or “Interim” radio buttons indicate the type of evaluation being performed. Upon creation of the evaluation by the IO Project Manager, weights must be assigned for each evaluation criteria. Weights are established on a one to ten basis based on importance for this project, with ten being the most important. If criteria does not apply for the project, use the ECMS defaulted “N/A” weight. After the weights are established, the consultant project manager must acknowledge the evaluation weights prior to the NTP of parts or the creation of a legal work order. Insert the corresponding scores upon receipt of a final invoice. Descriptions regarding appropriate values for the scores are shown on the rating description sections of the evaluation form. When completing the Consultant Evaluation the conduct of the consultant team in regards to meeting schedules, completing work on time, and new ideas brought to the project should be considered. A general evaluation for each subconsultant must be completed on the prime consultant’s final evaluation. The IO Project Manager completes the evaluation form and submits it to the Portfolio Manager or the ADE for Department Review. If the evaluation is considered acceptable, it is then submitted to the consultant for their review and comments. For “Professional Fees”, only designate the range that includes the final invoiced amount for the consultant being evaluated for the Part being evaluated. The completed evaluation must be submitted to each consultant within thirty days of the receipt of an acceptable final invoice. Notification of the completed evaluation will appear in the consultant’...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Consultant Evaluations

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATIONS 3. Any matter for which there is recourse under State or Federal statutes.

  • TEACHER EVALUATIONS A. Each teacher shall have the right, upon request, to review the contents of his/her personal file folder.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Employee Performance Evaluations Any employee performance evaluation shall be prepared by the employee's supervisor who has the responsibility and authority to prepare such reports. Employee performance evaluation reports shall be discussed with the employee prior to finalization of each category of the report. An employee will receive an appointment with his/her department's reviewing officer to discuss the evaluation by signing the evaluation form in the space provided. Each department shall make a reasonable effort to ensure that the reviewing officer for this purpose has not been a party to the preparation of the evaluation. In no case shall the reviewing officer sign the evaluation form until a review has occurred. Any regular or special evaluation with a rating of "unsatisfactory" shall include plans for employee development. Except in cases of termination, release from probation, or leave of absence, employees who receive an unsatisfactory performance evaluation must receive a follow-up evaluation. The follow-up evaluation shall cover a period of time no greater than ninety (90) calendar days from the date of the final review of the initial unsatisfactory evaluation. An employee shall have the right to submit written comments regarding any evaluation and to have such comments included in his/her personnel file along with the evaluation.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the fall semester.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATION 14.1 The purpose of employee evaluation is to support decisions concerning employee discipline, promotion and improvement. Evaluation shall be the responsibility of the immediate supervisor who shall not be a member of the bargaining unit.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.